Encapsulation of buffalo bull semen
An average volume of 3.03 ml of semen was collected from the buffalo bulls by the artificial vagina method, having an average concentration of 1222.34 × 10
6 ml in the present study.
Encapsulation procedure resulted in a polymerization of alginate with calcium, resulting in the formation of calcium alginate, which is presented in the form of capsules, each containing 4.55 µl neat semen in its core, having an average semen concentration of 3.34 × 10
6 capsule. Alginate-based biomaterials have been shown to possess favourable biocompatibility and structural stability in animal tissue systems, supporting their suitability for controlled biological applications (
Qin and Guan, 2017).
After equilibrating the encapsules in Tris - Egg Yolk - Citrate dilutor for 5, 30 and 60 minutes duration and subsequent conventional vapour freezing of semen capsules in 0.50 ml French Medium Straws, thawing at 37
oC for 60 seconds and dissolving the capsules in normal saline solution instead of sodium citrate solution for 2 minutes, the post freeze semen sample showed arrested motility for first 10 - 15 minutes followed by resumption of progressive motility in the semen sample.
Alginate concentration above 1.0 per cent is required to maintain the spherical shape of the semen capsule, as stated by
Shah et al. (2010) and is in agreement with the findings of the present study. In the present experiment, the spermatozoa encapsulated with physiological seminal plasma were suspended rather than diluted in the semen dilutor, thus ensuring molecular nutrient and metabolite exchanges but providing pH buffering to avoid ‘‘dilution shock’’ facilitating a virtual dilution after microencapsulation, which is in complete agreement with the earlier findings of
Torre et al. (2000) and
Johnson et al. (2000).
Pre- and post-freeze characteristics of buffalo bull semen
Semen motility
Average semen motility (+SE) in Group I (Conventional) and Group II (Encapsulated) cryopreserved buffalo bull semen is shown in Table 1.
After dilution in tris-egg yolk-citrate dilutor, the mean post-dilution motility of buffalo bull semen in Group II (Encapsulation) (49.44±2.12%) was numerically lower than that observed in Group I (Conventional) (53.29±2.51%), however, no significant difference was seen between the groups statistically (p>0.05). Earlier findings of
Nebel et al. (1985), who observed 46.7 and 48.3 percent motility for encapsulated swine semen against the 51.7 per cent motility for the control group, are in accordance with the present findings.
Torre et al., (2000) also found that the motility of encapsulated spermatozoa was lower than that of the free sperm, which is in agreement with the present findings. This may be because alginate matrix residues could interfere with sperm kinetic activity, thereby reducing sperm motility.
After dilution and equilibration for 5, 30 and 60 minutes, no significant difference in motility was observed in Group I (Conventional) and Group II (Encapsulation) at any equilibration intervals (P>0.05). Our findings are consistent with those of
Olar et al., (1989), who suggested that the maintenance of motility and viability in encapsulated sperm at different concentrations may be due to the porosity of the capsule membrane being adequate to facilitate the exchange of nutrients and waste products at the surface-to-volume ratio presented by capsule sizes.
However, significantly higher post-thaw motility was observed in Group I (Conventional) (38.75±2.75 per cent) than in Group II (Encapsulated) (19.46±1.35 per cent) (P<0.01), suggesting that encapsulation may not provide sufficient protection against cryoinjury during freezing and thawing. These findings are similar to those of
Vishwanath et al., (1997), who observed a comparatively lower motility (11.7±6.2%) in bovine encapsulated semen than in control semen samples (36.7±7.5%) after both were incubated at 37
oC for 96 hours.
Following the conventional method of cryopreservation,
El-Sheshtawy et al. (2008) and
Gupta and Saxena (2000) showed similar (32.50±1.53 and 39.58±8.06 per cent) post-thaw motility in cryopreserved buffalo bull semen when compared with the control semen samples of the present study. A similar decline in post-thaw motility has been reported in crossbred bull semen using computer-assisted sperm analysis, emphasising the detrimental impact of cryopreservation on the fertilizing capacity of the sperm (
Patel and Dhami, 2013)
In the present study, after an equilibration period of 5, 30 and 60 minutes, the post-thaw motility of Group I (Conventional) is significantly higher (P<0.01) than that of Group II (Encapsulation), with significantly higher (P<0.01) post-thaw motility observed after an equilibration period of 30 and 60 minutes compared to 5 minutes.
These observations are in agreement with the findings of
Shah et al., (2011), who studied canine semen encapsulation and reported that a decrease in sperm characteristics was observed in frozen-thawed semen due to cryopreservation, indicating that sufficient equilibration may mitigate, but not completely prevent, changes caused by cryodamage.
Viability of semen
Average sperm viability (+SE) as observed in Group I (Conventional) and Group II (Encapsulation) cryopreserved buffalo bull semen is shown in Table 2.
It was observed that in Group I (Conventional) and Group II (Encapsulation) cryopreserved buffalo bull semen, had significantly (P<0.01) higher (34.10±1.46 and 57.57± 2.00 per cent) viable spermatozoa after dilution than after post-thaw (24.28±1.14 and 32.10± 1.61 per cent), respectively (Table 2).
Comparatively, higher initial viability of spermatozoa was recorded by
Shah et al., (2011) for canine sperm (89.4±3.6 and 88.8±3.0 per cent) in unencapsulated and microencapsulated sperm. The difference was attributed to variation in species.
Average viability percentage as recorded in the present study is in accordance with the earlier findings of
Torre et al., (1998), who noted 60 per cent of viability for a swine semen sample encapsulated in hydroxyl propylmethyl cellulose and calcium chloride and of
Herrler et al., (2006) for human spermatozoa encapsulated in alginic acid - calcium chloride.
Shah et al., (2010) reported comparatively higher viability in polycation microencapsulated sperm (85.0±3.4% and 86.9±1.0%) and in unencapsulated (conventional) sperm (89.0±1.8%) from beagle dogs (
Canis familiaris), which differs from the present observations. The variation may be attributed to inter-species differences and the use of alternative encapsulating polymers compared to the alginate-based system employed in the present study.
Viability of microencapsulated sperm with glycerol exposure for 5, 30 and 60 min as recorded by
Shah et al., (2011) is comparatively higher (86.1±1.7, 85.6±3.7 and 86.5±3.2 per cent) and hence not in agreement with the findings of the present study.
After cryopreservation and thawing of bull semen, significantly (P<0.01) higher (32.10± 1.61 per cent) viable spermatozoa are observed in Group II (Encapsulation) than in Group I (Conventional) (24.28±1.14 per cent).
Using conventional cryopreservation methods in buffalo bull semen,
Ansari et al., (2010) reported comparatively higher sperm viability.
Following equilibration periods of 5, 30 and 60 minutes, the post-thaw viability observed in both Group I (Conventional) and Group II (Encapsulation) was consistent with the findings of
Shah et al., (2011). They reported that microencapsulated sperm exposed to glycerol for 30 and 60 minutes exhibited higher post-thaw viability as compared to unencapsulated sperm, however, a 5-minute glycerol exposure resulted in comparatively lower viability in both encapsulated and unencapsulated samples.
Plasma membrane integrity of buffalo bull semen by HOST
Average plasma membrane intact spermatozoa (+SE) in Group I (Conventional) and Group II (Encapsulation) cryopreserved buffalo bull semen are shown in Table 3.
Immediately after semen collection, the mean plasma membrane integrity observed in the present study (69.74±2.15%) was comparable to the values reported by
Khan and Ijaz (2007), who recorded 58.8±7.36% intact spermatozoa in undiluted buffalo semen and by
El-Sheshtawy et al. (2008), who reported 71.10±1.57% plasma membrane integrity in buffalo bull spermatozoa.
After dilution of the buffalo bull semen, the plasma membrane intact spermatozoa observed in Group I (Conventional) were 28.07±1.12 and in Group II (Encapsulation) were 56.18±1.62 per cent. The values observed in the encapsulated group were comparable to those reported by
El-Sheshtawy et al. (2008), who recorded 57.60±1.69% plasma membrane integrity in conventionally diluted buffalo bull semen.
An average of 21.28±1.08 and 30.58±1.60 per cent plasma membrane intact spermatozoa, respectively, were observed in the present study in post-thaw buffalo bull semen samples from Group I (Conventional) and Group II (Encapsulation).
The findings of this study are lower than those reported by
Wankhade (2008), who observed 58.75±1.07 per cent plasma membrane intact spermatozoa in the post-thawed semen sample of an encapsulated electro ejaculated black buck (
Antelope cervicapra) semen, whereas it was 64.38±1.11 per cent in the conventional sample. The differences recorded may be because of variation in species.
Comparatively higher percentage of plasma membrane intact spermatozoa were reported by
Khan and Ijaz (2007),
El-Sheshtawy et al. (2008),
Ansari et al., (2010) and
Akhter et al. (2010) for buffalo bull semen cryopreserved by the conventional method.