Dolnet design variability across Maharashtra
To examine gear specific adaptations in dolnet operations, detailed documentation was undertaken for the Karanja dolnet design in Raigad district. This design is characterized by region specific modifications in net length, mesh gradation, codend structure and anchoring system, reflecting adaptations to the local hydrodynamic environment, fishing depth and dominant target species.
The Karanja dolnet (Fig 2) deployed in semi enclosed estuarine conditions, represents a compact five section design with mesh sizes tapering from 120 mm to 12 mm at the codend. Karanja dolnet construction prioritizes retention of small pelagic species such as
Harpadon nehereus and
Acetes indicus. However, this fine codend mesh poses a high risk of juvenile retention, echoing previous findings in estuarine creek fisheries where similar gear structures were associated with substantial bycatch of immature individuals
(Pradhan et al., 2019). The risk is further compounded by the stationary nature of pole anchoring, which limits gear mobility and escapement opportunities during tidal shifts.
Catch composition of dominant fish species
The study documented 91 species from 44 families and 19 orders in dolnet fisheries at Karanja, Raigad, Maharashtra (Fig 3).
Harpadon nehereus (64%) dominated catches, followed by
Coilia dussumieri (13%) and
Trichiurus lepturus (2%), indicating strong selectivity toward small pelagics. Similar dominance of
H. nehereus and
C. dussumieri was reported from Bhayander estuary in Thane district by
(Pradhan et al., 2019) though their catches included more estuarine species like
Mystus gulio,
Acetes indicus and
Charybdis callianassa.
Seasonally, post-monsoon showed highest diversity (41 species), while monsoon (34 species) featured demersals like
Saurida tumbil and crustaceans such as
Acetes indicus. Pre-monsoon catches (38 species) notably included
H. nehereus,
Thryssa mystax and
Pampus argenteus. Cephalopods (
Uroteuthis duvaucelii,
Octopus vulgaris) primarily occurred during pre and post-monsoon.
H. nehereus contributed approximately 580 kg/boat annually, adapting well to local estuarine conditions with seasonal surges (
CMFRI, 2020).
C. dussumieri ranked second in biomass while
Acetes indicus showed consistent catches 90-100 kg/boat annually
(Larsen et al., 2018; Pradhan et al., 2019). Other species like
T. lepturus,
Pseudosciaena diacanthus,
Arius maculatus,
Mystus gulio,
Solenocera crassicornis,
Decapterus russelli individually yielded less than 20 kg/boat.
Ilisha filigera was negligible indicating possible rarity or fishing avoidance.
At Navabunder in Gujarat, Bombay duck dominated catches (69 to 77%) in 1986 followed by
Coilia dussumieri, ribbonfish and non-penaeid prawns (
Khan, 1986), whereas by 2018 non-penaeid shrimps led (40.22%) with Bombay duck and ribbonfish each at 15%
(Sikotaria et al., 2018). At Navedar in Navgaon, Raigad district were ribbonfish (31%), Bombay duck (25%) and Indian cod (25%) were major species (
Sehara and Kharbari, 1987). Madh Island catches were dominated by prawns (53%), while Navabunder showed seasonal dominance shifts, with Bombay duck in post monsoon and ribbonfish in pre monsoon. Sassoon Dock catches primarily included
Harpadon nehereus (34.67%),
Acetes indicus (32.09%) and
Palaemon tenuipes (8.78%) (
Pillai, 1983). These variations highlight adaptability and seasonal targeting influenced by regional ecology and fishing practices.
Seasonal catch comparison of major species
Harpadon nehereus dominated all seasons, peaking post monsoon, indicating significant recruitment or migration similar to findings by (
Sreekrishna and Shenoy, 2001). Conversely,
(Pradhan et al., 2019) noted seasonal absence in Bhayander estuary, suggesting local variability.
Coilia dussumieri showed highest catches pre monsoon, likely related to breeding or estuarine salinity shifts, declining thereafter.
Acetes indicus exhibited stable catches year-round, reflecting environmental resilience. Other species (
Trichiurus lepturus,
Pseudosciaena diacanthus,
Arius maculatus,
Mystus gulio,
Solenocera crassicornis,
Decapterus russelli) had minimal contributions, primarily post monsoon, possibly due to spawning or improved gear performance.
Ilisha filigera remained rare, suggesting limited abundance or gear avoidance. These patterns underline the need for season specific fishery management (Fig 4).
Order wise catch composition
Average monthly catch composition (Fig 5) revealed distinct patterns linked to species behaviour, habitat preference and gear selectivity. Aulopiformes dominated the catch, with the highest average contribution of approximately 2.7 kg boat
-1 day
-1, indicating its major role in the overall dolnet landings. This was followed by Acanthuriformes, which contributed about 2.0 kg boat
-1 day
-1. Moderate catches ranging from 1.5 to 1.8 kg boat
-1 day
-1 were recorded for Decapoda, Clupeiformes, Stomatopoda, Anguilliformes, Scombriformes, Perciformes, Crabs and Orectolobiformes, suggesting their regular availability in the fishing grounds. Intermediate catch contributions of 1.2 to 1.4 kg boat
-1 day
-1 from Carcharhiniformes, Cypriniformes, Myopsida, Gobiiformes, Siluriformes, Tetraodontiformes and Scorpaeniformes reflected occasional but consistent representation in the catch. Lower catches of about 1.0 kg boat
-1 day
-1 were observed for Beloniformes, Gadiformes and Pleuronectiformes, indicating relatively limited contribution compared with the dominant groups. The least abundant orders were Octopoda and Squamata, with average catches of approximately 0.5 and 0.2 kg boat
-1 day
-1, respectively, suggesting rare or seasonal occurrence
(Pradhan et al., 2019). These variations highlight the influence of ecological availability and dolnet selectivity on catch composition, emphasizing the importance of order-level monitoring for assessing fisheries sustainability.
Species wise CPUE from dolnet trials at Karanja
Harpadon nehereus dominated catches (~565 kg/boat), followed by
Coilia dussumieri (120 kg) and
Acetes indicus (90 kg). Remaining species each contributed <10 kg, highlighting strong gear selectivity and fishery dependence on
H. nehereus, emphasizing the need for targeted management (Fig 6).
Monthly catch and CPUE trends
Highest catches occurred in October (531,300 kg), aligning with post-monsoon peak fishing activity (
Deshmukh, 2013). CPUE was highest in September (88.4 kg) and October (92.4 kg), while lowest in February (14.8 kg) and March (19.4 kg), consistent with (
Khan, 1987) from Gujarat, albeit with higher CPUE values there due to fishing grounds and fleet size variations (Fig 7 and 8). Fig 9 provides additional comparative insights into temporal CPUE variations along Maharashtra coast, highlighting similarities in seasonal patterns with other regions.
Tidal amplitude influence
Catch rates correlated strongly (r=0.84) with tidal amplitude, peaking in September (~87 kg/boat, tidal amplitude ~5.0 m) and lowest in March (~36 kg/boat, tidal amplitude ~2.5-2.6 m). Enhanced catches during higher tidal amplitudes likely result from increased fish aggregation and improved gear performance (
Soliman and Yamaoka, 2010) (Fig 10 and 11).
Juvenile percentage composition
Juvenile bycatch peaked in September (21.3%) and August (20.4%), corresponding to recruitment phases for
H. nehereus and
C. dussumieri. High juvenile catch highlights urgent need for gear selectivity improvements. Square mesh codends (≥40 mm) could significantly reduce juvenile bycatch, aligning with sustainable fishing practices (
Robertson and Stewart, 1988). The adoption of a 40 mm mesh size in dolnet fisheries targeting Bombay duck is supported by both biological and modelling evidence. The species has a minimum legal size (MLS) of 180 mm and a length at first maturity (Lm) of about 207-244 mm, so gear should achieve an L50 at or above these thresholds. Covered codend selectivity models allow testing of mesh sizes and results from earlier studies show that 30-40 mm codends improve mean size at capture compared with finer meshes. A 40 mm square mesh is the smallest size likely to reduce juvenile catch by 20-30% while keeping legal catch losses within 10%, thus aligning with MLS regulations and moving retention closer to Lm. Supporting tools such as bioeconomic yield-per-recruit analysis, morphometric escape tests and field trials further strengthen this recommendation.
Limitations
Dolnet operations are highly sensitive to environmental variability such as tidal currents, wind, depth and turbidity and even minor fluctuations can alter net geometry and escapement, complicating the assessment of gear effects. Although hauls were conducted across seasons, the spatial and temporal coverage may not fully represent all dolnet sites along Maharashtra’s 877.97 km coastline, as site-specific ecology and fisher practices influence catches. Juvenile classification relied on minimum legal size (MLS) or length at first maturity (Lm), but limited species-specific MLS data and uneven sample sizes, particularly for rarer species, introduce uncertainty. Complete gear standardization was not possible due to variations in dimensions, mesh size and anchoring methods among operators, with vessel and crew differences further adding variability. Finally, statistical analyses assume consistent data quality, yet outliers from weather, mechanical issues, or unusual species aggregations may affect outcomes and observed correlations (
e.g., tidal amplitude and catch rates) cannot be interpreted as causation.
Implications
The study highlights the need for stricter enforcement of minimum legal size (MLS) regulations, particularly for Bombay duck (
Harpadon nehereus) and supports incorporating gear modifications such as square mesh and double codends to curb recruitment overfishing. Improved selectivity can sustain fish stocks and ensure stable livelihoods for coastal communities by reducing juvenile mortality and preserving future yields. Documented gear variations provide a foundation for designing eco-friendly, standardized dolnets that balance efficiency with bycatch reduction, while the reduction of juvenile bycatch also aids biodiversity conservation and strengthens ecosystem based fisheries management in line with SDG 14-Life Below Water.