Indian Journal Of Animal Research

COMPARATIVE RESPONSE OF VITAMIN-MINERAL VS HERBAL THERAPY IN ALLEVIATING POST-PARTUM TRUE ANESTRUM IN DAIRY COWS

Article Id: ARCC1608 | Page : 222-223
Citation :- COMPARATIVE RESPONSE OF VITAMIN-MINERAL VS HERBAL THERAPY IN ALLEVIATING POST-PARTUM TRUE ANESTRUM IN DAIRY COWS.Indian Journal Of Animal Research.2009.(43):222-223
Jakir Hussain, A. S. Bhat, M. Shaheen1 and R. Islam2
Address : Cattle Research Station, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (K), Manasbal, Safapora, 193504 (J. & K.) India.

Abstract

Twenty four post-partum true anestrous cows were divided randomly into three equal groups
viz. T1, T2 and C consisting 8 crossbred Jersey cows in each group. The cows in T1 group were
treated with Agrimin powder (Glaxo) @ 30 gram orally daily for 21 days and vitamin-A injection
(Glaxo) 4 ml i/m on alternate day for 3 days. The cows in T2 group were given Prajana HS capsule
(Indian Herbs) @ 3 capsules orally for two consecutive days and repeated the same dose on 11th
and 12th day after first treatment. The cows in C group were kept as control and no treatment was
given to them. Induction of estrus was 87.5%, 75.0% and 37.5% in T1, T2 and C groups respectively.The occurrence of estrus in T1 group differed significantly (p0.05) from C group. Conceptionrate was 71.4%, 50.0% and 33.3% in T1, T2 and C groups respectively. There was no significant difference of conception rates amog the different groups.

Keywords

Anestrous Jesrey Crossbred Herbal Mineral mix Vitamin.

References

  1. Bhattacharya, H. K. et al. (2001). Indian Vet. J. 78 (12): 1160-1161.
  2. Hussain, J. et al. (2006). Indian J. Field. Vet. 2 (1): 36-37
  3. Madhavan, E. and Iyer, CPN. (1993). Indian J. Anim. Reprod. 14 (2): 125.
  4. Singh, I.D. et al. (1984). Indian J. Anim. Reprod. 4 (2): 18 – 21.
  5. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1968). Statistical Methods, 6th Edn., Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi.
  6. Wani N.A. et al. (1999). SKUAST. J. Res. 1: 95-98.
  7. Wheeler, G.E. (1993). Indian J. Indg. Med. 10 (1): 61 – 62

Global Footprints