Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.20

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 49 issue 4 (august 2015) : 327-332

Note on the enzyme activities, productivity and quality parameters of chickpea cultivars under influence of diverse synthetic plant growth promoters

Mohammad Bagher Hassanpouraghdam1, El-Sayed Mohamed Sayed Mohamed El- Amery2, Mohammad Mazid
1Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh-202 002, India.
Cite article:- Hassanpouraghdam1 Bagher Mohammad, Amery2 El- Mohamed Sayed Mohamed El-Sayed, Mazid Mohammad (2023). Note on the enzyme activities, productivity and quality parameters of chickpea cultivars under influence of diverse synthetic plant growth promoters. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 49(4): 327-332. doi: 10.5958/0976-058X.2015.00059.1.
The experiment was planned to determine the most effective leaf-applied plant growth regulators (PGRs) for the optimum performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars and to select the most promising cultivar. The PGRs viz., indole-3-acetic acid, gibberellic acid, kinetin, salicylic acid and triacontanol and the cultivars, DCP 92-3, GNG-469, KWR-108 and local (H1). Biochemical characteristics like carbonic anhydrase activity (CA), nitrate reductase (NR) activity, yield parameters viz., number of pods per plant, seed number per pod, 100-seed weight, seed yield per plant, and quality attributes i.e., seed protein content were affected by all foliar PGRs but most promising with GA. On one hand, among the cultivars, DCP 92-3 gave the maximum seed yield which was 60% higher over local. Similarly, on other hand, among the PGRs, GA produces the 175% higher seed yield than water-sprayed control (Fw). The interaction treatment was found non-significant for most of the parameter mentioned above.
  1. Akter, A.; Ali, E.; Islam, M.M.Z.; Karim, R and Razzaque, A.H.M. (2007). Effect of GA3 on growth and yield of mustard. Int. J. Sustain. Crop Prod., 2(2): 16-20.
  2. Alam, M.M.; Naeem, M.; Idrees, M.; Khan, M.M.A. and Moinuddin. (2012). Augmentation of photosynthesis, crop productivity, enzyme activities and alkaloids production in sadabahar (Catharanthus roseus L.) through application of diverse plant growth regulators. J. Crop Sci. Biotech., 15: 117-129.
  3. Buchanan, B.B.; Gruissen, W. and Jones, R.L. (2000). Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. American Society of Plant physiologists, Rockville, Maryland.
  4. Chaurasia, S. and Chaurasia, A.K. (2008). Effect of fertility levels and growth regulators on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Crop Res., 36: 71-75.
  5. Dwivedi, R.S. and Randhawa, N.S. (1974). Evaluation of rapid test for the hidden hunger of zinc in plants. Plant Soil. 40: 445-451.
  6. Estruch, J.J.; Pereto, J.G.; Vercher, Y. and Beltran, J.P. (1989). Sucrose loading in isolated veins of Pisum sativum: Regulation by abscisic acid, gibberellic acid and cell turgor. Plant Physiol., 91: 259-265.
  7. El-Tayeb, M.A. (2005). Response of barley grains to the interactive effect of salinity and salicylic acid. Plant Growth Regul. 45: 215-224.
  8. FAO (2012). Medium term prospects for agricultural commodities: Projections to the year 2000. FAO Economic and Social Development Paper No. 120. Rome.
  9. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Ed. J. Wiley and Sons, New York.
  10. Hassanpouraghdam, M.B.; Hajisamadi, A. B. and Khalighi, A. (2011). Gibberellic acid foliar application influences growth, volatile oil and some physiological characteristics of lavender (Lavandula officinalis Chaix). Romanian Biotechnol. Letters., 16: 6322-6327.
  11. Jaworski, E.G. (1971). Nitrate reductase assay in intact plant tissues. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 43: 1274-1279.
  12. Khafagy, M.A. (1995). Effects of growth substances, biological boron and their combination on soybean plants under nitrogen levels. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ. 20: 4641–4658.
  13. Khan, M.N. (2008).Response of Linum usitatissimum L. to the Application of GA3, N, P, Ca and Mg. Ph.D. Thesis, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
  14. Khan, N.A.; Ansari, H.R. and Samiullah. (1998). Effect of gibberellic acid spray during ontogeny of mustard on growth, nutrient uptake and yield characteristics. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 181: 61-63.
  15. Kharche, P.V.; Kubde, K.J. and Solunke, P.S. (2006). Effect of phosphorus, sulphur and PSB on quality components and nutrient uptake in chickpea. Ann. Plant Physiol., 20: 78-81.
  16. Lowry, O.H.; Rosebrough, N.J.; Farr, A.L. and Randall, R. J. (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem., 193: 265-275.
  17. Mansur, C.P.; Palled, Y.B.; Halikatti, S.I.; Salimath, P.M. and Chetti, M.B. (2009). Effect of plant densities and phosphorus levels on seed yield and protein content of Kabuli chickpea genotypes. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 22: 267-270.
  18. Mobin, M. (1999). Morphophysiology and Productivity of mustard in Relation to Gibberellic Acid and Sulphur Application. Ph.D. Thesis, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
  19. Mazid,M.,Ali,B.,Hayat,S. andAhmad,A.(2010).The effect of 4-chloro-3-indoleacetic acid on some growth parameters in mung bean under cadmium stress.Turk. J. Biol., 34: 9-13.
  20. Mazid, M. (2014). Seed priming application of gibberellic acid on growth, biochemical, yield and protein status of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. cv. DCP 92-3). International Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology., 5(1): 17-22.
  21. Mazid, M. Mohammad, F. (2012). Environmental constraints responsible for reduction in productivity of chickpea: Revisit an old problem. Int. J. Envt. Eng. Manage. 3(5): 32-35.
  22. Rupela, O. (1987). Nodulation and nitrogen fixation in chickpea. In: The Chickpea. M. Saxena and K.B. Singh (eds.). CAB International, Wallingford, UK,pp. 191-206.
  23. Shah, S.H. and Samiullah. (2007). Response of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) to applied nitrogen with or without gibberellic acid spray. World J. Agric. Sci. 3: 153-158.
  24. Taiz, L. and Zeiger. E. (2010). Plant Physiology. 5th Ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA, USA.
  25. Tripathi, D.K.; Lallu, Bhushan, C. and Baghel, R.S. (2007). Effect of some growth regulators on flower drop and yield of chickpea. J. Food Leg., 20: 117-118.
  26. Tiwari, D.K.; Pandey, P.; Giri, S.P. and Dwivedi, J.L. (2011). Effect of GA3 and other plant growth regulators on hybrid rice seed production. Asian J. Plant Sci., 10: 133-139.
  27. Yadav, R.M. and Bharud, R.W. (2006). Response of Kabuli chickpea to the foliar application of growth substances. Mysore J. Agri. Sci., 40: 134-137.

Editorial Board

View all (0)