Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi
Print ISSN 0367-8245
Online ISSN 0976-058X
NAAS Rating 5.60
SJR 0.293

Frequency :

Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 35 issue 4 (december 2001) : 259 - 262

TISSUE CULTURE STUDIES IN INDIAN MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA L. CZERN & COSS)

Shiv Ratan*, B.R. Ranwah, R.P. Singh

Affiliations

¹Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur-313001, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Ratan* Shiv, Ranwah B.R., Singh R.P. (2024). TISSUE CULTURE STUDIES IN INDIAN MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA L. CZERN & COSS). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 35(4): 259 - 262. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Different concentrations of hormones and their combinations were applied to most commonly used explantsviz; hypocotyl and cotyledon cultured on MS medium. Swelling and callus formation was more frequent in cotyledon explant. The frequency and amount of callus was higher in treatment IAA (0.2 mg −1) +KIN (2.0 mg −1). This treatment was applied to different genotypes of B. Juncea. There was significant difference for days to callus induction, fresh and dry weight of callus. The earliest callus induction was observed in geotype T 59 i.e. 7819g and 0.654g respectively, at 45 th DAI. All the genotypes regenerated shoots. In sub-culturing, genotypic difference were also significant for fresh and dry weights of callus. But trend of callus growth was different. Both fresh and dry weight of callus was observed maximum in genotype RH 781 Le. 5.498g and 0.564g, respectively. Shoot regeneration was not observed in any genotype in sub-culturing though all chemical and physical conditions were same.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Cai, D.T. et al. (1987). Oil Crops China, 4: 12-21.
George, L. and Rao, 0.5. (1983). PI. Sci. Lett. 30: 327-330.
Goyal, R.K. et al. (l990). IndIan J. Expt. Bioi. 28: 1034-2039.
Handro, W. (1981). PP. 156. In : .Plant Tissue Culture: Methods and Applications in Agriculture (Thorpe T.A. Ed.). Academic Press, London.
262 INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
Jain, R.K. etal. (1989). Euphytica, 40:75-81.
Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962). Physiol. P/. 15: 473-497,
Ono, Y eta/. (1994). Pant Cell Reports, 14: 13-17.
Punia, M.S. et al. (1993), Ann. BioI. 9: 230-234.
Song, YH. et al. (1987), Acta Genetics Sinica, 14: 243-248
Yadav, R.c. eta/. (1991). Ann. BioI. (Ludhiana), 7: 119-124

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

TISSUE CULTURE STUDIES IN INDIAN MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA L. CZERN & COSS)

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board