Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 35 issue 4 (december 2001) : 247 - 250

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENRICHED PHOSPHOCOMPOST AND CHEMICAL FERTILIZER ON CROP YIELDS AND SOIL BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY IN AN ALLUVIAL SOIL

M.C. Manna; J.N. Hajra'", A.B. Singh
1Indian Institute of Soil Science, Nabibagh, Berasia Road, Bhopal - 462 038, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Hajra'" J.N. Manna; M.C., Singh A.B. (2024). COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENRICHED PHOSPHOCOMPOST AND CHEMICAL FERTILIZER ON CROP YIELDS AND SOIL BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY IN AN ALLUVIAL SOIL. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 35(4): 247 - 250. doi: .
An experiment was conducted to prepare nutritionally enriched phosphocompost and to evaluate its effect on crop yields and soil microbial activity in an alluvial soil. It was ascertained that the cowdung slurry enriched phosphocompost was more successful in acceleration the decomposition process as compared to multiple microbial inoculants along with rockphosphate for compost, in turn, caused lowering the C: N ratio 12.2: 1. Water soluble P and citrate soluble P increased significantly (p = < 0.5) by the application of rockphosphate at the rate of 1.25% P 2O 5 and further, increased by 2.5% P 2O 5. Application of enriched compost at the rate of 10/t ha significantly increased the grain yield of rice and black gram. The activity of soil microbial biomass carbon was 1.7 fold higher under cowdung enriched phosphocompost compared to inorganic fertilizer application in alluvial soil.
    1. Bharadwaj, KKR. and Gaur. A e. (l 'J85).Recycling of organic wastes. ICAR, New Delhi.pp.104.
    2. Hajra, J.N. etc. (1992) indian JAgric.Sci. 62:540-544.
    3. Hajra,J.N. etc. (1994). Trap Agric. (Trinidad) 71: 147-149.
    4. Jackson, M.L. (1967). Soil Chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi.
    5. Jenkinson, O.s. and Ladd, J.N. (1981). Microbial biomass iJ 1 soil: mea.'iurement and turnover,. Marcel Dekker, NewYork, p 5.
    6. Jenkinson, O.S. and Powlson OS (1976). Soil BioI. Hlochem. 8 209-21.3
    7. Manna. M.e. and Ganguly, T.K. (1998). AgJic. Rev. 19: 86-104.
    8. Manna, M.e. and Hajra, IN. (1996). J indian Soc. Soil Sci. 44: 526-527.
    9. Manna, M.C and Ganguly, T.K. (1997). JSoil Bioi. Ecoi. 17: 88-94.
    10. Wagooner, P.E. (1974). The biochemistry and methodology of composting Connecticut AgriLExptLStn. Bull 754, p 9

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)