Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 35 issue 2 (june 2001) : 1118 -120

EFFECT OF CERTAIN GROWTH REGULATORS ON GROWTH, , YIELD AND QUAUlY OF RICE (ORYZA SATIVA L.)

A.K. Pandey, R.S. Tripathi, R.S. Yadav
1Department of Crop Physiology, C.S. Azad University of Agriculture andTechnology, Kanpur - 208 002, Inclia
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Pandey A.K., Tripathi R.S., Yadav R.S. (2024). EFFECT OF CERTAIN GROWTH REGULATORS ON GROWTH, , YIELD AND QUAUlY OF RICE (ORYZA SATIVA L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 35(2): 1118 -120. doi: .
Effect of five growth regulators each in two concentrations viz. IAA @ 25 and 50ppm, CCC @ 2000 and 4000ppm, Miraculan @ 5 and 10ppm, Cytokinin @, 5 and 10ppm and Alar @ 2000 and 3000ppm with one unsprayed control on growth, yield and quality of rice variety Sarju-52 under field conditions, was studied. Plant height was significantly reduced by higher concentrations of both CCC and Alar. Higher dose of IAA @50ppm significantly increased plant height and produced highest grain yield of 5533 kg/ha, as against 4720 kg/ha in the control. The increase in gram yield were contributed largely by increased chlorpophyll content, panicles per plant, grains per panicle, grain weight per plant, 1000 grain weight and high harvest index. Cytokinin hastened the flowerlngand maturlty, whereas CCC delayed it, Higher protein content in mature grains was also retordedunder the higher dose of cytokinin.
    1. A,OAc. (1965) Official and Tentative Methods of Analysis. t\ssQdation of qtficial Agriculture Chemists, Washington,
    2. D,C. pp, 354. . '
    3. Arnon, 01 (1949), PI. PhysioJ., 24: 1-15
    4. Bishnoi, NR etaI (1994)./ndianJ, PI, Physiol., 37: 73-75.
    5. Humphries. EC. (1968). Euphytica.17: 275-279.•
    6. KaUta, P. eta/. (1995).lndJan. J PI. PhysJol., 38: 197-202.
    7. Kujel, F (1976). Held Crop Abstracts, 29:306.
    8. Murumkar, c.v. and Chavan, P.O. (1988), Soc. Bot. Pol., 57: 127-135.
    9. Sarnant Asinhar, B al:d Shahu, G. (1990). lndianJ Agri/. Sci. 60: 217-219,
    10. Tripathi, RS, (19781. Ph. D. Thesis Kanpur Univ., Kanpur.
    11. Tripathi. RS. and Singh, A.K. (1989). Farm Sci. J., 4(1-2): 59-61.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)