Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 35 issue 2 (june 2001) : 71 - 78

EVALUATION OF SOME ELITE MULBERRY (MORUS ALBA L.) VARIETIES AND NPK LEVELS UNDER PARTIALLY IRRIGATED CONDITIONS FROM SERICULTURE VIEW POINT

P.S. Sinha!, S.K. Gangwarz, B.D. Singh, J. JaiswaP, U.P. Griyaghey
1Regional Sericultural Research Station; Centtal Silk Board, P.O. Hehal, Ranchi - 834 OD5.lndia

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Sinha! P.S., Gangwarz S.K., Singh B.D., JaiswaP J., Griyaghey U.P. (2024). EVALUATION OF SOME ELITE MULBERRY (MORUS ALBA L.) VARIETIES AND NPK LEVELS UNDER PARTIALLY IRRIGATED CONDITIONS FROM SERICULTURE VIEW POINT. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 35(2): 71 - 78. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Four elite mulberry varieties viz. S1, K2, C763 and C776 were evaluated under partially irrigated conditions at five fertiHzer levels, using spilt plot design, on the basis of vaious, growth parameters like extension growth, branching, no. of leaves, leaf area, hundered leaf weight, weight of 100 sq em laminar area, total photosynthetic area, total fresh leaf yield and moisture content of leaf. S1 variety was found to be the best mullberry variety from sericultire view point and NPK @ 150:50:50 kg/ha/yr in combination of FYM @ 10 MT/fia/yr was fOYnd to be the most cost, effective fertilizer level under partially irrigated coooitions. Role of different growth attribute in bringing out qualitative and quantitative changes in leaf production is also discussed.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Bhat, V.R. and Sulikeri, G.S. (1992). Karnataka J. Agric Sci. 5; 26-30.
    2. Bose, Pc. and Singhvi, N.R. (1989). Indian Silk 28(7t 37-39.
    3. Chaudhary, P.c. and Giridhar, K. (1987). In: Appropriate Sericulture Technique (M.S. Jolly ed.) International Centre
    4. for Training and Research in Tropical Sericulture Srirampuram, Mysore ·570008.
    5. Das P.K. et al. (1993). Indian J. Seric 2202-207.
    6. Hiremath, B.K. et al. (1992) Karnaraka J. Agric Sci. 5;72.
    7. Jiang, S. (1993). BuD Seric 24 (1); 10-13 (Chinese).
    8. Qaiyyum, MA (1990) Bull. Sericult. Res. 1: 70-77.
    9. Quader, M.A. et aI. Bull Sericult. Res. 1: 1-5.
    10. Rabman, M.S. et al. (1994). BuD. Sericult. Res. 5:9-13 (BangIa).
    11. Rajjana, L. et aI. (1992) Nat. Cant. on Mul. Ser. Res. Dec. 10-11, 1992 CSR and TI MYSOH~ pp 28.
    12. Shanker, MA etc. (1992). Nat. Cant. on Mul. Ser. Res. Dec. 10-11, 1992 CSR and TI Mysore pp 29.
    13. Singh A et al. (1995). Indian J. AgrQn 40; 613-615.
    14. Singh P.S. et aI. (1996). Indian J. Agron 41; 680-632.
    15. Sinha P.S. et al. (1996) J. Agric. Res. 30: 197-205.
    16. Upadhyaya, S.D. and Singh, V.P. (1977).Sci. Cult. 43: 353-354.
    17. Varangabhushana, H.S. (1992). Nat. Cant. on Mul. Ser. Res., Dec. 10-11, 1992, Mysore pp2
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)