Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 35 issue 1 (march 2001) : 44-47

BIOCHEMICAL RESISTANCE OF GRAPE GENOTYPES AGAINST ANTHRACNOSE

A.V. Bhavani Shankar, P.C. Jindal
1Division of Fruits and Horticultural Technology Indian Agricultural Re~earch Institute, New Delhi - 110 012, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Shankar Bhavani A.V., Jindal P.C. (2024). BIOCHEMICAL RESISTANCE OF GRAPE GENOTYPES AGAINST ANTHRACNOSE. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 35(1): 44-47. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field experiment conducted on Vertisol (Typic-Haplustert) under soybean-wheat fallow system has revealed that incorporation of both FYM and inorganic N had a positive role in increasing soil microbial biomass C (SMBS), N and P. The nutrient pool started increasing in the beginning of the crop and soil microbial biomass C was maximum during peak crop growth penod and decreased with the advancement of the crop growth. Enzyme activity was low under inotganic application and control iri the absence of C source. Combined application of FYM and nitrogen helped in building up and turnover of microbial biomass nutrient which inturn increased the nutnltnts status in soil.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Abusaleha, A et a/. (1989) Indian 1. Hort 46 : 222-224.
    2. Agrios, G.N. (1978) Plant Pathology (4 th ed.) ·Academic Press. New York: 93-114.
    3. Bhatia, 1.5. et a/. (1972). Indian Phytopath, 25 : 231-235.
    4. Bindra, A.S. and Kapoor, Sashi (1979). Res. Bull. Marathwada Aerie. Unlv. 3 : 53-54.
    5. Daulta, B.S. and Chauhan, K.S. (1981). Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 10 : 72-74.
    6. Dhillion, W.S et a/. (1992) Plant Dis. Res 7 ; 248-250
    7. Gupta P.C. et a/. (1992). Indian J. Agric. Res, 26 : 5'1-56.
    8. Jindal, P.C. (1993). Haryana J. Hort. ScI. 22: 21-24.
    9. Jindal, P.C. and Santhanam, G. (1993). In Golden Jubilee Symp. Horticultural Research-
    10. Changing I5cenario, May 24-28, 1993 at Bangalore. Abs. No.2. 22, pp-48.
    11. Kapustin, A.D. (1973). Zakhist Rostin Resp Miz.hvid TematNakam Zb No. 17 :71-74.
    12. Langcake, P. and McCarthy, W.V. (1979). Vitis. 18 : 244-253.
    13. Marutyan, S.A. et al. (1979) Biologicheskii, Zhurna/-Armenic, 32(8) : 801-806.
    14. Matta, A. and Diamon, A.E. (1963). Phytopath 53: 574-575
    15. Mohanraj, D., et al. (1972) Indian Phytopath. 24 : 339-342
    16. Ough, C.S. and Berg, H.W. (1979). Amer. J. Enol. Vitis., 30 : 4 : 321
    17. Pool, R.M. et a/. (1981). Vilis 20 : 136-145.
    18. Swain, 1. and Hills, W.E. (19.59). J. Sci. Food Agric., 10 63-68.
    19. Shannon, 8.M. et al. (1966). J. Bioi. Chem. 241 : 2166.
    20. Somogyi M. (1952). J. BioI. Chem., 195 19-23
    21. Suhag L.S. and Grower, R.K. (1972). Haryana J. Hort. ScI. 1 : 83-86.
    22. Swain, t. and Hills, W.E. ·.(1959). J. Sci. Food Agric. 10; 63-68.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)