Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 36 issue 4 (december 2002) : 254 - 258

EFFECT OF GROWTH REGUlATORS ON GROWTH YIELD AND METABOLISM IN SOYBEAN GENOTYPES

Pankaj Kumar, S.M. Hiremath, P.S. Deshmukh·, S.R. Kushwaha
1Division of Plant Physiology, Indian Agricultural Resear~h Institute, New Delhi - 110 012,lndia
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kumar Pankaj, Hiremath S.M., Deshmukh· P.S., Kushwaha S.R. (2024). EFFECT OF GROWTH REGUlATORS ON GROWTH YIELD AND METABOLISM IN SOYBEAN GENOTYPES. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 36(4): 254 - 258. doi: .
Field experiment was conducted with determinate and semldetermlnate soybean genotypes to study the effect of growth regulators on NR activity, chlorophyll content, rate of photosynthesis, growth and yield. The growth regulator treatments improved aU the parameters and the effect was seen more in determinate genotype. The seed yield was significantly higher with TIBA (50 ppm) application followed by MC (100 ppm) and CCC (250 ppm) which was associated with higher number of pods and seeds per plant.
    1. Arnon, 0.1. (1949). PI Physiol, 24: 1-15,
    2. Chandrababu, R etal (1995). MadrasAgric. J., 82: 229-230.
    3. Deotale, RD. etal (1995). J. Soils Crops, 5:172-176.
    4. Deotale, RD. et al. (1996). J. Soils Crops, 6: 89-93.
    5. EI-Kheir, M.SAA. etal (1994). EgyptianJ. Physiol Sciences, 18: 179-200.
    6. Goswami, B.K. and Srivastava, G.c. (1988). IndianJ. PI Physiol., 31: 281-284.
    7. Grossman, K, (1990). Physiol PI, 32: 325-329.
    8. Gu-Wei-Hong and Gu-W.H. (1998). ActaCAgriculturae-Shanghai, 2: 45-50.
    9. Koti (1997). Ph.D. Thesis Univ. Agric.Science, Dharwad, India.
    10. Kuchenbuch, Rand Jung, J. (1988). PI Soil, 109: 151-157.
    11. Kumari, S. and Bharti, S. (1992). HAUJ. Res., 22: 206-213.
    12. Mansour, FA et al (1994). EgyptianJ. Physiol. Sci., 18: 345-363.
    13. Reena-Tagade etal (1998). J. Soils Crops, 8: 172-175.
    14. Saha, K, and Gupta, K, (1998). /ndianJ. Pl. Physiol., 3: 107-111.
    15. Saradhambal, K,v. et al (1978)./ndian J. Biochem. Biophys., 15: 105-107.
    16. Sharma, K, and Walia, N. (1996). Environ. Ecol, 14: 307-310

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)