EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ON POWDERY MILDEW SEVERITY IN FIELD PEA UNDER IRRIGATED AND RAINFED CONDITIONS

A. Bhattacharya; P. Shukla1

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi
Print ISSN 0367-8245
Online ISSN 0976-058X
NAAS Rating 5.60
SJR 0.217, CiteScore (0.595)

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 36 issue 3 (september 2002) : 14.9 - 155

EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ON POWDERY MILDEW SEVERITY IN FIELD PEA UNDER IRRIGATED AND RAINFED CONDITIONS

A. Bhattacharya, P. Shukla1

Affiliations

¹Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur - 208 024, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Bhattacharya A., Shukla1 P. (2025). EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ON POWDERY MILDEW SEVERITY IN FIELD PEA UNDER IRRIGATED AND RAINFED CONDITIONS. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 36(3): 14.9 - 155. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Per cent severity of Erysiphe pisi, DC on Pisum sativum var. Type 163 leaves was studied at three seedling dates under irrigated and rainfed conditons. Severity was higher under rainfed and significantly varying under seeding dates and crop growth stages. Path analysis and per cent association estimation showed that severity is affected by minimum environmental temperature and maximum relative humidity. Under irrigated condition, maximum severity was under 37.4°C, 19.4°C, 53.0%, 25.0% and 11.8h, while under rainfed condition. It was under 37.0°C. 23.8°C 51.4%,25.0% and 11.9h (for maximum temperature minimum temperature, maximum relative humidity, minimum relative humidity and sunshine duration, respectively). Multiple correlation for severity under irrigated and rainfed conditions were 0.943 and 0.882, respectively

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Baker, R. (1978). In: Plnat Diseases: An Advance Treatise. Vol. JI. (Horshfall. J.G. and Cowling, E.B. ed,) Academic
Press, New York, pp. 137-158.
Bashi, E. and Rotem, J. (1976). Physiol. PI. Pathol., 8:83-90.
Cochen, Y. and Rotem, J. (1970). Phytopathology, 60:1600-1604.
Calhoum, J. (1973). AnnualRev. Phytopathology, 11:343-364.
Dewey, D.R. and Lu, KH. (1959). Agron. J. 51: 515-519.
Drandarevski, c.A. (1969). Phytopath. 2., 65:124-154; 210-218.
Penrra, KG. and Wheeler, B.E.J. (1975). Tran:Sr. Mycol. Soc., 64:313-319.
'rfotem, J. (1978). In: Plant Diseases: An Advance Treatise Vol. JI (Horshall J.G. and Cowling E.B. ed.) Academic
Press, New York, pp. 137-158.
Ruppel, E.G. et al. (1975). Plant Disease Rep. 59: 283-286.
Singh, R.A. et al. (1944). In: The Powdery Mildew of Pea. Indi~n Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India.
Snedecor, G.W and Cochran, WG. (1972). Statistical Methods Applied for Experiments in Agriculture and Biology.
Iowa State University, Iowa, USA.
Sprague, R. (1955). Bul! Wash. Agric. Exp. Stn. No. 560, pp. 36.
Weatherly, P.E. (1951). New Phytol, 50: 36-51.
Yarwood, C.E. (1957). Bot. Rev., 23: 235-301.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all ()

[
baker_1978] Baker, R. (1978). In: Plnat Diseases: An Advance Treatise. Vol. JI. (Horshfall. J.G. and Cowling, E.B. ed,) Academic

[2] Press, New York, pp. 137-158.

[3] Bashi, E. and Rotem, J. (1976). Physiol. PI. Pathol., 8:83-90.

[4] Cochen, Y. and Rotem, J. (1970). Phytopathology, 60:1600-1604.

[5] Calhoum, J. (1973). AnnualRev. Phytopathology, 11:343-364.

[6] Dewey, D.R. and Lu, KH. (1959). Agron. J. 51: 515-519.

[7] Drandarevski, c.A. (1969). Phytopath. 2., 65:124-154; 210-218.

[8] Penrra, KG. and Wheeler, B.E.J. (1975). Tran:Sr. Mycol. Soc., 64:313-319.

[9] 'rfotem, J. (1978). In: Plant Diseases: An Advance Treatise Vol. JI (Horshall J.G. and Cowling E.B. ed.) Academic

[10] Press, New York, pp. 137-158.

[11] Ruppel, E.G. et al. (1975). Plant Disease Rep. 59: 283-286.

[12] Singh, R.A. et al. (1944). In: The Powdery Mildew of Pea. Indi~n Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India.

[13] Snedecor, G.W and Cochran, WG. (1972). Statistical Methods Applied for Experiments in Agriculture and Biology.

[14] Iowa State University, Iowa, USA.

[15] Sprague, R. (1955). Bul! Wash. Agric. Exp. Stn. No. 560, pp. 36.

[16] Weatherly, P.E. (1951). New Phytol, 50: 36-51.

[17] Yarwood, C.E. (1957). Bot. Rev., 23: 235-301.

EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ON POWDERY MILDEW SEVERITY IN FIELD PEA UNDER IRRIGATED AND RAINFED CONDITIONS

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board