Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 36 issue 2 (june 2002) : 118 . 122

MANAGEMENT OF ROOT ROT [MACROPHOMINA PHASEOUNA (TASSI.) GOlD.] OFRICEFALLOW BlACKGRAMBY RESIDENT ISOlATES OF TROCHODERMA VIRlDE

C. Rettinassababady, N. Ramadoss·, S. Thirumeni
1Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Conege of Agriculture and Research Institute, Serumavllang~ P.O., Karaikal- 609 603, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Rettinassababady C., Ramadoss· N., Thirumeni S. (2024). MANAGEMENT OF ROOT ROT [MACROPHOMINA PHASEOUNA (TASSI.) GOlD.] OFRICEFALLOW BlACKGRAMBY RESIDENT ISOlATES OF TROCHODERMA VIRlDE. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 36(2): 118 . 122. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Seed treatment exploits the seed as the delivery system or deployment agent for variops meterials. Resident bioconftol isolates of Trichoderma viride (TV1, TV2, TV3) obtained from the rhizosphere regions of ricefallow blackgram {Vigna mungo (L) Hepper} of Karaikal District, Union territory of Pondicherry, alongwith T. viride (Coimbatore isolate-TVC) and T. harzianum (TH) tested for its efficacy as seed treatment against Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi.) Goid, the incitant of toot rot of blackgram (both in pots and field). Among the various isolates tested, seed treatment with lV3 recorded increased rhizosphere population of T. viride with reduced pathogenic population of M. phaseolina leading to reduction in per cent disease incidence throughout the crop growth under pot and field conditions.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Ahmad, J.S. and Bakar, R. (1987). Phytopathology. 77: 182-189.
    2. Anll Kumar, T.B. and Sastry, M.N.L. (1979). Phytopath. Z., 94:126-131.
    3. Anitha, R, Reddy, M.S. and Rao, KC. (1989). Indian J. Pl. Prot., 17: 155-158.
    4. Ayers, WA. and Adams, P,B. (1981). In: Biological control iri crop production Papavizas. G.c. (ed.), Totowa, Nj;
    5. AllanheId, Osmum, 461 p.
    6. Bhimsen, S., KaIpana Bhatnagar andShekhawat. KS. (1995). Indian J. MycoJ. Pl. Pathol., 25 (1): 110.
    7. Dhingra, O.D. and Khar,M.N. (1973). Phytopath Z.• 76:23-29.
    8. Dubey, RC. and D.vivedi, R.S. (1988). Int. J. Trop. Pl. Dis., 6: 89-94.
    9. Elad, Y, and Chet. I. (1983). Phytoparasitica.• 11: 55-58.
    10. Jacob, KC. (1989). Ph. D. Thesis, TNAU, Coimbatore, india, 214p.
    11. Jeyarajan, R, Ramakrishnan, G., Dinakaran, D. and Sridhar, R (1994). In: Biotechnology in India D.vivedi, BK
    12. (ed.) Bioved Research Society, Allahabad, India, 25736 pp.
    13. Kousalya, G. and Jeyarajan, R (1990). J. BioI Control, 5(1):4244.
    14. Meyer, W.A., Sinclair, J.B. and Khare, M.N. (1973). Phytopathology, 63: 613-620.
    15. Muthukrishnan, K, Arjunan, G. and Raguchander, T. (1995). Madras Agric. J., 82:495-496.
    16. Nakkeeran, S. (1992). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, TNAU, Coimbatore, India, 161 p.
    17. Papavizas, G.C. (1982). Phytopathology, 72: 121-125.
    18. Pineda, P.J.B. and Gonnella, E.R (1988). Agronomia Tropica/(Maracay),. 38:43-48.
    19. Prameela Devi, P. and Singh, R.H. (199~. Legume Res., 20(2): 71-76.
    20. Rovira, A.D. (1963). Pl. Soil, 19: 304·314.
    21. . Sangeetha, P. (1988). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, TNAU, Coimbatore, India, 141 p.
    22. Santosh, A.F., Das and Dhingra, O.D. (1982). Can. J. Bot., 60:472-475.
    23. Shankar, P. (1994). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, TNAU, Coimbatore, India, 141p.
    24. Vidya, R. (1995). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, TNAU, Coimbatore, India, 56-93 pp
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)