Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi
Print ISSN 0367-8245
Online ISSN 0976-058X
NAAS Rating 5.60
SJR 0.293

Frequency :

Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 37 issue 4 (december 2003) : 283·286

PHENOTYPIC STABIUTY FOR SEED YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS INYELLOW SARSON (BRASSICA CAMPESTRISUNN VAR. YEllOWSARSON PRAIN)

Dharmendra Singh-, V.K. Mishra

Affiliations

¹Department of Agricultural Botany, Janata Mahavidyalaya Ajltrnal, Auraiya - 206 121, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Singh- Dharmendra, Mishra V.K. (2024). PHENOTYPIC STABIUTY FOR SEED YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS INYELLOW SARSON (BRASSICA CAMPESTRISUNN VAR. YEllOWSARSON PRAIN). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 37(4): 283·286. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Ten genotypes of yellow sarson (Brassica campestris Linn. var yellow sarson were tested at three locations to evaluate the stability for 7 characters. The pooled analysis of variance showed differential behaviour of genotypes over the environments. Variation due to genotypes (G), environments (E) and GxE interactions are significant for most of the characters and a large portion of the interaction was due to linear regression. Significant GxE interactions (linear) indicated differential response of the varieties to changing environments. Environment + (GxE) was significant for all the characters except 1000-seed weight. None of the genotypes was stable for all the characters evaluated. The genotypes AJ14, AJL17, V1D-1 and YSIK-80 were found to be stable for seed yield/plant, secondary branches/plant and 1000-seed weight owing to the high mean value, unit regression and non-significant S 2di. These genotypes could be utilized for developing high yielding stable yellow sarson genotypes.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Breese, E.L. (1969). Heredity, 2: 27-30.
Campbell, H.G. and Lafever, H.N. (1977). Crop Sci., 17: 604-608.
Eberhart, SA and Russell, WA. (1966). Crop Sci., 6: 36-40.
Finely, KW and Wilkinson, G.M. (1963). Aust. J. Agric. Res., 14: 742·57.
Ghoshdastikar, KK and Sinhamahatra, S.P. (1991). J. OilseeedsRes., 8: 1-5.
Knight, R. (1970). Euphytica., 19: 225-235.
Mahto, J.L. and Haider, ZA (2000)./ndianJ. Agric. Sci., 70: 472-4.
Matsuo, T. (1975). In: Adaptabilityin Plants. (Matsno, T. eel). JIBPSynthers University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 173-177.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

PHENOTYPIC STABIUTY FOR SEED YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS INYELLOW SARSON (BRASSICA CAMPESTRISUNN VAR. YEllOWSARSON PRAIN)

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board