Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 37 issue 4 (december 2003) : 274 - 278

COMBINING ABILIlY AND HETEROSIS IN WHEAT

K.H. Singh·, T.B. Singh
1. Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, G. B. P. U. A. and T., Pantnagar - 263145, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Singh· K.H., Singh T.B. (2024). COMBINING ABILIlY AND HETEROSIS IN WHEAT. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 37(4): 274 - 278. doi: .
Combining ability and heterosis were studied in a 8 x 8 diallel set of wheat. Analysis of variance revealed the presence of significant variance due to gca among the parents and due to sea among the crosses for all the traits studied, except for effective tiller number for sea. Low estimates of predictability ratio indicated predominance of non-additive gene effects for grain yield, total dry matter, 100-seed weight, harvest index and days to maturity. Almost equal importance of additive and non-additive gene effects was observed for days to flower, flag leaf length, peduncle length and grains per spike, while, additive gene effects were predominant for plant height and effective tiller number, HD 2385 was identified as a good general combiner for grain yield. Significant heterosis over better parent and over standard variety was observed for all the traits, studied. The magnitude of heterosis was highest (74.4%) for grain yield over better parent and for toal dry matter (72.3%) over standard variety. The high magnitude (52.6%) of st andard heterosis was observed for grain yield.
    1. Baker, R.J. (1978). Crop. Sci., 18: 533-536.
    2. Griffing, B. (1956). Aust. J. Biol Sci., 9: 463-493.
    3. Jenson, N.F. (1970). Crop. Sci., 10: 629-635.
    4. Mani, S.C. and Rao, MV. (1975). /ndianJ. Genet., 35: 330-335.
    5. • PraSad, K.D. etal (1998). /ndianJ. Genet., 58: 97-100.
    6. Rathore, BKS. and Chauhan, S.S. (1986). Agric. J., 73: 425-429.
    7. Singh, RK and Chaudhary, B.D. (1985). Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi 318 p.
    8. Singh, K.B. and Kandola, H.S. (1961)./ndianJ. Genet., 29: 53-61.
    9. Singh, S. and Singh, R.B. (1978). /ndianJ. Genet., 38: 168-172.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)