Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 37 issue 3 (september 2003) : 214 - 218

RESPONSE OF KHASI MANDARIN (CITRUS RETICULATABLANCO) TO ORGANIC VERSUS INORGANICFERTILlZATJON

A.K. Dubey, D.S. Yadav
1Division of JjIorticuiture. ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region·, UmroiRoad, Urniam - 793 103,India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Dubey A.K., Yadav D.S. (2024). RESPONSE OF KHASI MANDARIN (CITRUS RETICULATABLANCO) TO ORGANIC VERSUS INORGANICFERTILlZATJON. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 37(3): 214 - 218. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field trial was conducted to study the response of Khasi mandarin to organic versus inorganic fertilization. Application of 110 kg pig manure recorded higher mean fruit yield (107 kg/tree), which was at par with application of 70 kg pig manure (106 kg/tree) over control (80.5 kg/tree). The nitrogen application at the rate of 750 gmN/tree produced higher yield (111 kg/tree) over application of 1000 gm N/tree (101 kg/tree) and control (91.80 kg/tree). Potassium application also had beneficial effect on fruit yield. The application of 650 gm K 2O had highest mean fruit yield/tree (107 kg) over control (94.9 kg). A combination of 110 kg pig manure + 750 gmN + 650 Kp produced highestfruit yield/tree (163 kg) and lowest fruit drop (19.73%).

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Allison. FE. (1973). In: Soil Organic Malter and Its Role in Crop Production. Elserier Scientific Publishing Co.. New York.
    2. Bevington. K (1994). Aust Citrus News. 60: 10-12.
    3. Chin, WT and Kroontje, W. (1963). Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 27: 316-318.
    4. Diedda, A.P. and Casu, M. (1980/1981). Studi Sassar Sez III. 28 81-88.
    5. Ghosh. S.N. (1990). HaryanaJ. Hart Sci., 19: 39-44.
    6. Ghosh. S.N. and Basera. KC. (199.7). In: Proc. Nat Symp. on CJfriculture. 17-19 Nov., 1997. Nagpur.
    7. Khanna et al (1984). J. Indian Soc. SoH Sci.. 32: 84-91.
    8. Lat, H. (1998). Prog. Hart, 30: 59-62
    9. Lat, H. and Sharma, R.M. (1985). Prog. Hart., 17: 326-340.
    10. Mann, M.S. and Sandhu, A.S. (1988). Punjab Hart. J., 28: 14-21.
    11. PatH etal (1997). In: Proc. Nat. Symp. on Citrieulture, 17-19 Nov., 1997. Nagpur Pp136-139.
    12. 218 INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
    13. Rangnna, S. (1994). In: Hand Bookof Analysis and Quality Ccmtrol for Fruit and Vegetable Product. TATA Mcgraw-Hill PublishingPp 105-106. ...
    14. Raychoudhari, S.P. (1976). In: Soil fertility Theory and Practice (Kanwar, J.S. ed.) ICAR,. NewDeihL Rouf et a/. (1982). BangladeshHort., 10: 19-21.
    15. Sharma, U.C. (1991). J. HJ1IRes., 4: 100-102.
    16. Sheo Govind era/. (1997). J. Hill Res., 10: 5-9.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)