Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi
Print ISSN 0367-8245
Online ISSN 0976-058X
NAAS Rating 5.60
SJR 0.293

Frequency :

Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 37 issure 1 (march 2003) : 68 - 71

GENETIC VARIABILITY, CORRELATION AND PATH COEFFICIENT STUDIES IN TOMATO

B.K. Mohanty*

Affiliations

¹Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Regional Research Station, Bhawanipatna - 766 001, Orissa, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Mohanty* B.K. (2024). GENETIC VARIABILITY, CORRELATION AND PATH COEFFICIENT STUDIES IN TOMATO. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 37(1): 68 - 71. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Evaluation of 18 genotypes of tomato over 2 years elucidated high heritability with high GCV and genetic gain for average fruit weight, plant height, number of fruits and branches/plant which could be improved by simple selection. The phenotypic and gentoypic associations of yield were significantly positive with number of fruits/plants and days to first harvest but significantly negative with plant height, number of branches/plant and average fruit weight. Number of fruits/plant was inversely related with average fruit weight. Determinate types were high yielders. Most early varieties were small fruited and low yielders. Path analysis confirmed that number of fruits/plant and average fruit weight registered positive direct effect on yield and negative indirect effect through each other on yield. Number of fruits/plant should be considered independently or in combination with average fruit weight and days to first harvest while imposing selection for amelioration of yield in tomato.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

AI-Jihouri, HA eta/. (1958). Agron. J., 50:477-483.
13urton, GW (1952). Proc. 6th Int. Gr. Ld. Cong., 1:277-283.
Das, B. eta/. (1998). Ann. Agric. Res., 19(1): 77-80.,
Dewey, DR and Lu, KH. (1959). Agron. J., 51: 515-518.
Dudi, B.S. and KaUoo (1982). Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 11:122-124.
Johnson, HW. eta/. (1955). Agron. J., 47:314-318.
Megeswari, K et a/. (1997). South Indian Hort., 45: 108-110.
Natarajan, S. (1991). South Indian Hort., 39: 27-19.
Padmini, K and Vadival, E. (1997). South Indian Hort., 45:1-4.
Prasad, V.S.R.K and Rai, M. (1999). Indian J. Hort., 56: 262-266..

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

GENETIC VARIABILITY, CORRELATION AND PATH COEFFICIENT STUDIES IN TOMATO

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board