Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 38 issue 1 (march 2004) : 34 - 39

LARVICIDAL EFFECT'OF CARTAP HYDROCHLORIDE ~ AND AZADIRACHTIN AGAINST LEPIDOPTERAN / PESTS INFESTING COLE CROPS IN HP

P
Pankaj Sooo
S
Sanjeev Sharma
A
AK. Verma
1Departme;'t ~f Entomology and Apiculture, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan - 173 230, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Sooo Pankaj, Sharma Sanjeev, Verma AK. (2025). LARVICIDAL EFFECT'OF CARTAP HYDROCHLORIDE ~ AND AZADIRACHTIN AGAINST LEPIDOPTERAN / PESTS INFESTING COLE CROPS IN HP. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 38(1): 34 - 39. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Cabbage butterfly, Pieris brassicae Linn. and diamond back moth, Plutella xylostella L. are the major pests of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L) and cauliflower (B. oleracea var. botrytis L.) grown as off season crops in mid and high hills of Himachal Pradesh. Indiscriminate use of organochlorine, organophosphate and carbamate insecticides have resultedin residual toxicity and human health hazards. The present studies on the larvicidal effect of cartap hydrochloride and azadirachtin against P. brassicae and P. xylostella were conducted under laboratory conditions during 1994–95. The studies revealed that cartap hydrochloride and azadirachtin are effective larvicides. The LC 50 values of cartap hydrochloride for second, third, fourth and fifth instars larvae of P. brassicae were 6.523, 16.013, 55.461 and 80.608 ppm, respectively. The corresponding values of LC 50 against Second to fourth instar laniae of P. xylostellawere 5.070, 11.231 and 49.521 ppm, respectively. The LC 50 values of azadirachtin against second to fourth instar larvae of P. brassicaewere 1.581, 2.097 and 3.099 ppm, respectively, whereas against second and third larval instar of P. xylostella, the LC 50 values were 1.242 and 1.802 ppm, respectively. Both the chemicals were found to be highly toxic to the larval instars; however, azadirachtin was more toxic of the two insecticides against used instars of both the test species

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Abbott, W.S. (1925).J. £Con. Ent., 18:265-267.
    2. Chandrasekaran, J. et aI. (1994). Pestology., 18:5-8.
    3. Endo, S. (1983). Int. Rice Res. News!., 8: 14-15.
    4. Fagoonee, L (1983). In: Proc. 2'" Natn. Neern Coni Rauirchholzhausem, 1983. pp. 211-233.
    5. Finney, D.J. (1952). Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press. pp. 318.
    6. Gujilr"G.J. and Mehrotra, K.N.. (1983).lndianJ. Ent, 43: 431-435
    7. Kubo, L and Klocke, J.A. (1982). Agric Bio!. Chern., 216: 1951-1953.
    8. Nagano, M. and Sakai, M. (1974). J. Takeda Res. Lab., 33:252-259.
    9. Rajavel, D.S. and Suncirababu, P.C. (1989). Veg. Sci., 16: 201·204.
    10. Ruscoe,c.N.E. (1972). Nature., 236: 159-160.
    11. Singh, D. and Bhathal, 5.5. (1992). In: Proc. Int. Symp. APe/opathyinAgroecosystems(Tamo, R. and Narwal, 5.5. Ed.). Feb 12-14,1992, HiSilr,lndia.
    12. Singh, R.P. eta/. (1988). PhytopariSSitica" 16: 225-229.
    13. Skatulla, U. and Meisner, J. (1975). Anz. Schadlingskd. Pflanz. Umweftrchutz., 48: 38-40.
    Published In
    Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 38 issue 1 (march 2004) : 34 - 39

      LARVICIDAL EFFECT'OF CARTAP HYDROCHLORIDE ~ AND AZADIRACHTIN AGAINST LEPIDOPTERAN / PESTS INFESTING COLE CROPS IN HP

      P
      Pankaj Sooo
      S
      Sanjeev Sharma
      A
      AK. Verma
      1Departme;'t ~f Entomology and Apiculture, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan - 173 230, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Sooo Pankaj, Sharma Sanjeev, Verma AK. (2025). LARVICIDAL EFFECT'OF CARTAP HYDROCHLORIDE ~ AND AZADIRACHTIN AGAINST LEPIDOPTERAN / PESTS INFESTING COLE CROPS IN HP. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 38(1): 34 - 39. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Cabbage butterfly, Pieris brassicae Linn. and diamond back moth, Plutella xylostella L. are the major pests of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L) and cauliflower (B. oleracea var. botrytis L.) grown as off season crops in mid and high hills of Himachal Pradesh. Indiscriminate use of organochlorine, organophosphate and carbamate insecticides have resultedin residual toxicity and human health hazards. The present studies on the larvicidal effect of cartap hydrochloride and azadirachtin against P. brassicae and P. xylostella were conducted under laboratory conditions during 1994–95. The studies revealed that cartap hydrochloride and azadirachtin are effective larvicides. The LC 50 values of cartap hydrochloride for second, third, fourth and fifth instars larvae of P. brassicae were 6.523, 16.013, 55.461 and 80.608 ppm, respectively. The corresponding values of LC 50 against Second to fourth instar laniae of P. xylostellawere 5.070, 11.231 and 49.521 ppm, respectively. The LC 50 values of azadirachtin against second to fourth instar larvae of P. brassicaewere 1.581, 2.097 and 3.099 ppm, respectively, whereas against second and third larval instar of P. xylostella, the LC 50 values were 1.242 and 1.802 ppm, respectively. Both the chemicals were found to be highly toxic to the larval instars; however, azadirachtin was more toxic of the two insecticides against used instars of both the test species

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Abbott, W.S. (1925).J. £Con. Ent., 18:265-267.
        2. Chandrasekaran, J. et aI. (1994). Pestology., 18:5-8.
        3. Endo, S. (1983). Int. Rice Res. News!., 8: 14-15.
        4. Fagoonee, L (1983). In: Proc. 2'" Natn. Neern Coni Rauirchholzhausem, 1983. pp. 211-233.
        5. Finney, D.J. (1952). Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press. pp. 318.
        6. Gujilr"G.J. and Mehrotra, K.N.. (1983).lndianJ. Ent, 43: 431-435
        7. Kubo, L and Klocke, J.A. (1982). Agric Bio!. Chern., 216: 1951-1953.
        8. Nagano, M. and Sakai, M. (1974). J. Takeda Res. Lab., 33:252-259.
        9. Rajavel, D.S. and Suncirababu, P.C. (1989). Veg. Sci., 16: 201·204.
        10. Ruscoe,c.N.E. (1972). Nature., 236: 159-160.
        11. Singh, D. and Bhathal, 5.5. (1992). In: Proc. Int. Symp. APe/opathyinAgroecosystems(Tamo, R. and Narwal, 5.5. Ed.). Feb 12-14,1992, HiSilr,lndia.
        12. Singh, R.P. eta/. (1988). PhytopariSSitica" 16: 225-229.
        13. Skatulla, U. and Meisner, J. (1975). Anz. Schadlingskd. Pflanz. Umweftrchutz., 48: 38-40.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)