Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 38 issue 1 (march 2004) : 28 - 33

WEED-FERTILIZER INTERACTION INTRAN$PLANTED PADDY UNDER TEMPERATE CONDITIONS OF KASHMIR HIMALAYA

Zafar Reshi, B.L.·Sapru
1DePartment ofBotany, University of Kashl'llir, Srinagar - 190006, J&K, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Reshi Zafar, B.L.·Sapru (2024). WEED-FERTILIZER INTERACTION INTRAN$PLANTED PADDY UNDER TEMPERATE CONDITIONS OF KASHMIR HIMALAYA. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 38(1): 28 - 33. doi: .
The paper discusses the influence of increased fertilization on weed spectrum, dry matter accumulation and nutrient depletion by the associated weeds, besides grain yield of the crop. Studied indicate that increase in the nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer dose resulted in dominance of Lemna gibba, masking the predominance of weedslike Echinochloa crusgalli, Marsilea quadrifoliata and Potamogeton nodosus which are otherwise dominant weeds associated with the paddy crop. Though increased fertilization of the crop resulted in decreased uptake of all investigated macro- and micronutrients but crop yield also showed a significant decline hence warranting adoption of a rational programme of fertilizer application.
    1. Alkamper, J. and Lang, Do van. (1978). In: Troiseme Symposium sur Ie Desherbage des Cultures Tropicales., Dakar, pp 188-193.
    2. Gautam, K.C. et aI. (1974). Indian J. Weea'Sci., 6: 121-123. Vol. 38, No.1, 2004 33
    3. Mishra, J.S. and Kurchania, S.P. (1999)./ndianJ. Weed Sci., 31: 191-195.
    4. Moody, K. (1981). Weed-fertilizer Interactions in Rice; IRRI Research Paper Series. No. 68.
    5. Okafor, L.1. and De Datta, S.K. n976). Weed Sci., 24: 43-46.
    6. Pande, H.K. and Bhan, v'M. (1966). Riso" 15: 47-67.
    7. Pandey, LB. eta/. (2000). /ndianJ. WeedSci., 32: 31-34.
    8. Patel, C.L. et a/. (1983). Indian J. Weed Sci., 15: 199-202.
    9. Radosevich, S.R and Holt, J.S. (1984). Weed Ecology: Implications for Vegetation Management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York.
    10. Singh, O.P. eta/. (1975)./ndianJ. WeedSci., 1: 110-114.
    11. Varamisra, V. (1976). The growth and CI1turaI cootrol of IoIIE!OOs in rice. M. Agr., University of ~, Australia, pp 175.
    12. Vega, M.R. and Punzalan, F.L. (1968). Proc. Br. Weed Control Coni., 9: 682-686.
    13. Vega, M.R. et a/. (1971). In: Weed Science Report 1970-71. Department of Agricultural Botany, University of the . Philippines, College of Agriculture, Laguna, Philippines, pp 32-34.
    14. Walia, U.S. and GiU, H.S. (1985). IndianJ. WeedSci, 17: 12-17

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)