Banner

Chief Editor:
V. Geethalakshmi
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Coimbatore, INDIA
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Go...
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 39 issue 1 (march 2005) : 52 - 55

RECURRENT SELECTION IN PEARL MILLET

Yagya Dutt, C.R. Bainiwal
1Department of Plant Breeding, C.C.5. Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar - 125 004, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Dutt Yagya, Bainiwal C.R. (2025). RECURRENT SELECTION IN PEARL MILLET. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(1): 52 - 55. doi: .
The efficiency of various intra-population selection procedures were compared for grain yield and its contributing panicle traits in pearl millet. Three progeny selection procedures i.e. half-sib (HS), full-sib (FS) and S 1 were studied. Mean, genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV), phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV), heritability and expected genetic advance were worked out. The highest mean, genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV), phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) were observed in S 1 progeny selection followed by FS and HS. Estimates of heritability and expected genetic advance for grain yield and most of its contributing traits were also higher in S 1 progeny selection. Thus, among these three intra-population improvement selection procedure, S 1 selection procedure appear to be superior as compared to FS and HS progeny selection procedures.
    1. Bhamre, D.N. and Harinarayana, G. (1992). J. Maharastra Agric. Univ., 17: 192-194.
    2. Bidinger, F.R. and Raju, D.S. (2000). Crop Sci., 40: 68-71.
    3. Gill, K.S. (1980). In: Trends in Genetic Research in Pennisetum (Gupta, VP. and Minocha, J.L. OOs.) Punjab Agricultural
    4. Univ., Ludhiana, 67-78.
    5. Hallauer, AR. and Miranda, J.B. (1981). Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. Iowa University Press, Ames. 468 pp.
    6. Harer, P.N. and Karad, S.R. (1999). J. Maharastra Agric. Univ., 23: 132-135.
    7. Hepziba et a/. (1995). J. Maharastra Agric. Univ., 20: 183-185.
    8. Jindla, L.N. (1981). Ph.D. Thesis, PAU, Ludhiana.
    9. Johnson, H.w. eta/. (1955a). Agron. J., 47: 314-18.
    10. Johnson, H.w. et aI. (1955b). Agron. J., 47: 477-83.
    11. Kapoor, R.L. et aJ. (1983). H AU J. Res., 13: 424-428.
    12. Navale, P.A. et al. (1995). J. Maharastra Agrlc. Univ., 20: 43-46.
    13. Rao, TVS.R. (1978). Ph.D. Thesis, PAU, Ludhiana.
    14. Sandhu, P.S. and Phul, P.S. (1984). Indian J. Genet., 44: 73-79.
    15. Sastry, E.v.D. eta/. (1987). Curro Sci., 56: 778-779.
    16. Solanki, Y.P.S. (1998). Ph.D. Thesis, CCS HAU, Hisar.
    17. Suthamathi, P. and Dorairaj, M.S. (1995). Madras Agric. J., 82: 238·240.
    18. Zaveri, P.P. et al. (1988). Indian J. Genet., 48: 175-180.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)