Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 39 issue 1 (march 2005) : 1-9

RELATIONSHIP OF SUNFLOWER MOSAIC POTYVIRUS (SMPV) WITH ITS APHID VECTOR APHIS CRACCIVORA KOCH

R
R.K. Singh
S
S.J. Singh
S
Satya Prakash
1IARI Regional Station, Agriculture College Estate, Shivajinagar, Pune - 411 005. India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Singh R.K., Singh S.J., Prakash Satya (2025). RELATIONSHIP OF SUNFLOWER MOSAIC POTYVIRUS (SMPV) WITH ITS APHID VECTOR APHIS CRACCIVORA KOCH. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(1): 1-9. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Studies conducted on the relationship of sunflower mosaic potyvirus with its aphid vector, Aphis craccivoraKoch. indicated that the pre-acquisition starvation of aphid vector was essential for successful transmission of SMV. The optimum pre-acquisition starvation period was found to be 90 minutes. The aphids acquired and transmitted the virus in a very short feeding period of 20 and 40 seconds respectively. The optimum acquisition and inoculation feeding periods were found to be 10–20 and 15 minutes respectively. Even a single viruliferous aphid was capable of transmitting the virus. However, the maximum transmission was obtained when 15 aphids per plant were employed. The infecttvity of aphid vector was lost when they were given post-acquisition fasting beyond 2 hours. In serial transfers of single viruliferous aphids to healthy test plants, it was observed that when the interval of feeding on successive plants was 15 minutes and above, the aphids transmitted the virus to the first plant of the series only

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Arnott, H.J.and Smith, KM. (1967). J. Ultrastructure Res., 19: 173-195.
    2. Bradley, R.H.E. (1954). Can. J. lool., 32: 64-73.
    3. Bradley, R.H.E. (1959). Virology, 8: 308-309.
    4. Brunt, AA et a/. (1996). Viruses of Plants, CAB. InternationaL U.K.. pp. 1209·1212.
    5. Chad, J. et a/. (1990). Sbornik UVfll Ochnina Rosilin., 26: 11-16.
    6. Cockebain. AJ. et aI. (1963). Ann. AppJ. BioI., 52: 133-143.
    7. Collar, J.L. eta/. (1997). Environ Ent. 26: 537-544.
    8. Day, M.F. and Irzykiewicz, H. (1954). Aust. J. BioI. Sci.• 1: 251-273.
    9. Dujovny. G. et a/. (1998). Plant Disease, 82: 470-474.
    10. Fereres. A et a/. (1992). J. £Con. Entomol., 85: 759-765.
    11. Freitag, H.J. and Severin, H.H.P. (1945). Hi/gardia, 16: 375-385.
    12. Harris, KF. (1977). In: Aphids as Virus Vectors. (Harris. KF. and Maramorosch, Ked.) Academic, New York.
    13. pp. 165-220.
    14. Harris. KF. and Bath. J.E. (1973). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 66: 269-278.
    15. Hitchborn. J.H. (1958). Ann. Appl. BioI., 46: 563-570.
    16. Kolte. S.J. U(85). \n : Diseases 0\ Annual Edible Oilseed Crops. Vol. m, CRC Press. Florida, pp. 194.
    17. Lopez-Abella. D. et al. (1988). In: Advances in Disease Vector Research. (Harris K.F. ed.). Vol. 5, Springer, New York. pp. 251-285.
    18. Miller, PW. (1952). Plant Dis. Reptr., 36: 92-93.
    19. Nagrajan. K and Ramakrishnan, K (1971). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Sect. B. 73: 84-95.
    20. Nagaraju et a/. (1997). Indian Phytopathology, 50: 277-281 .
    21. Namba, R. (1962). Virology, 16: 267-271. Vol. 39, No.!. 2005 9'
    22. Powell, G. (1991). Ann. Appl. BioI., 119: 313-321.
    23. Powell, G. et aJ. (1992). Ent. Exp. Appl., 62: 293-300.
    24. Powell, G. et a/. (1995). Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 101: 411-420.
    25. Powell, G. (1991 a). Ann. AppJ. BioI., 119: 313-321.
    26. Scheller. H.v. and Slnikle, R.H. (1986). Ent. Exp. Appl., 40: 189-195.
    27. Singh, S.J. (1981). J. Turkish Phytopath., 10: 93-109.
    28. Singh, S.J. (1982a). Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflenzenschutz., 89: 79-87.
    29. Singh, S.J. (1982b). Acta Ent. Jugoslavia, 18: 81-89.
    30. Singh, S.J. et a/. (2002). In : XN Annual Confer. and National Semi.. Indian Virological Society, held at Bangalore, 18-20 Jan., 2002, p. 26.
    31. Storey, H.H. (1939). Bot. Rev., 5: 240-272.
    32. Sylvester, E.S. (1950). Phytopathology, 40: 743-745.
    33. Sylvester. E.S. (1954). Hilgardia. 23: 53-58.
    34. Vander Want. J.P.H. (1954). Ph. D. Thesis. Wageningen Agric. Univ. Wageningen. Netherlands, pp. 84.
    35. Watson. M.A. (1936). Hy. III - Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B. 226: 456-489.
    36. Wa.tson. M.A. and Roberts. EM. (1939). Proc. RQY. Soc. (London). B. 127: 543-576.
    37. Watson. M.A. and Roberts: EM. (1940). Ann. Appl. BioI., 27: 223-227.
    38. Zeyen. R.J. and Merger, PH (1990). Phytopathology, 80: 769-771
    Published In
    Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 39 issue 1 (march 2005) : 1-9

      RELATIONSHIP OF SUNFLOWER MOSAIC POTYVIRUS (SMPV) WITH ITS APHID VECTOR APHIS CRACCIVORA KOCH

      R
      R.K. Singh
      S
      S.J. Singh
      S
      Satya Prakash
      1IARI Regional Station, Agriculture College Estate, Shivajinagar, Pune - 411 005. India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Singh R.K., Singh S.J., Prakash Satya (2025). RELATIONSHIP OF SUNFLOWER MOSAIC POTYVIRUS (SMPV) WITH ITS APHID VECTOR APHIS CRACCIVORA KOCH. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(1): 1-9. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Studies conducted on the relationship of sunflower mosaic potyvirus with its aphid vector, Aphis craccivoraKoch. indicated that the pre-acquisition starvation of aphid vector was essential for successful transmission of SMV. The optimum pre-acquisition starvation period was found to be 90 minutes. The aphids acquired and transmitted the virus in a very short feeding period of 20 and 40 seconds respectively. The optimum acquisition and inoculation feeding periods were found to be 10–20 and 15 minutes respectively. Even a single viruliferous aphid was capable of transmitting the virus. However, the maximum transmission was obtained when 15 aphids per plant were employed. The infecttvity of aphid vector was lost when they were given post-acquisition fasting beyond 2 hours. In serial transfers of single viruliferous aphids to healthy test plants, it was observed that when the interval of feeding on successive plants was 15 minutes and above, the aphids transmitted the virus to the first plant of the series only

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Arnott, H.J.and Smith, KM. (1967). J. Ultrastructure Res., 19: 173-195.
        2. Bradley, R.H.E. (1954). Can. J. lool., 32: 64-73.
        3. Bradley, R.H.E. (1959). Virology, 8: 308-309.
        4. Brunt, AA et a/. (1996). Viruses of Plants, CAB. InternationaL U.K.. pp. 1209·1212.
        5. Chad, J. et a/. (1990). Sbornik UVfll Ochnina Rosilin., 26: 11-16.
        6. Cockebain. AJ. et aI. (1963). Ann. AppJ. BioI., 52: 133-143.
        7. Collar, J.L. eta/. (1997). Environ Ent. 26: 537-544.
        8. Day, M.F. and Irzykiewicz, H. (1954). Aust. J. BioI. Sci.• 1: 251-273.
        9. Dujovny. G. et a/. (1998). Plant Disease, 82: 470-474.
        10. Fereres. A et a/. (1992). J. £Con. Entomol., 85: 759-765.
        11. Freitag, H.J. and Severin, H.H.P. (1945). Hi/gardia, 16: 375-385.
        12. Harris, KF. (1977). In: Aphids as Virus Vectors. (Harris. KF. and Maramorosch, Ked.) Academic, New York.
        13. pp. 165-220.
        14. Harris. KF. and Bath. J.E. (1973). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 66: 269-278.
        15. Hitchborn. J.H. (1958). Ann. Appl. BioI., 46: 563-570.
        16. Kolte. S.J. U(85). \n : Diseases 0\ Annual Edible Oilseed Crops. Vol. m, CRC Press. Florida, pp. 194.
        17. Lopez-Abella. D. et al. (1988). In: Advances in Disease Vector Research. (Harris K.F. ed.). Vol. 5, Springer, New York. pp. 251-285.
        18. Miller, PW. (1952). Plant Dis. Reptr., 36: 92-93.
        19. Nagrajan. K and Ramakrishnan, K (1971). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Sect. B. 73: 84-95.
        20. Nagaraju et a/. (1997). Indian Phytopathology, 50: 277-281 .
        21. Namba, R. (1962). Virology, 16: 267-271. Vol. 39, No.!. 2005 9'
        22. Powell, G. (1991). Ann. Appl. BioI., 119: 313-321.
        23. Powell, G. et aJ. (1992). Ent. Exp. Appl., 62: 293-300.
        24. Powell, G. et a/. (1995). Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 101: 411-420.
        25. Powell, G. (1991 a). Ann. AppJ. BioI., 119: 313-321.
        26. Scheller. H.v. and Slnikle, R.H. (1986). Ent. Exp. Appl., 40: 189-195.
        27. Singh, S.J. (1981). J. Turkish Phytopath., 10: 93-109.
        28. Singh, S.J. (1982a). Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflenzenschutz., 89: 79-87.
        29. Singh, S.J. (1982b). Acta Ent. Jugoslavia, 18: 81-89.
        30. Singh, S.J. et a/. (2002). In : XN Annual Confer. and National Semi.. Indian Virological Society, held at Bangalore, 18-20 Jan., 2002, p. 26.
        31. Storey, H.H. (1939). Bot. Rev., 5: 240-272.
        32. Sylvester, E.S. (1950). Phytopathology, 40: 743-745.
        33. Sylvester. E.S. (1954). Hilgardia. 23: 53-58.
        34. Vander Want. J.P.H. (1954). Ph. D. Thesis. Wageningen Agric. Univ. Wageningen. Netherlands, pp. 84.
        35. Watson. M.A. (1936). Hy. III - Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B. 226: 456-489.
        36. Wa.tson. M.A. and Roberts. EM. (1939). Proc. RQY. Soc. (London). B. 127: 543-576.
        37. Watson. M.A. and Roberts: EM. (1940). Ann. Appl. BioI., 27: 223-227.
        38. Zeyen. R.J. and Merger, PH (1990). Phytopathology, 80: 769-771
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)