LEAF SODIUM CONTENT OF SUGARCANE GENETIC STOCKS AT GRAND GROWTH PERIOD AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH OTHER NUTRIENTS AND CANE AND SUGAR YIELD

S. Thangavelu; K. Chiranjivi Rao; P. Rakkiyappan

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi
Print ISSN 0367-8245
Online ISSN 0976-058X
NAAS Rating 5.60
SJR 0.217, CiteScore (0.595)

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 40 issue 3 (september 2006) : 220 - 223

LEAF SODIUM CONTENT OF SUGARCANE GENETIC STOCKS AT GRAND GROWTH PERIOD AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH OTHER NUTRIENTS AND CANE AND SUGAR YIELD

S. Thangavelu, K. Chiranjivi Rao, P. Rakkiyappan

Affiliations

¹Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore - 641 007, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Thangavelu S., Rao Chiranjivi K., Rakkiyappan P. (2025). LEAF SODIUM CONTENT OF SUGARCANE GENETIC STOCKS AT GRAND GROWTH PERIOD AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH OTHER NUTRIENTS AND CANE AND SUGAR YIELD. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 40(3): 220 - 223. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Thirty genetic stocks of sugarcane were analysed for sodium content. Differences in leaf
sodium content among clones as well as stages and their interaction were significant. The range
of leaf sodium content was from 0.288 % in Co 6806 to 0.430 % in Co 975. Clones Co 6806,
Co 7508, Co C 671, Co 7204, Co 7201, Co J 64, Co 617, Co 62174, Co 7717, Co 6304,
Co A 7601 and Co 853 had low sodium content. Sodium content in leaf increased from 0.290
at the 4th month to 0.451 at the 7th month. Leaf sodium content had significant positive
association with calcium, magnesium, chloride, sum of cations, sum of anions and negative
association with nitrogen and yield of cane and sugar. However, leaf sodium concentration had
no significant association with leaf phosphate, potassium, sulphate and silicon content at any of
the stage.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Akhtar, S. et al. (2003). Biologia Plantarum, 46: 113-116.
Bernstein, Leon et al. (1966). Agron. J., 58: 503-507.
Bishop, R.T. (1964). South Afri. Sug. Tech. Assoc., 38: 126-133.
Bishop, R.T. (1965). Proc. Int. Soc. Sugarcane Tech., 12: 188-196.
Chowdhury, M.K.A. et al. (2001). Sugarcane International, July, 2001, 15-16.
Clements, H. F. (1980). Sugarcane Crop Logging and Crop Control. Principles and Practices. The University Press of Hawaii, Honalulu.
Dang, Y. et al. (1998). Proc. Ann. Conv. Sugar Tech. Assoc. of India, 60: A123-A135.
Mengel, K. and Kirkby, E.A. (1978). Principles of Plant Nutrition. International Potash Institute, Bern. Switzerland.
Shrivastava, A.K. et al. (1989). Sugarcane, (July - August), 3-5.
Valdivia, V. (1977). In: Proc. Int. Soc. Sugarcane Tech., 16: 861-866.
Van dillewijn, C. (1952). Botany of Sugarcane, the Chronica Botanica Con. Waltham Mass. U.S.A.
Vogel, A.I. (1975). A Text Book of Quantitative Inorganic Analysis, Longmann, London.
Weber, H. and Sarruge, J.H. (1985). Sources and doses of sodium. II. On the concentration of nutrients in different cultivars of sugarcane (Saccharum sp) STAB, 3(4): 26-29, 32-34, 36-38.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all ()

[
akhtar_2003] Akhtar, S. et al. (2003). Biologia Plantarum, 46: 113-116.

[2] Bernstein, Leon et al. (1966). Agron. J., 58: 503-507.

[3] Bishop, R.T. (1964). South Afri. Sug. Tech. Assoc., 38: 126-133.

[4] Bishop, R.T. (1965). Proc. Int. Soc. Sugarcane Tech., 12: 188-196.

[5] Chowdhury, M.K.A. et al. (2001). Sugarcane International, July, 2001, 15-16.

[6] Clements, H. F. (1980). Sugarcane Crop Logging and Crop Control. Principles and Practices. The University Press of Hawaii, Honalulu.

[7] Dang, Y. et al. (1998). Proc. Ann. Conv. Sugar Tech. Assoc. of India, 60: A123-A135.

[8] Mengel, K. and Kirkby, E.A. (1978). Principles of Plant Nutrition. International Potash Institute, Bern. Switzerland.

[9] Shrivastava, A.K. et al. (1989). Sugarcane, (July - August), 3-5.

[10] Valdivia, V. (1977). In: Proc. Int. Soc. Sugarcane Tech., 16: 861-866.

[11] Van dillewijn, C. (1952). Botany of Sugarcane, the Chronica Botanica Con. Waltham Mass. U.S.A.

[12] Vogel, A.I. (1975). A Text Book of Quantitative Inorganic Analysis, Longmann, London.

[13] Weber, H. and Sarruge, J.H. (1985). Sources and doses of sodium. II. On the concentration of nutrients in different cultivars of sugarcane (Saccharum sp) STAB, 3(4): 26-29, 32-34, 36-38.

LEAF SODIUM CONTENT OF SUGARCANE GENETIC STOCKS AT GRAND GROWTH PERIOD AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH OTHER NUTRIENTS AND CANE AND SUGAR YIELD

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board