Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 41 issue 2 (june 2007) : 122 - 126

INFLUENCE OF SEED HARDENING AND PELLETING ON SEED YIELD AND QUALITY IN GREENGRAM {VIGNA RADIATA (L.) HEPPER} CV. CO 6

P. Srimathi, S. Kavitha, J. Renugadevi
1Department of Seed Science and Technology, Tamilnadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641 003, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Srimathi P., Kavitha S., Renugadevi J. (2024). INFLUENCE OF SEED HARDENING AND PELLETING ON SEED YIELD AND QUALITY IN GREENGRAM {VIGNA RADIATA (L.) HEPPER} CV. CO 6. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 41(2): 122 - 126. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The seeds of greengram cv. CO 6 were given hardening and pelleting treatments viz., hardening with MnSO4 100 ppm and hardening with 1 per cent Prosopis leaf extract + pelleting with DAP (40 g) + MnSO4 (100 mg) + FeSO4 (100 mg) + Ammonium molybdate (250 mg) and sown along with dry seeds (control) in a field experiment under rain fed condition. The results revealed that Prosopis hardened cum pelleted seeds recorded higher field emergence, survival, chlorophyll content, seed number pod-1 , pod yield and seed yield compared to MnSO4 hardening and control. The seed yield ha-1 in the best treatment was 862 kg ha-1, which was 21.4 per cent increase over the control and 19.1 per cent increase over MnSO4 hardening.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. AbduI-Baki, A.A. and Anderson, J.D. (1973). Crop Sci., 13: 630-633.
    2. Basariabegam, J. (2001). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
    3. Chinoy, J.J. et al. (1968). Indian J. Pl. Physiol., 11: 216-239.
    4. Dawson, M.J. (1965). Indian J. Pl. Physiol., 8: 52-56.
    5. Jegathambal, R. (1996). Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
    6. Jeyabal, A. et al. (1992). J. Agron. Crop Sci., 169: 145-150.
    7. Kamaiam, J. (1991). Legume Res., 14: 153-154.
    8. Kavitha, S. (2002). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
    9. Krishnasastry, K.S. et al. (1969). Mysore J. Agric. Sci., 11: 47-49.
    10. Kuppusamy, G. (1989). Ministry of Energy, New Delhi, pp. 108.
    11. Kuppusamy, G. et al. (1992). Madras Agric. J., 79(4): 183-187.
    12. Mucke, J.D. (1987). J. Agron. Crop Sci., 161: 79-83. Vol. 41, No. 2, 2007 125
    13. Mukhopadhyay, T.P. et al. (1990). My Forest, 26:148-152.
    14. Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1985). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR Publication, New Delhi, pp. 327-340.
    15. Ponnuswamy, A.S. and Vijaya. J. (1997). Madras Agric, J., 84: 393-395.
    16. Sabir-Ahamed, A. (1999). Legume Res., 22: 109-112.
    17. Seshidhar, U.R. et al. (1978). Indian J. Pl. Physiol., 16: 89-92.
    18. Usha, R. et al. (1999). Indian J. Pl. Physiol., 4: 45-99.
    19. Vanangamudi, K. and Karivaratharaju. T.V. (1986). Seed Sci. Technol., 14: 477-482.
    20. Vijayakumar, A. (1982). M.Sc., (Ag.) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)