Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 42 issue 3 (september 2008) : 189 -194

SHELF LIFE OF AONLA FRUITS: INFLUENCED BY POST HARVEST TREATMENTS AND PACKAGING MATERIALS

S
S. S. Dhumal
A
A.R. Karale
V
V. K. Garande
B
B. T. Patil
S
S. D. Masalkar
D
D.B. Kshirsagar
1Department of Horticulture, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri-413 722, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Dhumal S. S., Karale A.R., Garande K. V., Patil T. B., Masalkar D. S., Kshirsagar D.B. (2025). SHELF LIFE OF AONLA FRUITS: INFLUENCED BY POST HARVEST TREATMENTS AND PACKAGING MATERIALS. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 42(3): 189 -194. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The effect of wax emulsion alone and in combination with post harvest chemicals and different
packagings on physico-chemical characters and marketability of aonla under ambient storage conditions
was studied. The physico-chemical changes were faster in untreated fruits (control) packed in nylon net
bags. Post harvest treatment with 6 % waxol + 1 % Ca[NO3]2 followed by 6 % waxol + 400 ppm CCC
recorded lower PLW and moisture loss throughout the storage period. The treatment with 6 % waxol
+0.1 % carbendazim was found effective in reducing decay loss. Treatment with 6 % waxol + 100 ppm
GA3 resulted in maximum retention of ascorbic acid followed by treatment 6 % waxol + 400 ppm CCC.
Packaging of fruits in perforated PE bags had remarkable effect in reducing PLW, retention in moisture
and acceptable physico-chemical qualities. The shelf life of aonla fruits was extended upto 15 days at
room temperature when fruits were treated with 6 % waxol + 400 ppm CCC and packed in perforated
PE bags. This treatment combination recorded the maximum score for marketability.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. A.O.A.C.(1975) Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Agricultural Chemists. 12th ed. Washington, D.C. 2004.
    2. Amerine, M.A. et. al. (1965). Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food. Academic Press, London. pp. 315.
    3. Bain, J.M. and Mercer, F.V. (1963). Aust. J. biol. Sci. 16 : 442-449.
    4. Bhaskar, M.K.(1994). Thesis, M.P.K.V., Rahuri, India.
    5. Dalal, V.B. and Subramanyam, H.(1970). Climate Control. 3 : 37.
    6. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A.(1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research, 2nd Ed. International Rice
    7. Research Institute Book. Willey Intersciences Pub., New York. pp. 306-308.
    8. Gupta, V.K. and Mukherjee, D.(1982). Scientia Hortic., 16 : 155-162.
    9. Jones, R. et.al. (1970). Bot. Rev. 36 : 407-423.
    10. Kumar, J., et.al. (1987). Res. Dev. Report. 4(1) : 21-25.
    11. Kumar, S. and Nath V. (1993). J. Food Sci. Technol. 30(3) : 202-203.
    12. Nagaraju, C.(1991). Mysore J. agric. Sci. 26 : 394.
    13. Nath, V. et.al. (1992). Prog. Horti. 24 (1-2) : 79-82.
    14. Patel, A.B. and Sachan, S.C.P. (1995). Indian Fd. Packer. 49(4) : 43-46.
    15. Upadhyay, M.N. and Dixit, C.K. (1996). J. Applied Hort., Navsari., 2 (1-2) : 44-45.
    16. Yadhav, V.K. and Singh, H.K.(1999). J. of Applied Hort., Lucknow, 1 (2): 118-121.
    Published In
    Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 42 issue 3 (september 2008) : 189 -194

      SHELF LIFE OF AONLA FRUITS: INFLUENCED BY POST HARVEST TREATMENTS AND PACKAGING MATERIALS

      S
      S. S. Dhumal
      A
      A.R. Karale
      V
      V. K. Garande
      B
      B. T. Patil
      S
      S. D. Masalkar
      D
      D.B. Kshirsagar
      1Department of Horticulture, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri-413 722, India.

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Dhumal S. S., Karale A.R., Garande K. V., Patil T. B., Masalkar D. S., Kshirsagar D.B. (2025). SHELF LIFE OF AONLA FRUITS: INFLUENCED BY POST HARVEST TREATMENTS AND PACKAGING MATERIALS. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 42(3): 189 -194. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      The effect of wax emulsion alone and in combination with post harvest chemicals and different
      packagings on physico-chemical characters and marketability of aonla under ambient storage conditions
      was studied. The physico-chemical changes were faster in untreated fruits (control) packed in nylon net
      bags. Post harvest treatment with 6 % waxol + 1 % Ca[NO3]2 followed by 6 % waxol + 400 ppm CCC
      recorded lower PLW and moisture loss throughout the storage period. The treatment with 6 % waxol
      +0.1 % carbendazim was found effective in reducing decay loss. Treatment with 6 % waxol + 100 ppm
      GA3 resulted in maximum retention of ascorbic acid followed by treatment 6 % waxol + 400 ppm CCC.
      Packaging of fruits in perforated PE bags had remarkable effect in reducing PLW, retention in moisture
      and acceptable physico-chemical qualities. The shelf life of aonla fruits was extended upto 15 days at
      room temperature when fruits were treated with 6 % waxol + 400 ppm CCC and packed in perforated
      PE bags. This treatment combination recorded the maximum score for marketability.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. A.O.A.C.(1975) Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Agricultural Chemists. 12th ed. Washington, D.C. 2004.
        2. Amerine, M.A. et. al. (1965). Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food. Academic Press, London. pp. 315.
        3. Bain, J.M. and Mercer, F.V. (1963). Aust. J. biol. Sci. 16 : 442-449.
        4. Bhaskar, M.K.(1994). Thesis, M.P.K.V., Rahuri, India.
        5. Dalal, V.B. and Subramanyam, H.(1970). Climate Control. 3 : 37.
        6. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A.(1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research, 2nd Ed. International Rice
        7. Research Institute Book. Willey Intersciences Pub., New York. pp. 306-308.
        8. Gupta, V.K. and Mukherjee, D.(1982). Scientia Hortic., 16 : 155-162.
        9. Jones, R. et.al. (1970). Bot. Rev. 36 : 407-423.
        10. Kumar, J., et.al. (1987). Res. Dev. Report. 4(1) : 21-25.
        11. Kumar, S. and Nath V. (1993). J. Food Sci. Technol. 30(3) : 202-203.
        12. Nagaraju, C.(1991). Mysore J. agric. Sci. 26 : 394.
        13. Nath, V. et.al. (1992). Prog. Horti. 24 (1-2) : 79-82.
        14. Patel, A.B. and Sachan, S.C.P. (1995). Indian Fd. Packer. 49(4) : 43-46.
        15. Upadhyay, M.N. and Dixit, C.K. (1996). J. Applied Hort., Navsari., 2 (1-2) : 44-45.
        16. Yadhav, V.K. and Singh, H.K.(1999). J. of Applied Hort., Lucknow, 1 (2): 118-121.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)