Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 43 issue 2 (june 2009) : 144-147

INFLUENCE OF ANTITRANSPIRANTS ON PHOTOSYNTHESIS, LEAF DRY WT., NITRATE REDUCTASE ACTIVITY AND LEAF YIELD OF MULBERRY (MORUS ALBA L.) UNDER WATER STRESS CONDITION

A
A.K. Misra
B
B.K. Das
J
J.K. Datta!
G
G.C. De2
1Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Berhampore-742 101, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Misra A.K., Das B.K., Datta! J.K., De2 G.C. (2025). INFLUENCE OF ANTITRANSPIRANTS ON PHOTOSYNTHESIS, LEAF DRY WT., NITRATE REDUCTASE ACTIVITY AND LEAF YIELD OF MULBERRY (MORUS ALBA L.) UNDER WATER STRESS CONDITION. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 43(2): 144-147. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Different concentrations of four antitranspirants were applied on the foliage of
mulberry (MOTUS alba L.) var. S-1 during the year 1999-2001 with a view to study the
physiological activity and leaf yield under water stresS condition. CCC increased. the
photosynthetic rate of mulberry at 54 %than that of control in limited irrigated condition.
PMA was less effective as compared to CCC, BX-112 and ABA. Accumulation of dry
matter of mulberry leaves was observed higher due to CCC application followed by BX112.
The nitrate reductase activity was found maximum in CCC treated plants in two
levels of irrigation. The leaf yield was also found maximum in CCC treated mulberry
leaves followed by BX-112 . The correlation between Photosynthesis and leaf yield,
nitrate reductase and leaf yieW and nitrate reductase and photosynthesis were found
significant.

REFERENCES

  1. Aggarwal,P.K and1oundal, KR. (198) Plant PhysioJ. and Biochem. 15(1):161-168.
  2. Bashist, D.P. (1990) Acta Bot. Indica. 18:55-58.
  3. Jaworski, E.G. (1971). Biochem. Biophys. Res.--Commun. 43:1274-1279.
  4. Kramer, P.J. (1963). Agron J. 55:31-.55.
  5. Pandey, A.K and Yadav, R.S. (1999) Plant-PhysioJ. 57:941-943.
  6. ~liwal, K and Ilangmzan, M. (1996") Sericologia. 30(3):369-379.
  7. PatH, B.B. and De, R. (1976) Plant PhysioJ. 57:941-943.
  8. Reddy, S.P.D993). Indian J. Seric. 32(1):119-120.
  9. Sairam, R.K et al. (1989) Indian J. Plant Physidl. 32(1):51-56.
  10. Sairam, R.K. et aJ. (1991) Indian J. Plant Physiol. 34:222-227.
  11. Santakuamri et aJ. (1977) Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. B. 86:143-150.
  12. Tezuka, T. etal. (1980) PlantCelJ PhysioJ. 21:969-977.
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 43 issue 2 (june 2009) : 144-147

    INFLUENCE OF ANTITRANSPIRANTS ON PHOTOSYNTHESIS, LEAF DRY WT., NITRATE REDUCTASE ACTIVITY AND LEAF YIELD OF MULBERRY (MORUS ALBA L.) UNDER WATER STRESS CONDITION

    A
    A.K. Misra
    B
    B.K. Das
    J
    J.K. Datta!
    G
    G.C. De2
    1Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Berhampore-742 101, India

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Misra A.K., Das B.K., Datta! J.K., De2 G.C. (2025). INFLUENCE OF ANTITRANSPIRANTS ON PHOTOSYNTHESIS, LEAF DRY WT., NITRATE REDUCTASE ACTIVITY AND LEAF YIELD OF MULBERRY (MORUS ALBA L.) UNDER WATER STRESS CONDITION. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 43(2): 144-147. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    Different concentrations of four antitranspirants were applied on the foliage of
    mulberry (MOTUS alba L.) var. S-1 during the year 1999-2001 with a view to study the
    physiological activity and leaf yield under water stresS condition. CCC increased. the
    photosynthetic rate of mulberry at 54 %than that of control in limited irrigated condition.
    PMA was less effective as compared to CCC, BX-112 and ABA. Accumulation of dry
    matter of mulberry leaves was observed higher due to CCC application followed by BX112.
    The nitrate reductase activity was found maximum in CCC treated plants in two
    levels of irrigation. The leaf yield was also found maximum in CCC treated mulberry
    leaves followed by BX-112 . The correlation between Photosynthesis and leaf yield,
    nitrate reductase and leaf yieW and nitrate reductase and photosynthesis were found
    significant.

    REFERENCES

    1. Aggarwal,P.K and1oundal, KR. (198) Plant PhysioJ. and Biochem. 15(1):161-168.
    2. Bashist, D.P. (1990) Acta Bot. Indica. 18:55-58.
    3. Jaworski, E.G. (1971). Biochem. Biophys. Res.--Commun. 43:1274-1279.
    4. Kramer, P.J. (1963). Agron J. 55:31-.55.
    5. Pandey, A.K and Yadav, R.S. (1999) Plant-PhysioJ. 57:941-943.
    6. ~liwal, K and Ilangmzan, M. (1996") Sericologia. 30(3):369-379.
    7. PatH, B.B. and De, R. (1976) Plant PhysioJ. 57:941-943.
    8. Reddy, S.P.D993). Indian J. Seric. 32(1):119-120.
    9. Sairam, R.K et al. (1989) Indian J. Plant Physidl. 32(1):51-56.
    10. Sairam, R.K. et aJ. (1991) Indian J. Plant Physiol. 34:222-227.
    11. Santakuamri et aJ. (1977) Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. B. 86:143-150.
    12. Tezuka, T. etal. (1980) PlantCelJ PhysioJ. 21:969-977.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)