Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 43 issue 2 (june 2009) : 139-143

ETHANOL RECOVERY AND BIOCHEMICAL STUDIES OF SOME ELITE SWEET SORGHUM CULTIVARS

S
Sanjay Bhoyar
R
Ritu Thakare
1Agro Product Development Research Centre, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola-444 104, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Bhoyar Sanjay, Thakare Ritu (2025). ETHANOL RECOVERY AND BIOCHEMICAL STUDIES OF SOME ELITE SWEET SORGHUM CULTIVARS. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 43(2): 139-143. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The experiment was conducted with ten cultivars of sweet sorghum to know the
ethanol recovery and biochemical composition from stalk juice and grain. At physiological
maturity, maximum recovery of ethanol(9.12%) was obtained from the stalk juice of
NSS-208, which was found to be highest in total sugar (17.40%) and lowest in reducing
sugar (1.46%). The AKSSV-24 cultivar was also showed higher ethanol.recovery (9.03%).
The significantly superior grain starch content were reported by NSS-104 (72.5%) and
Keller (71.6 %) which ultimately turned to maximum yield of grain ethanol Le. 44.96 and
44.57 %respectively. Further biochemical analysis of grain revealed that maximum amylose
and amylopectin were found· in NSS-I04 followed by Keller, as well as NSS-104
found significantly superior in fat content (4.3%). Maximum content of phenol was
observed in BJ-248 (0.7%). Amongst all, grain malt of BJ-248 recorded highest diastatic
power (45.82. DUg-1) followed by NSS-04 (41.65 DUg-1). The analysis of bagasse
remained after extraction of juice reported that cellulose and lignin content was
maximum in bagasse of NSS-104 where as highest percentage of hemicellulose
was obtained in bagasse of Wray.

REFERENCES

  1. Anonymous, (1984). Official Methods ofAnalysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 14'1.
  2. Ed., Inc. 1111 North Nineteenth street, Suite-210, Arlington, 22209,USA.
  3. Daiber, K. H., (1971). Grain and malting quality of sorghum cultivar II. In Scientia, Chem 180. PretoriaSouth Africa, National Chemical Research Lab. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research.
  4. Dubois, M., et al. (1956). Anal. Chem. 28:350-356.
  5. Goss, G., (1996). In: First European Seminar on Sorghum for Energy and Industry. Toulouse,France 1-3 April. pp-2. ,
  6. I-Ioseney, R.c., et al. (1981). In Advances in Cereal Science and Technology. IV (Pomeranz Y. ed.) American, Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota.
  7. Mamma, D., et al. (1996). Process Biochem. 31(4):377-381.
  8. Miller, G., (1959). Anal. Chem. 31(3):426-428.
  9. Miller,a.H. and Burns, R.E. (1970). J. Food Sci. 35:666-668.
  10. Seetharama, N., et al. (2002). Seminar on "Current Developments in Alcohol Industry" conducted by theDistillers Association of Maharashtra, 25th August 2002 at Mumbai.
  11. TAPPI standard, (1978) Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry. Atlanta, Georgia, 30:338.
  12. Thakare, Ritu, et al. (2002). Anna. Pl. PhysioI16(1):1-3.
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 43 issue 2 (june 2009) : 139-143

    ETHANOL RECOVERY AND BIOCHEMICAL STUDIES OF SOME ELITE SWEET SORGHUM CULTIVARS

    S
    Sanjay Bhoyar
    R
    Ritu Thakare
    1Agro Product Development Research Centre, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola-444 104, India

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Bhoyar Sanjay, Thakare Ritu (2025). ETHANOL RECOVERY AND BIOCHEMICAL STUDIES OF SOME ELITE SWEET SORGHUM CULTIVARS. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 43(2): 139-143. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    The experiment was conducted with ten cultivars of sweet sorghum to know the
    ethanol recovery and biochemical composition from stalk juice and grain. At physiological
    maturity, maximum recovery of ethanol(9.12%) was obtained from the stalk juice of
    NSS-208, which was found to be highest in total sugar (17.40%) and lowest in reducing
    sugar (1.46%). The AKSSV-24 cultivar was also showed higher ethanol.recovery (9.03%).
    The significantly superior grain starch content were reported by NSS-104 (72.5%) and
    Keller (71.6 %) which ultimately turned to maximum yield of grain ethanol Le. 44.96 and
    44.57 %respectively. Further biochemical analysis of grain revealed that maximum amylose
    and amylopectin were found· in NSS-I04 followed by Keller, as well as NSS-104
    found significantly superior in fat content (4.3%). Maximum content of phenol was
    observed in BJ-248 (0.7%). Amongst all, grain malt of BJ-248 recorded highest diastatic
    power (45.82. DUg-1) followed by NSS-04 (41.65 DUg-1). The analysis of bagasse
    remained after extraction of juice reported that cellulose and lignin content was
    maximum in bagasse of NSS-104 where as highest percentage of hemicellulose
    was obtained in bagasse of Wray.

    REFERENCES

    1. Anonymous, (1984). Official Methods ofAnalysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 14'1.
    2. Ed., Inc. 1111 North Nineteenth street, Suite-210, Arlington, 22209,USA.
    3. Daiber, K. H., (1971). Grain and malting quality of sorghum cultivar II. In Scientia, Chem 180. PretoriaSouth Africa, National Chemical Research Lab. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research.
    4. Dubois, M., et al. (1956). Anal. Chem. 28:350-356.
    5. Goss, G., (1996). In: First European Seminar on Sorghum for Energy and Industry. Toulouse,France 1-3 April. pp-2. ,
    6. I-Ioseney, R.c., et al. (1981). In Advances in Cereal Science and Technology. IV (Pomeranz Y. ed.) American, Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota.
    7. Mamma, D., et al. (1996). Process Biochem. 31(4):377-381.
    8. Miller, G., (1959). Anal. Chem. 31(3):426-428.
    9. Miller,a.H. and Burns, R.E. (1970). J. Food Sci. 35:666-668.
    10. Seetharama, N., et al. (2002). Seminar on "Current Developments in Alcohol Industry" conducted by theDistillers Association of Maharashtra, 25th August 2002 at Mumbai.
    11. TAPPI standard, (1978) Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry. Atlanta, Georgia, 30:338.
    12. Thakare, Ritu, et al. (2002). Anna. Pl. PhysioI16(1):1-3.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)