Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 46 issue 2 (june 2012) : 127 - 133

INVESTIGATION OF INDOLE ACETIC ACID PRODUCTION POTENTIAL OF Azotobacter chroococcum USING WHEAT COLEOPTILE BIOASSAY

*Renuka Madhu, Mustafiz Ahemud, P. Ravichand, A.M. Rahman
1Reva Institute of Science and Management, Department of Biotechnology, Yelahanka, Bangalore-560 064, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Madhu *Renuka, Ahemud Mustafiz, Ravichand P., Rahman A.M. (2024). INVESTIGATION OF INDOLE ACETIC ACID PRODUCTION POTENTIAL OF Azotobacter chroococcum USING WHEAT COLEOPTILE BIOASSAY. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 46(2): 127 - 133. doi: .
Azotobacter chroococcum was isolated from the garden soil in Jensen’s media. Morphological characterization and biochemical tests were done for confirmation. Using Indole Acetic Acid as the standard, auxin production potential of Azotobacter chroococcum was analysed using bioassay method involving wheat (Triticum durum var dara) coleoptile elongation in the culture filtrate. A positive moderate correlation of 0.44 was obtained between the coleoptile length and Indole Acetic Acid standard solutions. The highest amount of Auxin production by Azotobacter chroococcum was observed after 48 hrs of incubation, the effect exerted by the diluted culture filtrate being close to the effect of nearly optimal concentration of 10-4 to 10-5 mol/litre. In conclusion, Azotobacter chroococcum appears to be an ideal soil microorganism for high level of Indole Acetic Acid production. The details of the experiment can be utilized for the scaling up of Indole Acetic Acid production which can be commercially utilized for plant growth.
  1. Aneja K.R, (2003) Experiments in Microbiology, Plant Pathology and Biotechnology, New Age International Limited:264-265.
  2. Bertrand, H., Nalin, R., Bally, R. and Marel, J. C. C, (2001) Isolation and identification of the most efficient plant growth promoting bacteria associated with canola. Biology and Fertility of Soil. 33: 152-156.
  3. Brown E., Jackson R.M and K. Burlinghams, (1968) Effects produced on tomato plants, Lycopersicon esculentum, by seed and root treatment with gibberellic acid and indole acetic acid, J.Exp.Bot 19 :66.
  4. Burlinghams.K , (1964) Growth regulators produced by Azotobacter in culture media, Ann.Rep. Rothamsted Exp.Stat,:92.
  5. Deb Roy, B and G.D. Sharma, (2010) Evaluation of carrier based inoculants of Azotobacter chroococcum strain SDSA -I12/2 in improving the yield of summer (ahu) rice cv.IR-36 , Biofrontiers 1: 36-40.
  6. Jackson R.M and E. Brown, (1966) Behaviour of Azotobacter chroococcum introduced into the plant rhizosphere, Annls.Inst.Pasteur, 3:103.
  7. Johri, B, N .Jyothi, K.Sharma, (1995) Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria: Interaction and interplay with seedling diseases of tree legumes, Management of diseases of economic importance in tropical plantation,1:06-15.
  8. Khye Seng Goh and Nalin Rastogi, (2010) Simple and rapid method for detection of nitrate reductase activity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium canettii grown in the Bactec MGIT960 system, J.Microbiological.Methods, 81:208-210.
  9. Loper, J.E., M.N. Schroth,(1986) Influence of bacterial sources of indole-3 –acetic acid on root elongation of sugar beet, Phytopathology, 76:386-389.
  10. Rangaswamy R, (2002) A Text Book of Agricultural Statistics, New age International Limited, publishers:143-146.
  11. Rao, D. L. N. (1975) Azotobacter inoculants. In: Rao, N. S. S. (ed.), Soil Microorganisms and Plant Growth. Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, New Delhi, India.
  12. Roviraa, D, (1965) Effects of Azotobacter, Bacillus and Clostridium on the growth of wheat, Plant Microbe Relationships. Symposium on Relationships between Soil Microorganisms and Plant Roots:193.
  13. Sebdner,G, G. Schneider, K.Schreiber, (1988) Methods for Plant Hormone Analysis:35.
  14. Sergeeva, E, A.Liaimer and B.Bergman, (2002) Evidence for production of the phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid by Cyanobacteria, Planta,215:229-232.
  15. Vancurav, & Macuraj,(1960) Detection of gibberellic acid in Azotobacter cultures, Nature, 192:88.
  16. Weiler, E.W, P.S.Jourdan & W. Conrad, (1981) Levels of indole-3-acetic acid in intact and decapitated coleoptiles as determined by specific and highly sensitive solid-phase enzyme immunoassay, Planta ,153: 561-571.
  17. Zambre, M.A, B.K.Konde and K.R.Sonar (1984), Effect of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum brasilense inoculation under graded levels of nitrogen on growth and yield of wheat, Plant and Soil,79: 61-67.

Editorial Board

View all (0)