Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 44 issue 4 (december 2010) : 259 - 266

ROLE OF CELL WALL COMPONENTS IN SINK SIZE DEVELOPMENT IN SEEDS OF CAJANUS CAJAN (L.) MILLSP.

Rita S. Chudasama, Vrinda S. Thaker*
1Department of Biosciences, Saurashtra University, Rajkot 360 005, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Chudasama S. Rita, Thaker* S. Vrinda (2024). ROLE OF CELL WALL COMPONENTS IN SINK SIZE DEVELOPMENT IN SEEDS OF CAJANUS CAJAN (L.) MILLSP.. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 44(4): 259 - 266. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Esterified and non esterified pectins along with low and high molecular weight xyloglucans were
estimated from the developing seeds of Cajanus cajan. Two varieties; black seeded variety (V1, big
seeded) and B.D.N2 (V2, small seeded) variety in growth parameters were selected for the study. As
seeds of both the varieties showed distinct difference in their growth phases, a remarkable difference
was also observed in cell wall components during their developmental period. Esterified and non
esterified pectins remained higher in V1 seed throughout the development. At cell division phase
both kind of pectic substances were detected while low and high molecular weight xyloglucans
remained in negligible amount. During cell elongation phase a remarkable difference in pectins and
xyloglucans was observed. Dry weight and water content showed a significant correlation with both
pectic substances and xyloglucans. The probable role of wall components in sink size development is
discussed.

REFERENCES

  1. Augur, C. et al. (1992) Plant Physiol., 99: 180-185.
  2. Buckeridge, M.S. et al. (1992) Physiol. Plant., 86: 145-151.
  3. Carpita, N.C. and Gibeaut, D.M. (1993) Plant J., 3: 1-30.
  4. Cosgrove, D.J. (2000) Nature, 407: 321-326.
  5. Daveby, Y.D. and Aman, P. (1993) Swedish J. Agric. Res., 23: 133-139.
  6. Dubois, M. et al. (1956) Annal. Chem., 28: 350-356.
  7. Egli, D.B. (1990) J. Exp. Bot., 41: 243-248.
  8. Evans, L.T. and Dunstone, R.L. (1970) Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 23: 725-741.
  9. Fujino, T. and Itoh, T. (1998) Plant Cell Physiol., 39: 1315-1323.
  10. Hanson, W.D. (1991) Crop Sci., 31: 1600-1604.
  11. Kobata, T. et al. (1992) Crop Sci., 32: 1238-1242.
  12. Kooiman, P. (1960) Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays. Bas., 79: 675-678.
  13. Maclachan, G. and Brady, C. (1994) Plant Physiol., 105: 965-974.
  14. McCann, M.C. et al. (1990) J. Cell Sci., 96: 323-334.
  15. McCarty, D.R. (1995) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 46: 71-93.
  16. Nishitani, K. and Masuda, Y. (1981). Physiol. Plant., 52: 480-494.
  17. Nishitani, K. and Tominaga, R. (1992) J. Biol. Chem., 267: 21058-21064.
  18. Patel, D. and Thaker, V. S. (2004) Acta Physiol. Planta., 26(3): 239-246.
  19. Rabadia, V.S. et al. (1999) J. Agron. Crop. Sci., 183: 255-261.
  20. Reis, D. et al. (1987) Planta, 170: 60-73.
  21. Sakurai, N. (1991) Bot. Mag. Tokyo., 104: 235-251.
  22. Santos, H.P. et al. (2004) Plant Physiol., 135: 287-299.
  23. Selvendran, R.R. et al. (1985) Soc. Exp. Biol. Semin. Ser., 28: 39-78.
  24. Silvatine, M.A. et al. (2000) Revta. Brasil. Bot. Sao. Paulo., 23: 415-419.
  25. Stolle-Smits, T. et al. (1999) Plant Physiol., 121: 363-372.
  26. Stombaugh, S.K. et al. (2000) Crop Sci., 40: 408-412.
  27. Takeda, T. et al. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99: 9055-9060.
  28. Tanaka, A. and Yamaguchi, J. (1972) J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido. Univ., 57: 71-132.
  29. Terry, M.E. et al. (1981) Plant Physiol., 68: 531-537.
  30. Thaker, V.S. (1998) Acta Physiol. Plant., 20: 179-182.
  31. Thaker, V.S. (1999) Acta. Physiol. Plant., 21: 155-159.
  32. Thompson, J.E. and Fry, S.C. (2001) The Plant J., 26: 23-34.
  33. Tine, M.A.S. et al. (2000) Plant Sci., 154: 117-126.
  34. Weber, H. et al. (2005) Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 56: 253-279.
  35. Wood, D.W. et al. (1977) Seed Sci. Technol., 5: 337-352.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)