Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research

HETEROSIS AND COMBINING ABILITY ANALYSIS FOR SEED YIELD AND ITS ATTRIBUTES IN INDIAN MUSTARD [BRASSICA JUNCEA (L.) CZERN & COSS.]

Article Id: ARCC081 | Page : 535-539
Citation :- HETEROSIS AND COMBINING ABILITY ANALYSIS FOR SEED YIELD AND ITS ATTRIBUTES IN INDIAN MUSTARD [BRASSICA JUNCEA (L.) CZERN & COSS.].Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research.2013.(47):535-539
R.A. Gami* and R.M. Chauhan1 ramangami@gmail.com
Address : Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, C.P. College of Agriculture, S.D. Agriculture University, Sardarkrushinagar-385 506 India

Abstract

Combining ability, gene action and heterosis was studied in a set of six parental lines, four tester and their hybrids of Indian mustard following a L x T mating design. The parents PUSA BOLD and BIO-902 exhibited significant and positive GCA effects for seed yield per plant while parental genotype PCR-7 was good general combiner for 1000-seed weight. The ratio of  ó2gca / ó2sca being less than unity for all yield attributing traits indicated predominance of non-additive gene action for all the traits. The hybrids SKM-9820 X GM-2 and PCR-7 X VARUNA revealed highest SCA effects and Heterosis over batter parent and standard parent. Considering mean performance, heterosis and combining ability effects, the parents GM 2, SKM-9033, PUSA BOLD, SKM-9820 and hybrids SKM-9820 x GM 2, PCR-7 x VARUNA and SKM-9033 x VARUNA were found to be promising for exploitation of heterosis and to undertaken crossing program to obtain desirable segregants.

Keywords

Combining ability GCA Gene action Heterosis Line x Tester (LxT) SCA.

References

  1. Allard,R.W.(1960). Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons. New York.
  2. Bhatt, A. B. (2007). Genetic studies of quantitative and qualitative traits in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss]. M. Sc. Thesis (Unpublished), submitted to Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar.
  3. Briggle, L.W. (1963). Heterosis in wheat : A Review. Crop Sci., 3 : 407-412.
  4. Fonseca, S. and Patterson, F. (1968). Hybrid vigour in a seven parent diallel crosses in common winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop Sci., 8 : 85-88.
  5. Hanson, J.B., Hageman, R.H. and Fisher, M.E. (1960). The association of carbohydrates with mitochondria of corn scutellum. Agron. J., 52 : 49-32.
  6. Kempthorne, O. (1957). An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. John Willey and Sons Inc., New York.
  7. Labana KS, Banga SK (1984). Floral Biology in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Coss]. Genet Agr., 38:131 138
  8. Makwana, S. K. and Patel, A. D. (2010). Combining ability and heterosis in mustard. International J. of Plant Sci., 6 : 32-40.
  9. Meredith, W.R. and Bridge, R.R. (1972). Heterosis and gene action in cotton Gossypium hirsutum., Crop Sci., 12:304-310
  10. Nassimi, A. W., Razziudin, Sardar, A. and Ali, N. (2006). Study on heterosis of agronomic characters of rapessed [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss]using diallel. Agron. J., 5(3):505-508.
  11. Pandey, L.D., Singh, B. and Sachan, J.N.(1999) Brassica hybrid research in India: Status and Prospect. Paper 263. In Proc. 10th Int. Rapseed Confr. Caneberra, Australia, pp:26-29.
  12. Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V. (1978). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. I. C. A. R. Publications, New Delhi.
  13. Patel, C.G., Parmar, M.B., Patel, K.R. and Patel, K.M. (2010). Exploitation of heterosis breeding in Indian mustard. J. Oilseeds Res., 27 (1):47-48.
  14. Rao, M. P. and Gulati, S. D. (2008). Heterosis and combining ability analysis in mustard. Crop Res. 22 (2) : 79-82.
  15. Sagwal, T.C. and Rana, S. K. (2010). Heterosis and combining ability in rapeseed [Brassica napus (L.)]. Int. J. Agril. Sci., 15 (2) : 163-167.
  16. Shrivastava, K. and Rai B. (1993). Expression of heterosis for seed yield and its attributes in rapeseed. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 63 (4) : 243-245.
  17. Sing, M.L., Swarnkar, G.B., Prasad, L and Dixit R.K. (2003). Heterobeltiosis and Inbreeding depression in Indian mustard (B.juncea L. Czern and Coss.). Crop.Res.26 (2):318-325.
  18. Sing,D. (2003). Genetic improvement in Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A.Braun) vis a vis Indian mustard (B.juncea L. Czern and Coss.), In Proc.11th Int Rapseed Confr. Copenhegen, Denmark. 4-7 July 2003, p:513.
  19. Singh, S. P. and Ranjeet (2010). Genetics of yield components and oil content in Indian mustard. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 5 (1) : 60-66.
  20. Sohan Ram (2009). Heterosis for seed yield and yield components in Indian mustard, (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss). J. Oilseeds Res., (Special Issue) 26:3-5.
  21. Solanki, S. D.; Joshi, V. C.; Haibatpure, S. H. and Pathak, H. C. (2009). Combining ability studies in mustard, Brassica juncea (L.) over environments. J. Oilseeds Res., (Special Issue) 26: 593-596.
  22. Wos,H., Bartkowiak-Broda,I. Budizianowski,G. and Krzymanski J.(1999). Breeding of winter and spring oilseed rape hybrid at malyszyn. Paper 544. In Proc. 10th Int. Rapseed Confr. Caneberra, Australia, pp:26-29.

Global Footprints