Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 47 issue 5 (october 2013) : 461-464

MARKETING OF RED GRAM IN GULBARGA DISTRICT OF INDIA

V.G. Shashikant, Laxmi Rani Dubey*1, Dinesh Kumar2
1Department of Agricultural Economics, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar- 263 145, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Shashikant V.G., Dubey*1 Rani Laxmi, Kumar2 Dinesh (2024). MARKETING OF RED GRAM IN GULBARGA DISTRICT OF INDIA. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 47(5): 461-464. doi: .
The study was conducted in Gulbarga district of Karnataka as it contributed 60.92 per cent share in total production of red gram at state level. Study was undertaken to explore out the different marketing aspects of red gram. Primary data were collected from selected sample respondents (36 small, 15 medium and 9 large) and market intermediaries. The marketing costs, market margins i.e. absolute margin, price spread and producer’s share in consumer’s rupee were calculated across the observed marketing channels with simple statistical tools. The results indicated that the most popular marketing channel followed by all the three categories of farmers was producer-Agricultural Produce co-operative Marketing Committee (APMC) as more than 77 per cent of the farmers had sold their produce through this channel. It was found that per quintal marketing cost was highest on large farms (Rs.79) followed by small (Rs.76) and medium farms (Rs.73). However, the prices received by all the three categories of farmers varied according to the marketing channels. The highest price received by producers out of consumer’s rupee was observed in case of the channel-I, where the producers directly sold their produce in APMC.
  1. Balaji P.P. and Sivakumar N.R. (2001). Marketing channels of ground nut grown in Tiruvanamalai district of Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing 15(2):55-59.
  2. Oppen M.V. and Von O.M. (1981). Marketing of pigeonpea in India. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Pigeonpea. Vol (1): 332-343. 15-19 December 1980. Patancheru.
  3. Shelke R.D., Nagure D.V. and Patil, S.N. (2009). Price spread and marketing pattern of groundnut in Maharashtra state. Agriculture Update 4 (3/4): 376-378. 
  4. Singh G.N., Verma A.N. and Singh S.S.D. (1981). Economics of marketing and processing of arhar in district Unnao (U.P.). Agricultural Marketing 24 (1):9-12.
  5. Sudha P., Raju V.T. and Shareef S.M. (2005). Price spread and market margin of gingelly in Visakhapatnam district of Andhra Pradesh. Agricultural Marketing 18 (4):29-31.

Editorial Board

View all (0)