Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 47 issue 2 (april 2013) : 124-129

EFFECT OF GROWING MEDIA ON ITS PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES ON BEET ROOT YIELD UNDER PROTECTED CULTIVATION

A.R. Murumkar1, Barikara Umesha2*, D. Palanisamy, S. Santhana Bosu, C. Divaker Durairaj
1Agricultural Engineering College & Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 003, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Murumkar1 A.R., Umesha2* Barikara, Palanisamy D., Bosu Santhana S., Durairaj Divaker C. (2024). EFFECT OF GROWING MEDIA ON ITS PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES ON BEET ROOT YIELD UNDER PROTECTED CULTIVATION. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 47(2): 124-129. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted during 2008 to 2009 in naturally poly house. Selected chemical and physical characteristics of four types of growing medias comprising of coirpith, perlite, vermiculite and peat as separately and combination with vermicompost as 50% on volume basis ((v/v) were determined and their suitability as growing media was tested using beet root (nobol). Data on pH, EC, nutrient contents and various aspects of air-water relationships of the media, as well as yield of beet root were collected. The root yield per treatment was not significantly influenced by the treatments T1, T2, T3 and T4 but while root yield of beet root was found to be significantly influenced by treatments T5, T6, T7 and T8. Results indicated that certain chemical and physical properties of selected soilless media can be improved through incorporation of vermicompost and its positive effect was clearly reflected in the yield of beet root.

REFERENCES

  1. Abad, M., Noguera, P., Bures, S., (2001). National inventory of organic wastes for use as growing media for ornamental potted plant production: case study in Spain. Biores. Technol. 77:197-200.
  2. Atiyeh, R. M., Subler, S., Edwards, C. A. Bachman, G., Metzger, J. D. and Shuster, W., (2000)b. Effects of vermicomposts and composts on plant growth in gorticultural container media and soil. Pedobiologia 44:579-590.
  3. Conover, C. A. (1967). Soil mixes for ornamental plants. Florida Flower Grower, 4:1-4.
  4. De Boodt, M. and Verdonck O. (1972). The physical properties of the substrates in horticulture. Acta. Hort. 26:37-44.
  5. Francesco Montesano., Gianfranco favuzzi., Angelo parente and Francesco serio nad Pietro santamaria. (2005). NFT versus subirrigation : I. yield and water use efficiency of tomato grown in closed soilless systems under salinity or water stress. Hort. Sci., 40 :1011-1012.
  6. Ghehsareh, A.M., Borji Hassan and Jafarpour Mehrdad.(2011). Effect of some culture substrates (date-palm peat, cocopeat and perlite) on some growing indices and nutrient elements uptake in greenhouse tomato. Afri J. Microbio. Res. 5(12):1437-1442,
  7. Jensen, M. H. (1999): Hydroponics worldwide. Acta Hort. 481, 719–729.
  8. Jeremybishko., A. and R.Fisher Paul. (2003). The pH response of a peat- based medium to application of acid-reaction chemicals. Hort. Sci., 38(1):26-31.
  9. Klock, K.A., (1997). Growth of salt sensitive bedding plants in media amended with composted urban waste. Compost Sci. Utilization 5:55–59.
  10. Maynard, D. N. and Hochmuth G. J.. (1997). Knott’s Handbook for Vegetable Growers. 4th ed. Wiley, New York. P. 136:138-139.
  11. Miguel, A., Rosales, M. Luis, Cervilla, J. Juan, Ríos, Begona Blasco, Eva Sánchez-Rodríguez, Luis Romero and M. Juan Ruiz. (2009). Environmental conditions affect pectin solubilization in cherry tomato fruits grown in two experimental Mediterranean greenhouses. Environ. Exp. Bot. 67:320–327.
  12. Nighawan, S.D. and Kanwar, J.S. (1952). Physico-chemical properties of earth worms casting and their effect on the productivity of soil. Indian J. Agri.Sci. 22:357-372.
  13. Orozco, F. H., Cegarra, J., Trujillo, L.M. and Roig, A., (1996). Vermicomposting of coffee pulp using the earthworm Eisensia fetida: effects on C and N contents and the availability of nutrients. Biol. Fertil. Soils 22:162-166.
  14. Padem, H., Alan R. and Guvenc I. (1995): Farklý ortamlarýn hýyar (Cucumis sativus)’ da verim ve bazý özelliklere etkisi. Turkiye III. Ulusal Bahçe Bitkileri Kongresi. 3–6 Ekim Cilt 2:149–153.
  15. Walter Chavez, Adalberto Di Benedetto, Gabriela Civeira and Raúl Lavado. (2008). Alternative soilless media for growing Petunia hybrida and Impatiens wallerana : Physical behavior, effect of fertilization and nitrate losses. Bioresource Technology 99:8082–8087.
  16. Verdonck, O., Vleeschauwer D. and De Boodt, M.D. (1983). The physical properties of horticultural substrates. Acta Hortic., 150: 155-160.
  17. Yahya Awang, Shaharan Anieza Shazmi, Mohamad Rosli B. and selamate Ahmad. (2009). Physical properties of coconut coir pith determination. Ameri. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 4:63-71.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)