Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 47 issue 1 (february 2013) : 83-88

PLANT POPULATION, NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND YIELD OF COTTON (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM) HYBRIDS AS AFFECTED BY SPACING AND FERTILITY LEVELS UNDER RAINFED CONDITION

Uma Nath Shukla*, M.S. Khakare, V.M. Bhale, Smita Singh1
1Department of Agronomy Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola- 444 001, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Shukla* Nath Uma, Khakare M.S., Bhale V.M., Singh1 Smita (2024). PLANT POPULATION, NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND YIELD OF COTTON (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM) HYBRIDS AS AFFECTED BY SPACING AND FERTILITY LEVELS UNDER RAINFED CONDITION. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 47(1): 83-88. doi: .
The field experiment consisted of  two crops geometry (S1-90 X 60 cm and S2- 60 X 60 cm), three cotton hybrids (V1-MLCH-318, V2-VBCH-2231 and PKV Hy-2) and three levels of NPK (F1-37.5 : 18.75 : 18.75, F2-50 : 25 : 25 and F3-62.5 : 31.25 : 31.25  kg N:P2O5:K2O/ha). Closer crop geometry of 60 X 60 cm significantly produced more plants population (271.51 ‘00’/ha and 242.77 ‘00’/ha at initial and harvest, respectively), lint yield (345 kg/ha), seed cotton yield (910 kg/ha) and stalk yield (1058 kg/ha) with uptake of N (40.39), P (14.78) and K (46.59 kg/ha) over wider crop geometry of 90 x 60 cm (S1). Among hybrids, MLCH-318 (V1) showed significantly superiority to VBCH-2231 (V2) and PKV Hy-2 (V3) in respect of lint yield (407 kg/ha), seed cotton yield (1034 kg/ha) and stalk yield (1054 kg/ha). MLCH-318 (V1)  when sown at crop geometry of 60 x 60 cm recorded the highest uptake of N (41.47 and 40.39), P (15.08 and 14.78) and K (48.01 and 46.59 kg/ha) with total uptake of NPK (104.56 and 101.76 kg/ha), respectively. The application of 62.5:31.25:31.25 N:P2O5:K2O/ha produced the  maximum lint yield (393 kg/ha), seed cotton yield (972 kg/ha), stalk yield (988 kg/ha) and recorded higher uptake of N (40.33), P (15.08), K (46.81 kg/ha) and total uptake of NPK (102.22 kg/ha). The interaction effect between hybrids and crop geometries was found significant.
  1. Anand, S.R. (2006). Response of Bt cotton hybrids (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to different plant spacings under irrigation. Karnataka J. Agric. Scie. 19:195.
  2. Anonymous. (2011). Annual Progress Report of Cotton. www.cci.com.
  3. Ashok, S., Madhukar, K., Dadabhur, Y., Vanda, P. And Mayuray, M. (2004). Cotton Scenario.
  4. Charjan, T.C. and Gaikwad, D.T. (2005). Efficiency of applied nitrogen on Varlaxmi hybrid cotton as influenced by different agro-technique. Indian J. Agron. 30:305-309.
  5. Katkar, R.N.; Turkhede, A.B.; Wankhade, S.T. and Solanke, V.M. (2000). Studies on agronomic requirement of promising cotton hybrids. Crop Rese. 19:525-526.
  6. Katore, J.R.; Wankhade, S.T.; Chavan, A.K.; Sajid, M. and Tiwari, V.A. (2006). Effect of spacing and fertilizer levels on soil moisture studies and economics in hirsutum cotton hybrids. Crop Prot. Prod. 1:26-27.
  7. Ravankar, H.N. and Lehria, G.S. (1994). Response of cotton varieties to levels of nitrogen under different plant population. PKV Res. J. 18:104-105.
  8. Solanke, V. M.; Turkhede, A.B.; Katkar, R.N.; Wankhade, S.T. and Sakhare, B.A. (2001). Response of cotton hybrids to various agronomic practices. Crop Res. 21:30-33.
  9. Tomar, R.S.S.; Kushwaha, A.L. and Pandey, S.C. 2002. Effect of row and intra row spacing on yield and quality of hybrid cotton (G. hirsutum) under rainfed condition. J. Cotton Res. and Develop. 16:24-26.
  10. Wankhade, S.T.; Kharche, S.G.; Deshpande, R.M. and Ghatol, D.M. (2001). Studies on cotton genotype under different sowing dates and spacing. New Approaches in Agric. Technol. 1:17-22.

Editorial Board

View all (0)