PLANT POPULATION, NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND YIELD OF COTTON (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM) HYBRIDS AS AFFECTED BY SPACING AND FERTILITY LEVELS UNDER RAINFED CONDITION

Article Id: ARCC011 | Page : 83-88
Citation :- PLANT POPULATION, NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND YIELD OF COTTON (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM) HYBRIDS AS AFFECTED BY SPACING AND FERTILITY LEVELS UNDER RAINFED CONDITION.Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research.2013.(47):83-88
Uma Nath Shukla*, M.S. Khakare, V.M. Bhale and Smita Singh1 umanaths7@gmail.com
Address : Department of Agronomy Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola- 444 001, India

Abstract

The field experiment consisted of  two crops geometry (S1-90 X 60 cm and S2- 60 X 60 cm), three cotton hybrids (V1-MLCH-318, V2-VBCH-2231 and PKV Hy-2) and three levels of NPK (F1-37.5 : 18.75 : 18.75, F2-50 : 25 : 25 and F3-62.5 : 31.25 : 31.25  kg N:P2O5:K2O/ha). Closer crop geometry of 60 X 60 cm significantly produced more plants population (271.51 ‘00’/ha and 242.77 ‘00’/ha at initial and harvest, respectively), lint yield (345 kg/ha), seed cotton yield (910 kg/ha) and stalk yield (1058 kg/ha) with uptake of N (40.39), P (14.78) and K (46.59 kg/ha) over wider crop geometry of 90 x 60 cm (S1). Among hybrids, MLCH-318 (V1) showed significantly superiority to VBCH-2231 (V2) and PKV Hy-2 (V3) in respect of lint yield (407 kg/ha), seed cotton yield (1034 kg/ha) and stalk yield (1054 kg/ha). MLCH-318 (V1)  when sown at crop geometry of 60 x 60 cm recorded the highest uptake of N (41.47 and 40.39), P (15.08 and 14.78) and K (48.01 and 46.59 kg/ha) with total uptake of NPK (104.56 and 101.76 kg/ha), respectively. The application of 62.5:31.25:31.25 N:P2O5:K2O/ha produced the  maximum lint yield (393 kg/ha), seed cotton yield (972 kg/ha), stalk yield (988 kg/ha) and recorded higher uptake of N (40.33), P (15.08), K (46.81 kg/ha) and total uptake of NPK (102.22 kg/ha). The interaction effect between hybrids and crop geometries was found significant.

Keywords

Fertility levels Hybrids Nutrient uptake Plant population Spacing.

References

  1. Anand, S.R. (2006). Response of Bt cotton hybrids (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to different plant spacings under irrigation. Karnataka J. Agric. Scie. 19:195.
  2. Anonymous. (2011). Annual Progress Report of Cotton. www.cci.com.
  3. Ashok, S., Madhukar, K., Dadabhur, Y., Vanda, P. And Mayuray, M. (2004). Cotton Scenario.
  4. Charjan, T.C. and Gaikwad, D.T. (2005). Efficiency of applied nitrogen on Varlaxmi hybrid cotton as influenced by different agro-technique. Indian J. Agron. 30:305-309.
  5. Katkar, R.N.; Turkhede, A.B.; Wankhade, S.T. and Solanke, V.M. (2000). Studies on agronomic requirement of promising cotton hybrids. Crop Rese. 19:525-526.
  6. Katore, J.R.; Wankhade, S.T.; Chavan, A.K.; Sajid, M. and Tiwari, V.A. (2006). Effect of spacing and fertilizer levels on soil moisture studies and economics in hirsutum cotton hybrids. Crop Prot. Prod. 1:26-27.
  7. Ravankar, H.N. and Lehria, G.S. (1994). Response of cotton varieties to levels of nitrogen under different plant population. PKV Res. J. 18:104-105.
  8. Solanke, V. M.; Turkhede, A.B.; Katkar, R.N.; Wankhade, S.T. and Sakhare, B.A. (2001). Response of cotton hybrids to various agronomic practices. Crop Res. 21:30-33.
  9. Tomar, R.S.S.; Kushwaha, A.L. and Pandey, S.C. 2002. Effect of row and intra row spacing on yield and quality of hybrid cotton (G. hirsutum) under rainfed condition. J. Cotton Res. and Develop. 16:24-26.
  10. Wankhade, S.T.; Kharche, S.G.; Deshpande, R.M. and Ghatol, D.M. (2001). Studies on cotton genotype under different sowing dates and spacing. New Approaches in Agric. Technol. 1:17-22.

Global Footprints