Material and equipment
Material
Leaves of
Schefflera heptaphylla were collected in Anh Son district, Nghe An province, Vietnam in July 2022 and identified by the Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Institute of Science and Technology. Leaves collected are processed within 24 hours. The material is cut to a size of 2 mm.
Equipment experimental and measurements
The drying process of
Schefflera heptaphylla leaves was carried out using a heat pump dryer model CYF-EL040 of Chin Ying Fa, Taiwan (Fig 1). The system used in this dryer consists of a heat pump system consisting of a compressor, two condensers (one located inside the drying chamber and the other outside the chamber, switched by a 3-way solenoid valve), one expansion valve, an evaporator, a heat recovery unit and an auxiliary heater in the form of resistance. The recycled refrigerant in the heat pump drying system is R22.
The temperatures and velocities of drying air were controlled to satisfy the setpoint of designed technology conditions. All process parameters were sampled and recorded. The drying air temperatures were controlled through the automatic coordination of the compressor, auxiliary heater and the 3-way solenoid valve. The velocities of drying air are regulated by an inverter to drive the axial fan at different values of rotational speed.
Methods
Proximate analysis
Proximate analysis of
Schefflera heptaphylla leaves in the whole experiment involved assessment of crude fiber, moisture content, total ash and total fat content.
Moisture content (MC)
For MC determination, a measured amount of sample was placed in a temperature-controlled oven at 105°C for 5-6 hours until a stable weight was reached
(Khan et al., 2013). Using an electronic balance, the dry weight of each sample is then measured. The MC percentage is determined using the following equation (1):
..........(1)
W
f: Final weight of a sample.
W
o: Original weight of sample.
Total fat estimation
Crude fat was estimated by cleaning dry ornaments with diethyl ether bleach. The detergent was removed using a rotary evaporator to dissolve it
(Khan et al., 2013). The crude fat content, expressed as a percentage, is calculated using the equation (2):
..........(2)
W
e: Weight of ether extract.
W
d: Weight of dried sample.
Determination of crude fiber
A 10 g moisture-free sample was heated at 80°C for about 30 min in the presence of 200 mL of H
2SO
4 0.25N. To ensure a constant volume of boiling medium, hot water is regularly added. After filtering the mixture, the residue is washed with hot water to remove residual acid. The residue was then treated with 200 mL of NaOH 0.32N and washed again with hot water, ether and alcohol to obtain an alkaline extract. The alkaline extract was then transferred to a crucible and dried overnight at about 90-100°C and weigh (Wi) with an electronic balance. The crucible is put into a muffle furnace and heated at 600°C for 5.5-6 hours. After cooling, the crucible was weighed again (Wa)
(Khan et al., 2013). The difference in mass (W
i - W
a) corresponding to the crude fiber content (3)
..........(3)
W
i: Dry weight after digestion.
W
a: Weight of ash.
W
o: Weight of moisture and fat free sample.
Determination of total ash
To determine the ash content, the dried samples underwent combustion within a muffle furnace set at 600°C for a period lasting 5 to 6 hours
(Khan et al., 2013). The following equation was used to calculate the ash content (4).
..........(4)
W
a: Weight of ash.
W
d: Weight of dried sample.
Total phenolic content loss (TPCL)
The specified extraction procedure was employed for the extraction of phenolics. Samples and the extractant (ethanol 50%) were placed in a beaker, mixed in 5 h at 40°C then filtrated and stored at -20°C for further experiments. Total phenolic content loss (TPCL) was calculated by (5)
..........(5)
The modified Folin-Ciocalteu procedure, as reported by
Singleton et al., (1999), was used to determine the total phenolic content (TPC) of the samples. The solution of Folin-Ciocalteu was mixed with 1 mL of the sample in a ratio of 5:1. After a period of 3 min, 4 mL of Na
2CO
3 7.5% (w/v) solution was added to the mixture and the volume was adjusted to 10 mL with deionized water. The mixture was then placed in the dark at room temperature for one hour before measuring its absorbance at 765 nm using an Agilent 8453 UV Spectrophotometer. TPC of
S. heptaphylla leaf extract was determined in milligrams of gallic acid equivalent (GAE) using a standard curve prepared with different concentrations of gallic acid. TPC values are reported as milligrams of GAE per gram of dry weight (DW). Three measurements were taken and the average value was recorded. TPCL values, according to raw
S. heptaphylla leave, were then calculated using equation (5):
Total flavonoid content loss (TFCL)
The extraction method was employed for flavonoid extraction. Samples and the extractant (ethanol 50%) were placed in a beaker, mixed in 5 h at 40°C then filtrated and kept in storage at -20°C for further experiments. Total flavonoid content loss (TFCL) was calculated by (6):
..........(6)
The TFCs of the samples were analyzed using the AlCl
3 method, modified by
Marinova et al., (2005). Prepare 10 ml volumetric flasks, each containing 4 ml of H
2O, to which add 1 ml of catechin extract or standard solution (0.01÷ 0.07 mg/mL). Then, 0.3 mL of NaNO
2 5% was added to each flask. After an interval of 5 minutes, add 0.3 mL of AlCl3 10%. Then, 2 mL of NaOH 1M was added after 6 min and the final volume of each flask was adjusted to 10 mL with H
2O. The solution was mixed thoroughly and its absorbance was then measured at 510 nm using an Agilent 8453 spectrophotometer.
Measurement was made against a previously prepared reagent blank. TFC of leaves of
S. Heptaphylla was quantified as mg Catechin equivalent (mgCE) per gram dry weight (DW). Three replicates were measured and the mean was recorded. Then, TFCL values were calculated based on equation (6), using raw
S. heptaphylla leaves.
Experimental design
Using the central composite design (CCD) of the response surface method (RSM), the study examined the main effects of process variables on total phenolic loss (TPCL), total loss of flavonoid content (TFCL) and moisture (MC) during production. drying process of
S. Heptaphylla leaves. As independent variables, the study chose drying temperature (X
1), drying air velocity (X
2) and drying time (X
3).
The study used a central composite design (CCD) consisting of 20 experiments, formed by 6 pivot points and 6 central points, combined with a full 8 factorial design.
..........(7)
The values of the parameters (β
0, β
i, β
ii and β
ij) of the left-hand side in (7) were evaluated by the Design Expert Ver program. 11.0. The evaluation is made based on the agreement of the experimental results with the full quadratic polynomial model with three independent variables as in (7).