High-quality cricket feces: A vital source of essential elements for rice
The cricket feces used in this study exhibited superior quality in various indicators compared to the organic fertilizer standard set by the Department of Agriculture (
National Bureau of Agricultural Commodity and Food Standards, 2005). In this study, the cricket feces’ pH was 7.19 and C/N ratio was 10, with 29.5 g N/kg, 18.3 g P/kg and 28.1 g K/kg (Table 1), while the Department of Agriculture’s standards were pH 5.5-8.5, C/N ratio of 20, with 10 g N/kg, 2.2 g P/kg and 4.1 g K/kg (
National Bureau of Agricultural Commodity and Food Standards, 2005). Although the EC of the cricket feces used in this study exceeded the standard of 3.5 mS/cm, with a value of 9.18 mS/cm (Table 1), it did not result in soil salinity. This is seen in the EC ranging from 0.32 to 0.49 mS/cm observed in the soils treated with cricket feces (Table 2).
The application of cricket feces increased the concentrations of macronutrients in the soil, as demonstrated by increases in total N, NH
4+-N, NO
3--N, P, K, Ca and Mg (Table 2) and raised the content of these nutrients in the rice tissue (Table 3). As a result, the growth of rice plants was improved, which is exhibited by the increases in the shoot and root biomass of the rice plant, ultimately resulting in a higher rice yield (Table 4).
Soil acidity and AI toxicity alleviated by cricket feces
The increased cricket feces rates generally resulted in decreased soil acidity, as seen in the increased pH and decreased concentrations of exchangeable acidity and Al in the soil (Table 2).
In this study, the initial soil exhibited an Al concentration of 4
.20 mg/kg (Table 1). According to
Slattery et al., (1999), Al concentrations ranging from 4 to 8 mg/kg in soil were considered highly toxic, suggesting that soil Al levels in the present study were highly toxic
. However, the decreases in Al concentration in soil amended with cricket feces might not be solely attributed to the increases in pH
. Instead, it might be due to the chelation of Al to organic anions, as reported by
Hue (1992), who found that malate, citrate and tartrate chelated with Al in soil
. Later,
Hue et al., (2001) found that organic materials such as animal manures contained compounds that act both as a reducing agent and as a chelate with acidic elements in the soil, including Mn, Fe and Al
.
Cricket feces decreased the toxicity of Ca and Na by providing K and Mg
The Ca content in rice tissue typically fell within the range of 2.42-4.46 g/kg (Table 3). This range was considered as high level (3 g/kg) according to
Reuter et al., (1997). Nonetheless, cricket feces could decrease Ca contents in rice tissue by providing K and Mg.
Although cricket feces served as a vital source of K, Ca and Mg (Table 1), thereby increasing the concentrations of these cations in the soil (Table 2), the contents of K and Mg in rice tissue increased in proportion to the application rates of cricket feces (Table 3), mirroring the trend observed in the soil (Table 2). However, Ca contents in rice tissue (Table 3) displayed an inverse relationship with soil Ca concentration (Table 2), suggesting an antagonistic effect between K and Mg with Ca.
Mengel and Kirkby (2001) demonstrated that the antagonistic relationship between K and Mg toward Ca uptake led to a decrease in the plant absorption of Ca. Additionally, plants had a higher affinity for K uptake than other cations. While the precise mechanism by which Mg counteracted Ca had not been fully understood, plants might be better able to uptake Mg than Ca due to the higher affinity of Ca for binding to organic and inorganic colloids in soil. In a study on a synthetic gel containing alginate-citrate composites,
Wang et al., (2021) reported that the gel exhibited a Ca and Mg absorption capacity of 62.4 and 36.2 mg/g, respectively. According to
Chi et al., (1977), the adsorption power of Ca on the exchangeable site of clay particle surfaces was stronger than that of Mg. It was further observed that the behavior of Na in soil (Table 2) and in rice tissue (Table 3) was similar to that of Ca, which was attributed to the antagonistic effects of K and Mg against Na (
Mengel and Kirkby, 2001). The underlying mechanism behind this phenomenon might be similar to that of Ca.
The optimum cricket feces rates and their effects on yield and yield components of rice
In soils with the maximum water-holding capacity, the application of medium and high rates of cricket feces resulted in the highest rice yield, while in flooded soils, the highest yield was obtained when a high rate of cricket feces was applied. This was supported by the filled grain weight and total grain weight per hill (Table 4). The grain weight of rice was found to increase with both medium and high rates of cricket feces in soils with the maximum water-holding capacity, as well as with the high rate of cricket feces in flooded soils. This was attributed to the increases in total grain number per hill, which in turn was due to the increases in panicle number per hill. This elucidation was supported by the significant increases in panicle number per hill in soils with the maximum water-holding capacity that received medium and high rates of cricket feces, compared to those that did not receive cricket feces or received the low rate (Table 4). The number of panicles per hill of rice in these treatments corresponded to the tillering. This finding suggested that the increased rice yield observed with the application of cricket feces was due to its ability to enhance the tillering of rice plants.
Tillering was closely associated with the number of panicles and the number of grains in each hill, ultimately contributing to the rice yield (
Wang et al., 2017). The tillering capacity of rice was influenced by the availability of plant nutrients (
Fageria, 2014), as demonstrated in this study by the direct relationship between the contents of N, P, K and Mg in rice tissue were directly related to the tillering and yield of rice (Fig 1) and the increases in the concentrations and contents of these nutrients in the soil (Table 2) and rice’s shoot tissue (Table 3), respectively. Tillering was significantly influenced by N and P (
Murata and Matsushima, 1979), which stimulated cytokinin synthesis in tiller nodes and promoted cell division of the rice (
Zha et al., 2022). Moreover, N was shown to facilitate tiller development (
Sakakibara et al., 2006).
Although a lack of direct evidence had yet been found to establish the relationship between K and tillering,
Zain and Ismail (2016) reported that K caused an increase in rice’s tillering. The K generally played a key role in activating enzymes, protein synthesis, photosynthesis, stomatal opening and closing, cellular manipulation and osmotic pressure regulation (
Mengel and Kirkby, 2001). Similar to K, there had been no direct evidence of how Mg influenced the tillering. However,
Deng et al., (2023) found that Mg caused an increase in tillering in rice. The Mg was generally involved in a number of essential metabolic processes, including photosynthesis, the transport of photosynthate and the stimulation of numerous enzymes in rice plants (
Mengel and Kirkby, 2001).