Plant height
The study revealed that plant height differed significantly among the varieties and between the two years of experimental study. It was also observed that an interaction existed between the varieties and year (Table 1). In the first year, plant height attained its highest value in Kuwait 2, whereas California Marriot recorded the maximum value in the second year (Table 1). In addition, previous studies have shown that the plant height is one of the factors that determine the grain yield of crop plants
(Alqudah et al., 2016). The plant height displayed a significant positive correlation with hundred kernel weight in both years and grain yield only in the second year in the study (Table 2 and 3). The increasing yield with plant height could be attributed to the increased ability of crop light interception with taller plants, thereby enhancing photosynthesis and yield
(Jiang et al., 2020). The results were in agreement with the results obtained by
Minale et al., (2011), which reported higher grain yield in plants with higher plant height.
Number of tillers/m2
The number of tillers significantly differed between the varieties in the study due to the genetic variation in the reproductive development
(Karsai et al., 1999; Ogrodowicz et al., 2017 Borras et al., 2009; Alqudah and Schnurbusch 2013). The highest value was reported by Kuwait 4 without any significant difference from Kuwait 5 and Kuwait 6 (Table 1). In addition, the overall mean number of tillers was increased by 11% in the second year which could be attributed to the impact of environmental factors in promoting or repressing lateral shoot development through a network of hormonal and regulatory signals
(Shaaf et al., 2018). But no interaction was observed between the varieties and the year of the experimental study. The correlation analysis has shown that number of tillers presented a significant positive correlation with biomass yield as well as grain yield (Table 2 and 3) as increased number of tillers could lead to more number of panicles per square meter and thus improve yield
(Badshah et al., 2014).
Number of days to heading
The heading date differed significantly among the varieties and between the two years of experimental study. In addition, an interaction existed between the varieties and the year of the experimental study. In the first year, Kuwait 5 produced the highest value without significantly differing from Kuwait 2 and Maythorpe. In the second year, Kuwait 4 presented the highest value which was significantly different only from varieties
ari-e. GP and Maythorpe (Table 1). Previous studies have demonstrated that environmental adaptation and improvement of yield and yield components is highly associated with heading duration. The early heading varieties could overcome the negative effects of high temperature and shortage of rainfall according to
Kobata et al., 2018. The varieties
ari-e. GP and Foma exhibited early heading in both seasons of the study. Late heading extends the vegetative phase which in turn increases the biomass accumulation and is associated with higher digestibility
(Turner et al., 2005; Laidlaw, 2005). In the second year, a significant positive correlation was noted between number of days to heading and biomass yield.
Hundred kernel weight
The hundred kernel weight differed significantly between the varieties, whereas the year factor did not impose any significant effect. In addition, no interaction was observed between the two factors. The overall mean value over two years showed that the highest hundred kernel weight was obtained by Kuwait 3 without any significant difference from varieties Kuwait 1, Kuwait 2, Kuwait 4, Kuwait 5, Kuwait 6, California Marriot and Gustoe (Table 1). Previous studies have reported variation of hundred kernel weight between crop, within varieties of a crop, from field to field and from year to year (
Miller and McLelland, 2007). The hundred kernel weight in the study also reported a significant positive correlation with grain yield in agreement to several previous studies (
Hadjichristodoulou, 1990).
Grain yield
The grain yield is an important trait of a cereal which is highly influenced by production environment and it varied significantly between the varieties and the year in the study. Besides, an interaction was observed between the two factors (Fig 1). In the first year, the highest grain yield was shown by the variety Kuwait 6 with any significant difference from Kuwait 4, whereas in the second year, Kuwait 2 exhibited the highest value without any significant difference from varieties Kuwait 1, Kuwait 3, Kuwait 4,
ari-e. GP and California Marriot. The results obtained showed that varieties Kuwait 4 and Kuwait 3, produced higher grain yield over the two individual years of experimental study (Fig 1). The correlation analysis in the study has revealed that biomass yield and hundred kernel weight revealed a significant positive correlation with grain yield under both first and second years (Table 2 and 3). This correlation could be attributed to the translocation of assimilates stored in stem and leaf reserves before anthesis to the grain
(Daniels et al., 1982).
Biomass yield
The barley biomass yield is influenced by several factors which includes genotypes, fertilizers, irrigation, environmental factors (
Al-Tawaha et al., 2003). The biomass yield differed significantly between the genotypes as well as years, whereas an interaction between the two factors was not found (Fig 2). The overall mean value of the biomass yield of the varieties under study was increased by 32% in the second year. The results showed that variety Kuwait 3 consistently produced higher biomass yield over the two individual years of experimental study (Fig 2). The higher biomass yield noted with some varieties could be due to the increased water and fertilizer use efficiency in these varieties when compared to others. In the study, the biomass yield displayed a highly significant positive correlation with grain yield and number of tillers/m2 in both first and second seasons (Tables 2 and 3). Our results were in agreement with other previous studies that identified biomass yield as a selection criterion in breeding for grain yield owing to it positive correlation with grain yield (
Hadjichristodoulou, 1991).