Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Soil-plant Nutrient Status and Relations in Common Cereal Crop Growing Fields of Kambata Tembaro Zone, Southern Ethiopia

Alemu Lelago1, Wassie Haile2, Mesfin Bibiso1,*, Sheleme Beyene2, Tegbaru Bellete3
1Department of Chemistry, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia.
2Hwassa University, Ethiopia.
3Agricultural Transformation Agency, Ethiopia.
Background: Plant analysis and soil testing are necessary to assess the fertility status of soils and their capacity to feed plants and when necessary, to recommend balanced fertilizers. This study aimed to evaluate the soil and plant nutrient status and their relationships in different cropping systems of the Kambata Tembaro (KT) zone, in southern Ethiopia.

Methods: Maize, tef, sorghum and wheat leaves from 28, 55, 29 and 75 smallholder farmers’ fields, respectively with their respective soil samples were collected and analyzed. 

Result: The soil pH ranged from strongly acidic to neutral. The mean separation method confirmed that the means of all soil properties investigated in this study showed significant differences (P<0.001) among different crop-growing fields. Soil available P and S, total N, extractable B and Cu were deficient in most of the soils and plant tissues. The amount of exchangeable K, Ca, Mg and Zn were found to be sufficient in soils of the study area but their deficiency was recorded in most of the tissues. Soil available P, exchangeable K, Ca and Zn significantly (P<0.01) and positively correlated (r= 0.33, 0.37, 0.20 and 0.15), respectively with tissue content of the respective elements. 
The depletion of soil fertility caused by erosion, organic matter and plant nutrient removal, intensive crop cultivation, low and unbalanced fertilizer use, removal of vegetative cover (such as straw or stubble) and nutrient imbalances are among the major challenges affecting agricultural productivity and food security in Ethiopia (Haileselassie et al., 2005; Tadele et al., 2013). In Ethiopia, the depletion rate of N, P and K was reported to be 122, 13 and 82 kg ha-1 year-1, respectively; this was estimated to be the highest in sub-Saharan Africa (Haileselassie et al., 2005). Until recently, the major sources of fertilizers being used in Ethiopia have been diammonium phosphate (DAP) and urea, which supply only N and P. However, it was only in 2014 that the fertilizer recommendation package started to change dramatically. This indicates that very little attention has been given to other macro and micronutrients (Wondwosen and Sheleme, 2011).

Maize, tef, wheat and sorghum are the main cereal crops being cultivated in Kambata Temabaro zone. The average yield in the zone with blanket N and P application rate is 2.46, 1.06, 1.67 and 1.98 t/ha for maize, tef, wheat and sorghum, respectively. This level is lower than the national average yield level for the mentioned crops. In order to boost the yield of crops, knowledge about soil-crop interaction is very vital. However, there is very limited or no research study on soil-plant nutrient relation in the study area. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the soil and plant nutrient status and their relationships in different cropping systems of KT Zone, southern Ethiopia.

Soil sampling and analysis

A total of 309 soil samples were taken from 0-20 cm depth using auger from 80 maize, 95 tef, 80 wheat, 36 sorghum and 18 enset growing fields of Kedida Gamela, Kecha Bira and Damboya woredas, KT zone, Southern Ethiopia in 2021. Soil pH (1:2 soil: water suspension) was measured with a pH meter and glass electrode. Available P, available S, exchangeable basic cations and extractable micronutrients were determined using Mehlich-III multi-nutrient extraction method (Mehlich, 1984). Mid-infrared diffused reflectance spectral analysis was also used to determine the amount of soil OC, TN and CEC. Particle size distribution, pH, OC, TN and CEC were analyzed at the National Soil Testing Center, Addis Ababa. The concentration elements were analyzed at Yara International Soil Laboratory in London following standard laboratory procedures.

Plant sampling and analysis

About 25 leaves per field were collected from different plants and homogenized to make one representative sample for a field. From the composite samples, sub-samples were taken for analyzing macronutrients and micronutrients. The tissue analysis was carried out at Horticoop Soil and Water Analysis Laboratory, at DebreZeit, in Ethiopia. Nitrogen was determined using Kjeldahl distillation procedure. Plant digests using concentrated hydrochloric acid were prepared to extract and analyze P, K, S, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn using inductively coupled plasma spectrometry.


Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics was applied for calculation of means, median standard errors and CV. Correlation analysis was performed to assess relationships among soil and plant nutrient contents. Differences at the P<0.05 level of significance were reported as significant.

The fertility status of soils collected from different crop growing fields

The mean pH value under enset crop was found to be the highest followed by maize in all woredas whereas the lowest pH was recorded under wheat growing field (Table 1). This may be due to farmers’ application of house refuse and wood ash for improving the fertility of the soils (Chakoro et al., 2015). The existence of the lowest mean pH value in wheat growing field could be due to application by farmers more N fertilizers for wheat than other crops without proper management of acidic soils.

Table 1: Soil pH, EC, available P and S, OC and TN in soils of different crop growing fields of KT zone, southern Ethiopia.



The mean separation showed that the means of both available P and S significantly (P<0.001) varied among crops. Relatively highest mean value of P and S was obtained in enset field followed by maize field. This is due to the fact that enset is commonly cultivated on plots or fields close to the homesteads where ash and house refuse are commonly added to the soil by farmers (Tittonell et al., 2005).

Total nitrogen and OC in enset and wheat fields were relatively high. This might be due to the materials added to the soil from the plant parts and organic inputs (application of manure and domestic waste). Also, enset has highly degradable vegetative parts which are used to maintain soil fertility (Chakoro et al., 2015).

The highest mean values of all exchangeable bases were observed in enset growing field (Fig 1). This may be due to reduction in leaching and possible reduction in loss of nutrients by enset, (Eyob 2014; Hilette et al., 2015).

Fig 1: Means of exchangeable basic cations of soil samples collected from different types of crop growing fields.


 
Soil micronutrient status
 
The Mehlich-3 extractable micronutrients showed statistically significant (P<0.001) differences among different types of crop growing fields. The highest mean of Cu, Mn, B and Fe were obtained from enset growing fields whereas the highest mean value for Zn was obtained in wheat growing fields (Table 2). 

Table 2: Soil micronutrient of maize, tef, sorghum wheat a growing.



The Mehlich-3 extractable Fe ranged from 67.30 to 209.72, 46.84 to 217.8, 70.15 to 233.32, 107.74 to 211.03 and 103.87 to 221.12 mg kg-1 in maize, tef, sorghum, wheat and enset growing fields, respectively.  Also, the Melich-3 extractable Zn ranged from 1.50 to 2 5.70, 1.3 to 29.00, 1.50 to 20.4, 1.6 to 38.70 and 7.20 to 39.02 mg kg-1 in maize, tef, sorghum, wheat and enset growing fields, respectively. In this study, considering 20 and 1.5 mg kg-1 Melich-3 extractable Fe and Zn, respectively, as critical levels, samples from all crop growing fields were found to have sufficient level of available Fe and Zn.

Plant tissue nutrient content and relationship with soil nutrients

Soil and plant tissue macronutrient status

According to Schwab et al. (2007); Fageria et al. (2011); Jones et al., (1991) and Engel and Zubriski (1982), in all plant tissues regardless of type of crops TN is insufficient. This result confirms that N is the major yield limiting element in the study areas. Inadequate level of N in plant tissue may be due to low soil organic matter, poor agronomic practices, application of low N fertilizer than the recommended rate and continuous cultivation.

According to Schwab et al. (2007) and Fageria et al. (2011) P was found to be deficient in 96.43, 85, 89.66 and 69.44% of maize, tef, sorghum and wheat leaf tissues, respectively. This indicates that, more or less, the soil test and plant tissue tests are equally important to manifest P deficiency (Fig 2). Also, about 89, 87, 87 and 61% of maize, tef, sorghum and wheat tissue were deficient in K. The result reflects unexpectedly the deficiency of K in plant tissue even though the soil test showed almost all soil samples have adequate amount of K (Fig 2). 

Fig 2: The relation of the deficiency level (%) of nutrient.



Wide variability existed in both Ca2+ and Mg2+ contents within plant tissues. Both Ca and Mg were sufficient in maize plant tissue while Ca were deficient in 50, 10.35 and 59.72% of tef, sorghum and wheat plant tissues, respectively. Similarly, 94.50, 75.86 and 85.00% often, sorghum and wheat plant tissues analyzed were found to be deficient in Mg. This result also showed that deficiency of Ca and Mg in some plant tissues occurred regardless of their excess amounts in the soil (Fig 2).
 
Soil and plant tissue micronutrient status
 
Wide variability existed in the micronutrient contents in the plant tissue samples (Table 3). According to Schwab et al. (2007); Fageria et al. (2011); Jones et al., (1991) and Engel and Zubriski (1982),considering 6 ppm for maize and sorghum and 4.5 ppm for tef and wheat as critical levels of Cu, 97, 89.1, 34 and 88.89% of maize, tef, sorghum and wheat plant tissues analyzed were found to be deficient in Cu. This indicates that the Cu deficiency is manifested more in tissue test than in soil test (Fig 2). This may be due to the factors that retard copper uptake by plants. But in all plant tissue samples, both Fe and Mn were sufficient.

Table 3: Nutrient concentration in plant tissue samples.



According to Schwab et al. (2007); Fageria et al. (2011); Jones et al. (1991) and Engel and Zubriski (1982), it was found that 68, 60, 62 and 41.67% of maize, tef, sorghum and wheat plant tissues analyzed were found to be deficient in Zn. This revealed that Zn is one of the limiting nutrients in some parts of the study areas despite the fact that its amount is sufficient in the soil (Fig 2).

Soil and plant nutrient relationships

The result of correlation analysis revealed that the plant tissue content of P, K, Ca and Zn showed positive and significant (P<0.01) correlation (Table 4). But the plant tissue Mg, Cu, Fe and Mn concentrations showed a non-significant (P>0.05) relationship with their respective amounts in the soil. This non-significant correlation indicates the existence of other factors than the nutrient content in the soil which are responsible for this poor correlation.

Table 4: Pearson correlation matrix for relationship between soil and plant tissue nutrients in KT Zone, Southern Ethiopia.



From the correlation analysis, it was found that correlated positively and significantly (P<0.05) with tissue Ca and K concentrations. Soil pH affects the solubility, availability and uptake of soil nutrients (Mesfin, 2007). The tissue P concentration was also positively and significantly correlated with soil K and tissue Ca, Mg and Cu. Also, tissue Ca and Mg concentrations correlated positively and significantly (P<0.01) with soil P and K but the correlation with Zn was found to be negative and significant. According to Westermann et al., (2011), the excess of P can cause deficiency of nutrients such as Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn. In addition to this, K uptake correlated positively and significantly with soil P, Ca and Mn.

The plant tissue analysis showed the deficiency of K, Cu, Mg and Zn regardless of their high amount in the soil, thus calling for further study to identify the factors that inhibit their availability for plants. In order to increase crop production, the deficient elements mainly N, P, K, S, Cu, Zn and B should be included in the fertilizer program of the study areas. Also this it can be concluded that soil available P, exchangeable K, Ca and Zn significantly and positively correlated.
None.

  1. Chakoro, T. and Mekuria, A. (2015). Role of Enset [Enseteventricosum (Welw.) Cheesman] in soil rehabilitation in different agro- ecological Zones of Hadiya, Southern Ethiopia. American Journal of Environmental Protection. 4(6): 285-291.

  2. Eyob, T. (2014). Fertility mapping of soils in Alicho-Woriro Woreda in Siltie zone, Southern Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

  3. Engel, R.E. and Zubriski, J.V. (1982) Nitrogen concentration in spring wheat at several growth stages. Commun in Soil Sci Plant Anal. 13: 531-544

  4. Fageria, N.K. and V.C. Baligar. (2005). Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Advances in Agronomy. 88: 97-185.

  5. Fageria, N.K., Baligar, V.C. and Jones, C.A. (2011). Growth and Mineral Nutrition of Field Crops. 3rd ed. CRC Press, USA.

  6. Haileselassie, A., Priess, J.A., Veldkamp, E., Teketay, D. and Lesschen, J.P.  (2005). Assessment of soil nutrient depletion  and its spatial variability on smallholders’ mixed farming systems in Ethiopia using partial versus full nutrient balances. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment. 108: 1-16.

  7. Hillette, H., Tekalign,M., Riikka, K., Erik, K.,  Heluf, G. and Taye, B. (2015). Fertility status and wheat nutrient contents in vertisol cropping system of central highlands of Ethiopia. Agriculture and Food Security. 4: 19.

  8. Jones, J.B., Jones. J.P., Stall, R.E. and Zitter, T.A. (1991). Compendium of tomato disease. American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, 73.

  9. Mehlich, A. (1984). Mehlich III soil test extractant: A modification of Mehlich II extractant. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 15: 1409-1416.

  10. Mesfin, A. (2007). Nature and Management of Acid Soil in Ethiopia. Haramaya University. Haramaya, Ethiopia.

  11. Schwab, G.J., Lee, C.D., Pearce, R. and Thom, W.O. (2007). Sampling plant tissue for nutrient analysis. University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension. AGR-92.

  12. Tadele, A., Aemro, T., Yihenew, G., Birru, Y., Bettina, W. and Hans, H. (2013). Soil properties and crop yields along the terraces and toposequece of Anjeni Watershed, central highlands of Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Science. 5(2): 134-144.

  13. Tittonell, P., Vanlauwe, B., Leffelaar, P., Rowe, E. and Giller, K. (2005).  Exploring diversity in soil fertility management of smallholder farms of western Kenya I. Heterogeneity at region and farm scales. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 110: 149-165. 

  14. Westermann, D., Terán, H., Muñoz-Perea, C. and Singh, S. (2011). Plant and seed nutrient uptake in common bean in seven organic and conventional production systems. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 91(6): 1089-1099. 

  15. Wondwosen, T. and Sheleme, B. (2011). Identification of growth limiting nutrient (s) in Alfisols: Soil physico-chemical properties, nutrient concentrations and biomass yield of maize. American Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization Technology. 1: 23-35.

Editorial Board

View all (0)