Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi
Print ISSN 0367-8245
Online ISSN 0976-058X
NAAS Rating 5.60
SJR 0.293
Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi
Print ISSN 0367-8245
Online ISSN 0976-058X
NAAS Rating 5.60
SJR 0.293
Soil-plant Nutrient Status and Relations in Common Cereal Crop Growing Fields of Kambata Tembaro Zone, Southern Ethiopia
Submitted08-01-2022|
Accepted16-12-2022|
First Online 30-12-2022|
Soil sampling and analysis
A total of 309 soil samples were taken from 0-20 cm depth using auger from 80 maize, 95 tef, 80 wheat, 36 sorghum and 18 enset growing fields of Kedida Gamela, Kecha Bira and Damboya woredas, KT zone, Southern Ethiopia in 2021. Soil pH (1:2 soil: water suspension) was measured with a pH meter and glass electrode. Available P, available S, exchangeable basic cations and extractable micronutrients were determined using Mehlich-III multi-nutrient extraction method (Mehlich, 1984). Mid-infrared diffused reflectance spectral analysis was also used to determine the amount of soil OC, TN and CEC. Particle size distribution, pH, OC, TN and CEC were analyzed at the National Soil Testing Center, Addis Ababa. The concentration elements were analyzed at Yara International Soil Laboratory in London following standard laboratory procedures.
Plant sampling and analysis
About 25 leaves per field were collected from different plants and homogenized to make one representative sample for a field. From the composite samples, sub-samples were taken for analyzing macronutrients and micronutrients. The tissue analysis was carried out at Horticoop Soil and Water Analysis Laboratory, at DebreZeit, in Ethiopia. Nitrogen was determined using Kjeldahl distillation procedure. Plant digests using concentrated hydrochloric acid were prepared to extract and analyze P, K, S, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn using inductively coupled plasma spectrometry.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics was applied for calculation of means, median standard errors and CV. Correlation analysis was performed to assess relationships among soil and plant nutrient contents. Differences at the P<0.05 level of significance were reported as significant.
The fertility status of soils collected from different crop growing fields
The mean pH value under enset crop was found to be the highest followed by maize in all woredas whereas the lowest pH was recorded under wheat growing field (Table 1). This may be due to farmers’ application of house refuse and wood ash for improving the fertility of the soils (Chakoro et al., 2015). The existence of the lowest mean pH value in wheat growing field could be due to application by farmers more N fertilizers for wheat than other crops without proper management of acidic soils.
Plant tissue nutrient content and relationship with soil nutrients
Soil and plant tissue macronutrient status
According to Schwab et al. (2007); Fageria et al. (2011); Jones et al., (1991) and Engel and Zubriski (1982), in all plant tissues regardless of type of crops TN is insufficient. This result confirms that N is the major yield limiting element in the study areas. Inadequate level of N in plant tissue may be due to low soil organic matter, poor agronomic practices, application of low N fertilizer than the recommended rate and continuous cultivation.
According to Schwab et al. (2007) and Fageria et al. (2011) P was found to be deficient in 96.43, 85, 89.66 and 69.44% of maize, tef, sorghum and wheat leaf tissues, respectively. This indicates that, more or less, the soil test and plant tissue tests are equally important to manifest P deficiency (Fig 2). Also, about 89, 87, 87 and 61% of maize, tef, sorghum and wheat tissue were deficient in K. The result reflects unexpectedly the deficiency of K in plant tissue even though the soil test showed almost all soil samples have adequate amount of K (Fig 2).
Soil and plant nutrient relationships
The result of correlation analysis revealed that the plant tissue content of P, K, Ca and Zn showed positive and significant (P<0.01) correlation (Table 4). But the plant tissue Mg, Cu, Fe and Mn concentrations showed a non-significant (P>0.05) relationship with their respective amounts in the soil. This non-significant correlation indicates the existence of other factors than the nutrient content in the soil which are responsible for this poor correlation.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.