The effects of cultivar, nitrogen fertilizer rate, plant density and location on the sorghum ash content
Cultivar had a significant effect (P<0.001) on the sorghum ash content during the 2016/17 planting season, as indicated in Fig 1. Sorghum cultivar PAN 8625 had a significantly higher ash content of 4.47% than PAN 8816 (3.54%). The difference between the two cultivars in terms of ash content could be attributed to the genetic constitution. This corroborates the findings by
Telleng et al., (2016), who reported an increase in the ash content among one of the varieties of sorghum planted.
Nitrogen fertilizer rate and location had a significant effect (P≤0.05) on the sorghum ash content during the 2017/18 planting season, as indicated in Fig 2 and 3, respectively. Sorghum without nitrogen fertilizer application had a significantly higher ash content of 4.438% than sorghum fertilized with 100 (4.32%) and 150 kg (4.31%) N/ha. These findings are contradictory to the findings by
Hassan et al., (2014), who reported increased ash content with increased nitrogen application.
Sorghum planted at Taung had a significantly higher ash content of 4.40% than sorghum planted at Mafikeng (4.31%). These results could be attributed to the difference in soil type, its soil nutrient status and the variable rainfall recorded at the two locations. This corroborates the findings by
Jimoh and Abdullahi (2017), who reported that an increase in ash content of sorghum could be attributed to the nature of the soil and the amounts of nutrient in the soil. During the 2017/18 planting season, the interactions of nitrogen fertilizer rate × plant density × location had a significant effect (P=0.009) on the sorghum ash content.
The effects of cultivar, nitrogen fertilizer rate, plant density and location on the sorghum fiber content
Cultivar had a significant effect (P<0.001) on the sorghum fiber content during the 2016/17 and 2017/18 planting seasons, as indicated in Fig 1. Sorghum cultivar PAN 8625 had a significantly higher fiber content of 10.60% and 9.67% than PAN 8816, with fiber content of 7.35% and 7.13% during the 2016/17 and 2017/18 planting seasons.
Ayub et al., (2010) also reported significant differences in fiber content among eight cultivars tested.
Location had a significant effect (P=0.005) on the sorghum fiber content during the 2016/17 planting season, as indicated in Fig 3. Sorghum planted at Taung had a significantly higher fiber content of 9.80% than sorghum planted at Mafikeng (8.14%). Variations in the crude fiber contents of various sorghum cultivars were also reported by
Telleng et al., (2016) and
Hunsigi et al., (2010). Higher fibre content obtained at Taung could also be attributed to better rainfall during growing season as reported by
Islam and Sebetha (2020).
During the 2017/18 planting season, the interaction of nitrogen fertilizer rate × plant density × location had a significant effect (P=0.027) on the sorghum fiber content.
The effects of cultivar, nitrogen fertilizer rate, plant density and location on the sorghum oil content
Cultivar had a significant effect (P<0.001) on the sorghum oil content during the 2017/18 planting season, as indicated in Fig 1. Sorghum cultivar PAN 8816 had a significantly higher oil content of 5.45% than PAN 8625 (4.1%). The observed differences in oil content could be attributed to the differences in grain size of the two sorghum cultivars. This corroborates the findings by
Shen et al., (2010), who reported that the oil content in maize seed is influenced by the size of the seed embryo and the oil concentration in the embryo and endosperm.
Location had a significant effect (P<0.001) on the sorghum oil content during the 2016/17 and 2017/18 planting seasons, as indicated in Fig 3. Sorghum planted at Mafikeng had a significantly higher oil content of 5.01% than sorghum planted at Taung (3.69%) during the 2016/17 planting season. Sorghum planted at Mafikeng also had a significantly higher oil content of 5.01% than sorghum planted at Taung (4.54%) during the 2017/18 planting season. This could be attributed to differences in rainfall and temperature prevailed at the two locations. These result corroborate the findings by
Mikulíková et al., (2011), who reported that starch content in cereals is significantly influenced by the prevailing weather.
During both seasons, the interactions of cultivar × location had a significant effect on the sorghum oil content.
The effects of cultivar, nitrogen fertilizer rate, plant density and location on the sorghum protein content
Cultivar and location had a significant effect (P<0.001) on the sorghum protein content during the 2017/18 planting season, as indicated in Fig 1 and 3, respectively. Sorghum cultivar PAN 8816 had a significantly higher protein content of 8.87% than PAN 8625 (6.74%). In previous studies,
Ahmad et al., (2016) also reported significant differences among sorghum cultivars for protein content. Sorghum planted at Taung had a significantly higher protein content of 8.31% than sorghum planted at Mafikeng (7.31%). This corroborates the findings by
Sebetha et al., (2015), who reported that maize seeds harvested from Taung had a significantly higher protein content than at Mafikeng.
During the 2016/17 planting season, the interactions of nitrogen fertilizer rate × location had a significant effect (P<0.045) on the sorghum protein content. During the 2017/18 planting season, the interactions of cultivar × location had a significant effect (P=0.032) on the sorghum protein content.
The effects of cultivar, nitrogen fertilizer rate, plant density and location on the sorghum starch content
Cultivar had a significant effect (P<0.001) on the sorghum starch content during the 2017/18 planting season, as indicated in Fig 1. Sorghum cultivar PAN 8816 had a significantly higher starch content of 43.55% than PAN 8625 (35.79%). These results are consistent with findings by
Palavecino et al., (2016), who reported that sorghum cultivars differ significantly in starch content.
Location had a significant effect (P<0.001) on the sorghum starch content during the 2016/17 planting season, as indicated in Fig 3. Sorghum planted at Mafikeng had a significantly higher starch content of 38.50% than sorghum planted at Taung (24.5%). The higher starch content from sorghum planted at Mafikeng might be attributed to better environmental conditions such as rainfall and temperature.
Adebayo et al., (2021) reported the improved in maize performance from the same location.
During both the planting seasons, the interactions of cultivar × location had a significant effect on the starch content of sorghum.