Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.217, CiteScore: 0.595

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Impact of Rice Straw and Nitrogen Levels on Yield and Quality of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Anurag Yadav1, Rajesh Kumar1,*, Swati Mehta1, Navjot Rana1, Gumpi Kabak1, Rohit Saral1, Ravi Verma1
  • 0000-0002-9507-4867, 0000-0002-3843-8310, 0000-0001-8926-5053, 0000-0001-8920-4867
1Department of Agronomy, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara-144 401, Punjab, India.
Background: The incorporation of rice straw and the application of nitrogen are key factors influencing wheat production. Rice straw, as a residue, contributes to soil organic matter and nutrient cycling while nitrogen is crucial for plant growth and grain development. Understanding their combined impact is essential for optimizing wheat yield and improving grain quality in sustainable agricultural systems.

Methods: The study was conducted at Research Farm, Division of Agronomy, Lovely Professional University during rabi 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 focused on the impact of various rice straw management practices and nitrogen levels on the yield and quality of wheat emphasizing the importance of sustainable agricultural practices. The experimental field had sandy loam soil with slightly alkaline pH (7.6), moderate organic carbon content alongside low concentrations of essential nutrients viz, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. It comprised 12 treatments arranged in Split plot Design and replicated three times to evaluate two main factors Rice Straw management: S0: Control, S1: Super seeder and S2: Pusa bio decomposer and nitrogen levels: N0 : Control (no nitrogen), N1: 75% of the recommended dose (RDN), N2: 100% of RDN, N3 : 125% of RDN.

Result: The results demonstrated that the S2 and N3 treatments significantly improved wheat performance, with the highest values for effective tillers (93.58, 91.74/m row), grains per spike (43.71, 42.20), and test weight (43.30, 42.23 g). Grain yield peaked at 49.75 q/ha (S2) and 51.26 q/ha (N3), while straw yield and biological yield also showed corresponding increases. The harvest index, although non-significant, reflects trends consistent with these yield improvements. Quality attributes were enhanced under S2 and N3 treatments, with maximum protein content (12.88%, 12.53%), protein yield (905.44 kg/ha, 854.94 kg/ha), and levels of essential amino acids (lysine, tryptophan, phenylalanine).
As a foundation of global agriculture, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) stands as India’s second-most vital crop, right after rice. Known for its adaptability, wheat flourishes in a variety of soils and climates. Around 80-85% of wheat is milled into atta, the key ingredient in staples like chapattis. Soft wheat is prized for bakery items, while hard wheat is used to make semolina and sewaiya. Nutritionally, wheat is packed with 78% carbohydrates, 12% protein, and 2% fat, alongside essential vitamins and minerals (Kumar et al., 2011). Its straw further supports agricultural sustainability as essential livestock fodder.
       
Once dismissed as “wastes,” crop residues are now valued as “potential black gold” for their nutrient-rich content that boosts agricultural productivity (Reicosky and Wilts, 2005). In India, significant crops like rice, wheat, maize, and sugarcane generate around 686 million tonnes of residues annually, with cereals (364MT) being the largest contributors followed by sugarcane (56 MT) and others (47 MT) (Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, 2020). Effective management of these residues is becoming increasingly important amid rising environmental concerns about chemical inputs in agriculture (Dadhich et al., 2012).
       
Rice straw, a widely available agricultural byproduct, represents one of the most abundant lignocellulosic wastes in the world. Given that rice is a staple food for over half of the global population, particularly in Asia, this resource is particularly significant (Singh and Arya, 2021). Other crop residues, such as pearl millet husk, groundnut shell, and sesame stover, often go to waste due to their high carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratios and lack of use as animal feed. Unfortunately, ineffective management leads to these residues being burned in fields, causing environmental pollution and depleting essential soil nutrients.
       
Therefore, integrating crop residues with inorganic fertilizers represents a powerful strategy for enhancing soil health and boosting long-term crop productivity. This holistic approach not only maintains crop yields but also improves nutrient use efficiency and enriches soil fertility. By leveraging the synergy between these resources, we pave the way for a more sustainable agricultural future that maximizes the benefits of our natural assets.
Location and climate
 
The research trial was conducted during Rabi season of 2022-23 and 2023-2024 at the experimental farm of Department of Agronomy, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University in Phagwara, Punjab, India. The farm is situated at 31o14'35.2" North latitude and 75o41'48.2" East longitude in a semi-arid, subtropical climate with 245 m average elevation from above mean sea level (Fig 1). Most of the annual rainfall (500-800 mm) occurred during the monsoon season, between July and September, with groundwater found at depths of 90-100 meters.

Fig 1: Description of study site.


 
Experimental design and crop management
 
The study conducted from 2022-23 to 2023-24 assessed the impact of different rice straw management techniques and nitrogen levels on wheat yield and soil health. A split-plot design with 12 treatment combinations, replicated three times across 36 plots, was used to evaluate two main factors: The two key factors tested were: Rice Straw Management: S0 : Control (no straw) S1: Sowing with Super Seeder (incorporating straw directly into the soil) S2: Straw decomposed using Pusa Bio Decomposer (decomposed 20 days before application) and Nitrogen Levels: N0: Control (no nitrogen), N1: 75% of the recommended dose (RDN), N2: 100% of RDN, N3: 125% of RDN. Rice straw decomposed with the Pusa Bio Decomposer was incorporated into designated plots before sowing. The straw underwent microbial decomposition for 20 days to enhance nutrient availability (Kumar and Pareek, 2022).
       
The wheat variety PBW 824 was sown using the drilling method. Data collection included measurements of crop growth, biomass, grain yield and nutrient uptake along with soil nutrient content and organic carbon levels. Pre and post-treatment soil samples were analyzed for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium levels. This combination of innovative rice straw management and nitrogen application provided valuable insights into sustainable practices that enhance wheat productivity and improve soil health over the long term.
       
The soil, characterized as sandy loam from the Central alluvial plain, exhibited a pH of 7.6 and an electrical conductivity (EC) of 0.47ds/m. Initial tests conducted in October 2022 revealed moderate organic carbon content (0.57%) alongside low concentrations of essential nutrients, including nitrogen (183.7 Kg/ha), phosphorus (26.4 Kg/ha) and potassium (192.3 Kg/ha).
 
Estimation of yield attributes of wheat
 
The total numbers of ear bearing tillers/meter row length from the two sampling rows were recorded from each plot at harvest. Average of both the counts was taken for statistical analysis. Length of ear from the point of attachment of the lower most primary rachis to the tip of the panicle of ten spikes collected randomly from the tagged plants from the sampling rows. Length of the ear from each plot was measured and the average length of ear was calculated (cm). One thousand grains were randomly taken from the bulk produce of each net plot and were counted and weighed manually and their weight was recorded in grams.
 
Estimation of yield
 
Grain yield and straw yield (q/ha)
 
From the individual plot, net plot area was harvested; sun dried for 3-4 days and was subsequently threshed (through thresher) and cleaned. The grain thus obtained, were weighed and expressed in quintals per hectare (q/ha). The total biological yield (grain + straw) from the net plot was recorded and straw yield was worked out by subtracting the grain yield from the biological yield and expressed in q/ha.
 
Harvest index (per cent)
 
The ratio of economic yield to the biological yield (harvest index) was computed using the following formula as given by Donald and Hamblin (1976).
 
 
  
Estimation of quality parameters
 
Protein content (per cent)
 
Protein content of wheat grain was determined by multiplying respective nitrogen content in wheat grain with a factor 6.25 (AOAC International, 1970).
 
Tryptophan (per cent)
 
Alkaline hydrolysis (commonly with barium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide) is used to release tryptophan, as acid hydrolysis can degrade tryptophan. The percentage of tryptophan is calculated using the formula:
 
 
 
Lysine (per cent)
 
The protein in the sample is hydrolyzed using acid hydrolysis (e.g., 6N HCl at high temperature for several hours). This breaks down proteins into their constituent amino acids, including lysine. Then high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to separate and quantify lysine.
Yield parameters
 
The application of different rice straw treatments and nitrogen levels significantly influenced various yield parameters of wheat. Among the rice straw treatments, S2 (straw decomposed by Pusa decomposer) consistently resulted in the highest values for yield parameters. Specifically, effective tillers per meter row length for S2 were 93.58, compared to 84.57 for S1 and 74.35 for S0. Similarly, increasing nitrogen levels, particularly N3 (125% RDN), significantly improved all yield components, with effective tillers reaching 91.74 at N3, compared to 81.74 at N1 and 73.64 at N0 (Table 1). The rise in tiller numbers associated with higher nitrogen levels can be linked to the well-established role of nitrogen in promoting vigorous vegetative growth in plants. This enhancement not only supports tiller development but also contributes to the overall productivity of the crop. Results are in conformity with the study done by Iqbal et al., (2012).
       
For the number of grains per spike, the S2 treatment had 43.71 grains, outperforming both the control (S0) at 30.67 grains and the super seeder (S1) at 37.11 grains. In parallel, increasing nitrogen levels, especially at N3, contributed to higher grain numbers, with 42.20 grains (Table 1). These findings are in agreement with the work of Ashish and Tiwana (2023), Iqbal et al., (2012) who reported that the enhanced allocation of assimilates, driven by the progressive increase in nitrogen levels, fostering greater photosynthetic efficiency (Ouyang et al., 2021).

Table 1: Effect of rice straw management and nitrogen levels on effective tillers, number of grains per spike and test weight of wheat.


       
The test weight (in grams) also followed a similar trend, with S2 achieving 43.30 g and N3 recording 42.23 g, both reflecting improved grain filling under optimal straw decomposition and nitrogen supply (Table 1). Results are in conformity with the study done by Ali et al., (2011). The organic matter from decomposed rice straw fosters optimal growth conditions, leading to heavier and denser wheat grains. These findings support the conclusions of previous research by Sharma et al., (2021).
 
Yield
 
In terms of grain yield (q/ha), the combined effects of rice straw management and nitrogen levels were evident, with S2 producing 49.75 q/ha and N3 yielding 51.26 q/ha (Fig 2). The decomposition of rice straw in S2 likely enhanced soil health and microbial activity, leading to greater grain production. These findings support the conclusions of previous research done by Vashisht et al., (2021). While N3 provided the necessary nitrogen for maximizing yield potential. These findings are in conformity with Kousar et al., (2015) state that the increased grain yield with sufficient nitrogen supply could potentially be attributed to delayed leaf senescence, allowing for prolonged photosynthetic activity and enhanced nutrient translocation to the grains (Prem et al., 2024).
       
Straw yield also increased with both S2 at 69.87 q/ha and higher nitrogen levels (N3 at 67.71 q/ha) (Fig 2), indicating that both decomposed straw and sufficient nitrogen promote overall biomass production. The outcomes of this study corroborate earlier findings by Sharma et al., (2021) that the incorporation of rice straw, improves soil organic matter, boosting microbial activity, and increases nutrient availability. This process enriches the soil environment, supporting greater wheat biomass production (Elhag et al., 2017). The increase in straw yield can be attributed to improved soil moisture availability, which facilitated the uptake of essential nutrients during the growing season (Goyal et al., 2009). This not only enhanced yield components but also contributed to the accumulation of greater dry matter in the plants. These findings are consistent with Sharma and Dhaliwal (2020) who also observed similar trends.
       
The biological yield, was highest in the S2 treatment at 119.62 q/ha and N3 at 118.97q/ha (Fig 2), reflecting the combined benefits of straw decomposition and nitrogen application. The enhancement in biological yield with higher nitrogen levels is likely a result of nitrogen’s role in promoting vigorous vegetative growth and stimulating a greater number of tillers, particularly at elevated nitrogen application rates. These outcomes of this research support earlier work by Shah et al., (2011).

Fig 2: Effect of rice straw management and nitrogen levels on grain, straw, biological yield and harvest index of wheat.


       
However, the harvest index was found to be non-significant across all treatments, indicating that the proportion of grain to total biomass remained relatively stable, suggesting no substantial impact from the treatments on this parameter.
 
Quality parameters
 
The quality attributes of wheat were profoundly influenced by both rice straw treatments and nitrogen levels. In terms of protein content, the treatment S2 (straw decomposed by Pusa decomposer) exhibited the highest percentage at 12.88%, surpassing S1 (sowing with super seeder) at 11.89% and the control (S0) at 10.64% (Fig 3). This enhancement in protein content likely resulted from the improved soil nutrient availability and microbial activity associated with straw decomposition (Saini et al., 2013). These finding are in conformity with Zhang et al., (2019). Similarly, nitrogen application levels positively impacted protein content, with N3 (125% RDN) achieving 12.53%, compared to 10.53% at N0. Similar conclusions were drawn by Sharma and Dhaliwal (2020), Vaswani et al., (2013).

Fig 3: Effect of rice straw management and nitrogen levels on protein content and protein yield of wheat.


       
Regarding protein yield (kg/ha), the S2 treatment produced 905.44 kg/ha, significantly outperforming S1 at 754.71 kg/ha and S0 at 587.72 kg/ha. This increase in protein yield can be attributed to both higher protein content and greater biomass production under effective straw management. The results of this research align well with insights documented in existing literature by Zhang et al., (2019). Nitrogen levels also played a crucial role, with N3 yielding 854.94 kg/ha, significantly higher than the control level of 573.75 kg/ha (Fig 3).
       
Finally, the concentrations of essential amino acids were influenced by both treatments and nitrogen levels. S2 exhibited the highest levels of tryptophan (1.55%), lysine (3.44%), and phenylalanine (5.10%), showcasing the benefits of effective straw management on grain quality. Nitrogen treatments further enhanced amino acid profiles, with N3 resulting in 1.51% tryptophan, 3.41% lysine, and 5.18% phenylalanine (Table 2), emphasizing the positive impact of adequate nitrogen supply on the nutritional quality of rice grains.

Table 2: Effect of rice straw management and nitrogen levels on amino acid (tryptophan, lysine and phenylaline) in wheat grain.

In India, where sustainable farming is increasingly important, efficient rice straw management and optimized nitrogen application are crucial for boosting crop productivity.
This study found that the use of Pusa decomposer (S2) resulted in a grain yield of 49.75 q/ha and a protein content of 12.88%, significantly higher than the control. Similarly, the application of 125% RDN (N3) produced a grain yield of 51.26 q/ha and a protein content of 12.53%, under scoring the benefits of proper nitrogen management. These results show that integrating straw decomposition with optimal nitrogen use leads to enhanced yield and    improved grain quality, offering a pathway for sustainable wheat farming in India.
All the authors acknowledge and thank Division of Agronomy, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara for their guidance and support.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
All experimental procedures and handling techniques were approved Lovely Professional University, Punjab.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced for conducting study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Ali, A., Ahmad, A., Syed, W.H., Khaliq, T., Asif, M., Aziz, M. and Mubeen, M. (2011). Effects of nitrogen on growth and yield components of wheat. (Report). Science International (Lahore). 24: 331-332.

  2. AOAC International. (1970). Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

  3. Dadhich, S.K., Pandey, A.K., Prasanna, R., Nain, L. and Kaushik, B.D. (2012). Optimizing crop residue-based composts for enhancing soil fertility and crop yield of rice. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 82: 85-88.

  4. Donald, C.M., and Hamblin, J. (1976). Biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 27(3): 331-347. https:// doi.org/10.1071/AR976033.

  5. Elhag, D. (2017). Effect of different nitrogen rates on productivity and quality traits of wheat cultivars. Egyptian Journal of Agronomy. 39(3): 321-335.

  6. Goyal, S., Singh, D., Suneja, S. and Kapoor, K.K. (2009). Effect of rice straw compost on soil microbiological properties and yield of rice. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 43(4): 263-268. https://arccjournals.com/journal/indian- journal-of-agricultural-research/ARCC1540.

  7. Iqbal, J., Hayat, K., Hussain, S., Ali, A. and Bakhsh, M.A.A.H.A. (2012). Effect of seeding rates and nitrogen levels on yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 11(7): 531.

  8. Kousar, P., Ali, L., Raza, A., Maqbool, A., Maqbool, S., Rasheed, S. and Irum, N. (2015). Effect of different levels of nitrogen on the economic yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) variety Aas-11. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research. 6(3): 7-11.

  9. Kumar, R. and Pareek, B.L. (2022). Effect of organic manure, Azospirillum and inorganic fertilizer on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The Pharma Innovation Journal. 11(2): 2179-2183.

  10. Kumar, V., Pandey, A.K., Prasad, R.K and Prasad, B. (2011). Long-term influence of organic and inorganic sulphur and fertility levels on yields, distribution and build-up of sulphur under rice-wheat cropping system in calciorthents. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 59:  278-282.

  11. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. (2020). Operational guidelines on promotion of agricultural mechanization for in-situ management of crop residue in the states of Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Delhi.

  12. Ouyang, J.L., Qi, R.X., Chen, Y.F., Shahzad, K., Li, P.F. and Wang, M.Z. (2021). Effects of rice straw silage with combining additives of Lactobacillus plantarum, Trichoderma viride and wheat bran on the growth performance, digestibility and rumen fermentation in growing lambs. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 55(3): 310-314. https://arccjournals.com/ journal/indian-journal-of-animal-research/B-1090.

  13. Prem, G., Kumar, N., Poddar, A., Mehta, A.R. and Kumar, R. (2024). Residue and irrigation management for optimizing productivity and profitability of wheat in Ambala (Haryana). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 58(Special Issue): 1079- 1086. https://arccjournals.com/journal/indian-journal-of- agricultural-research/A-6324.

  14. Reicosky, D.C., Wilts, A.R. (2005). Crop-residue management in: Reference module in earth systems and environmental Sciences. Encyclopaedia of Soils in the Environment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 334-338.

  15. Saini, M.K., Phutela, R.P. and Walia, U.S. (2013). Effect of straw management techniques and herbicides on soil microbes in wheat in rice-wheat system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 47(2): 130-136. https://arccjournals.com/ journal/indian-journal-of-agricultural-research/ARCC017.

  16. Satlewal, A., Agrawal, R., Bhagia, S., Das, P. and Ragauskas, A.J. (2018). Rice straw as a feedstock for biofuels: Availability, recalcitrance, and chemical properties. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. 12(1): 83-107.

  17. Shah, W.A., Khan, H.U., Anwar, S., and Nawab, K. (2011). Yield and yield components of wheat as affected by different seed rates and nitrogen levels. Sarhad J. Agric. 27(1): 17-25.

  18. Sharma, A., Singh, B., and Kumar, R. (2021). Nitrogen and rice straw incorporation impact nitrogen use efficiency, soil nitrogen pools, and enzyme activity in rice-wheat system in north- western India. Soil and Tillage Research. 212: 105048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105048 .

  19. Sharma, S. and Dhaliwal, S.S. (2020). Rice residue incorporation and nitrogen application: Effects on yield and micronutrient transformations under rice-wheat cropping system. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 43(18): 2697-2711. https://doi. org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1783295.

  20. Sharma, S., Singh, P. and Choudhary, O.P. (2021). Nitrogen and rice straw incorporation impact nitrogen use efficiency, soil nitrogen pools and enzyme activity in rice-wheat system in north-western India. Field Crops Research. 266: 108131.

  21. Singh, J., and Arya, R.K. (2021). A review on management of rice straw by use of cleaner technologies: Abundant opportunities and expectations for Indian farming. Journal of Cleaner Production. 291: 125278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro. 2020.125278.

  22. Tiwana, U and Kumar, Ashish. (2023). Response of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties to Nitrogen Levels. 11. 1511-1515.

  23. Vashisht, B.B., Jalota, S.K., Ramteke, P., Ramandeep Kaur,  and D.K. (2021).Jayeswal. Impact of rice (O. sativa L.) straw incorporation induced changes in soil physical and chemical properties on yield, water and nitrogen–balance and- use efficiency of wheat (T. aestivum L.) in rice-wheat cropping system: Field and simulation studies. Agricultural Systems. 174.

  24. Vaswani, S., Kumar, R., Kumar, V., Roy, D. and Kumar, M. (2013). In vitro evaluation of wheat straw varieties for chemical composition, gas production and digestibility. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 47(6): 555-557. https://arccjournals.com/ journal/indian-journal-of-animal-research/ARCC195.

  25. Zhang, F., Che, Y. and Xiao, Y. (2019). Effects of rice straw incorporation and N fertilizer on ryegrass yield, soil quality, and greenhouse gas emissions from paddy soil. J. Soils Sediments 19: 1053-1063.

  26. Zhao, X., Yuan, G., Wang, H., Lu, D., Chen, X. and Zhou, J. (2019). Effects of full straw incorporation on soil fertility and crop yield in rice-wheat rotation for silty clay loamy cropland. Agronomy. 9(3): 133.https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9030133.

Editorial Board

View all (0)