As per the available literature, this is the first-ever study on ESBL-producing
E.
coli from salad vegetables collected from retail shops in Mirzapur district, Uttar Pradesh, India. The initial screening of raw salad vegetables in our study revealed the presence of cefotaxime-resistant
E.
coli in 41.96% (94/224) of the samples from which a total of 276 cefotaxime-resistant
E.
coli isolates were recovered and subjected to phenotypic detection of ESBL production by CDM (Table 1). A similar result was reported by
Shakerian et al., (2016), who found
E.
coli in 49.6% of salad vegetable samples, suggesting that contamination level in raw vegetables may be consistently high across different geographical regions due to improper hygiene and handling practices. However, a significantly higher isolation rate of
E.
coli (86%) was documented in ready-to-eat salad vegetables collected from an area where crops were irrigated with untreated sewage water (
Castro-rosas et al., 2012). This highlights the critical role of irrigation water quality in bacterial contamination, supporting the hypothesis that poor agricultural practices exacerbate microbial risks in fresh produce. Studies from India have reported a wide range of
E.
coli occurrence in raw vegetables, varying from 12.6% to 66.0%
(Saksena et al., 2020), along with the occurrence of other pathogens like
Salmonella spp. (38.14%) and
Shigella spp. (25.25%) (
Gundappa and Gaddad, 2016). These variations can be attributed to differences in sampling locations, agricultural practices and post-harvest methods. In our study, vegetable-wise comparison indicated that radish had the highest contamination rate (62.50%), followed by coriander (53.12%), carrot (46.87%), green chilies and beetroot (43.75% each), tomato (21.87%) and cucumber (18.75%) (Table 2). The higher contamination rate in root vegetables such as radish, carrot, beet root, as well as coriander could be due to their direct contact with soil, which is often contaminated with animal excreta, irrigation water (pond, canal or river) or untreated sewage. This finding aligns with previous studies where
E.
coli contamination was found in 15% of tomatoes and 20% of carrot samples (
Mritunjay and Kumar, 2017). In contrast, a much lower occurrence of
E.
coli was observed in fresh vegetables in Aizawl, India, where only 4.88% of tomatoes, potatoes and cabbage samples were tested positive. Similarly other studies
(Fiedler et al., 2017) reported minimal contamination rates in tomatoes (0.08%) and leafy vegetables (0.79%-1.30%). These discrepancies might stem from variations in environmental conditions, food safety regulations and differences in hygienic agricultural practices. Additionally, (
Tambekar and Mundhada, 2006) highlighted the link between salad vegetables and bacterial contamination, emphasizing that these vegetables are frequently consumed raw with minimal washing without any heat treatment, thereby increasing the risk of food-borne infections. Our study reinforces these concerns, indicating that raw vegetables serve as a significant reservoir of
E.
coli, necessitating improved hygiene measures during cultivation, handling and distribution to mitigate potential health risks.
In this study, 99.27% (274/276) of the recovered cefotaxime-resistant
E.
coli isolates were observed to be phenotypically positive for ESBL production. This means that, all the samples that were contaminated with cefotaxime-resistant
E.
coli (41.96%) also harboured ESBL-producing
E.
coli, as the same isolates were evaluated for ESBL production (Table 1). Our results contrast sharply with those of
Pintor-Cora et al. (2021), where only 11.96% (14/117) and 2.85% (7/47) of vegetable samples were positive for ESBL-producing
E.
coli. Similarly, a study from Nigeria reported a lower occurrence, with 24.4% vegetables, 20% ready-to-eat salad vegetables and 36.6% vegetables obtained from vendors and open markets, were found to harbour ESBL-producing
E.
coli. These discrepancies may be due to differences in agricultural and food handling practices, the level of antimicrobial use in farming and regional variations in microbial contamination sources. The high occurrence of ESBL phenotypes in our study may be attributed to the potential transfer of resistance genes from environmental and commensal microbiota
(Zurfluh et al., 2015). Additionally, the use of a selective medium (cefotaxime-supplemented EMB agar) and the strategy of picking multiple colonies from each sample likely contributed to a higher detection rate in our study. This is further supported by the findings of
Satyaprakash et al., (2024), who reported a similarly high occurrence of phenotypic ESBL production (91.29%) among the cefotaxime-resistant
E.
coli isolates (n=310) recovered from environmental sources of eastern parts of Uttar Pradesh (Mirzapur, Prayagraj, Varanasi, Jaunpur and Sonbhadra districts), India. In one more study
Jaya et al., (2025) potentiate the use of Antimicrobial peptide on production performance, egg quality and serum biochemical parameters of laying hens. Another similar kind of study done in Indonesia by
Wibawati et al., (2025), on occurrence of Antibiotic-resistant
Proteus mirabilis and
Proteus vulgaris in African Catfish (
Clarias sp.) Since
E.
coli is a well-recognized faecal indicator organism, its detection in raw salad vegetables strongly suggests unhygienic conditions during cultivation, harvesting, transportation and retailing-whether due to accidental contamination or anthropogenic activities. The presence of such high levels of ESBL-producing
E.
coli in fresh produce underscores the urgent need for stricter food safety measures and better sanitation practices to minimize the risk of AMR bacterial transmission through food chain.
All 274 ESBL-producing
E.
coli isolates were subjected to phenotypic detection of biofilm formation by CRA and MPA methods. The CRA method revealed BDAR and RDAR morphotypes in 70.80% (194/274) and 29.19% (80/274) of the isolates, respectively, while PDAR and SAW morphotypes were not exhibited by any of the tested isolates, suggesting that all isolates had the potential to form biofilms. By MPA, biofilm production was evident in 94.16% (258/274) of the isolates, with 79.45% (205/258) being weak, 17.05% (44/258) moderate and 3.48% (9/258) strong biofilm producers. A significant difference (p<0.05) was observed between CRA and MPA methods for detecting biofilm formation in ESBL-producing
E.
coli isolates (Table 3). These results align with a study on 130 ESBL-producing
E.
coli isolates obtained from clinical samples, where the majority were also weak biofilm producers followed by moderate and strong biofilm producers as exhibited by MPA
(Kim et al., 2018). Similarly,
Abdulhaq et al., (2020) reported that the detection of biofilm formation in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa increased from 44.23% using CRA method to 94.23% when tested by MPA, highlighting the greater sensitivity of the microtiter plate method. Like wise,
Amrutha et al., (2017) found that, among 35
E.
coli isolates from fruit and vegetable samples, only 22.2% exhibited biofilm formation by the CRA method, while all were positive by MPA, with varying degrees of biofilm production. These findings reinforce that MPA is more reliable and quantitative method for biofilm detection, whereas CRA, despite being rapid and simple screening method, has lower sensitivity, specificity and accuracy
(Amrutha et al., 2017). The interpretation of CRA results varies across studies, which may explain the differences in positivity rates. Many studies consider the red colonies on CRA plates as negative for biofilm formation and black colonies as positive
(Harika et al., 2020). However, our study followed the interpretation criteria of
Nesse et al., (2020), which recognizes the RDAR morphotypes as indicative of curly fimbriae and cellulose expression, while, BDAR results from fimbriae expression without cellulose- both confirming biofilm forming potential. Differences in CRA interpretation across studies could explain the lower positivity rate reported in some research compared to our findings.
Genotypic analysis revealed that one or more biofilm forming genes (
fimH,
Sfa and
papC) were detected in 92.33% (253/274) of phenotypically positive ESBL-producing
E.
coli isolates using multiplex PCR assay. The
fimH gene was predominant (77%, 211/274), followed by
Sfa (11.31%, 31/274) and
papC (4.01%, 11/274) (Table 4a). These findings are consistent with a study in Northwest Iran, where
fimH was identified as the major genetic determinant of biofilm formation
(Tajbakhsh et al., 2016). However, other studies have reported varying degree of detection of genes such as Davari
Abad et al., (2019), who found
sfa gene at a higher frequency among uropathogenic
E.
coli. Similar study was done by
Lade et al., (2025), in India on Milk sample as coexpression of Methicillin-resistant
S.
aureus and ESBL Producing
E.
coli in Mastitic Milk of Buffaloes. The observed significant difference (p<0.05) between phenotypic (CRA and MPA methods) and genotypic (PCR) methods for detection of biofilm detection (Table 4a and 4b) further highlights the complex regulatory mechanisms of biofilm formation, which are influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Moreover, a significant difference (p<0.05) was observed between biofilm forming genes and the vegetable-wise occurrence of ESBL-producing
E.
coli isolates (Table 5), suggesting that contamination sources and environmental conditions play a crucial role in biofilm formation. The co-occurrence of ESBL production and biofilm formation is particularly concerning, as biofilms enhance bacterial persistence in the environment and contribute to antimicrobial resistance by limiting antimicrobial penetration
(Dutt et al., 2022). This could explain why biofilm-forming bacteria pose a significant risk.
Out of the 274 ESBL-producing
E.
coli isolates, Shiga-like toxin genes were detected in only three isolates (one
stx1 gene in an isolate recovered from a carrot sample and two
stx2 genes in two isolates recovered from coriander samples) by PCR assay. All the three isolates were also biofilm producers, with
fimH as the major genetic determinant. Similar findings were reported by
Verma et al., (2018), who identified four Shiga toxin-producing (STEC)
E.
coli isolates from 73
E.
coli isolates recovered from fruits and vegetables.
Adator et al., (2018) demonstrated that STEC could survive within dry-surface biofilms and transfer to fresh lettuce, emphasizing the role of biofilms in pathogen persistence. In another study, STEC was detected in 6% of carrot samples, 12% of lettuce, 3% of cucumbers and 8% of leafy vegetables with two lettuce STEC isolates found to be positive for the O157 serogroup
(Kholdi et al., 2021). These findings suggest that biofilm formation may provide a survival advantage for STEC, increasing the risk of contamination in fresh produce. Raw vegetables are important components of the human diet, yet they are vulnerable to microbial contamination. Several outbreaks of STEC infections have been linked to contaminated leafy greens and salad vegetables
(Wendel et al., 2009). The presence of ESBL-producing
E.
coli with biofilm-forming ability, along with STEC genes in fresh produce, underscores the urgent need for improved hygiene practices during cultivation, harvesting, transportation and retailing to mitigate public health risks.