Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Genetic and Phenotypic Insights into Seed Characteristics for Enhancing Yield Potential in Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]

Anil Kumar1,*, N.K. Sharma2, Anita3, Komal Shekhawat1, Swarnlata Kumawat1
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Bikaner Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner-334 006, Rajasthan, India.
2Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner-334 006, Rajasthan, India.
3Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Sri Karan Narendra College of Agriculture, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner, Jaipur-303 329, Rajasthan, India.

Background: The study investigates the genetic variability, heritability and character association among seed characteristics in mungbean genotypes. Mungbean is an important pulse crop and understanding its genetic diversity is crucial for breeding programs aimed at improving seed traits such as size, weight and yield. This research employs statistical analyses to evaluate the extent of genetic variability and to explore the relationships between various seed characteristics. 

Methods: In this field-laboratory investigation, field experiments were conducted with 35 mungbean genotypes over four environments created by four different dates of sowing in Randomized Block design (RBD) with three replications at College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner, Rajasthan during summer-2019, Kharif-2019 and Kharif-2020.

Result: Highly significant differences were found among all genotypes for all seed traits studied. The high degree of genetic variability along with high heritability and high genetic advance as per cent of mean were observed for water absorption capacity, water absorption index and porosity which reveals that these characters were under the control of additive gene action and therefore, form the basis of selection for mungbean improvement programme. Among seed traits, water absorption index and 100-seed weight had positive correlation with seed yield and directly contributed towards seed yield.

Pulses are an important source of staple protein for vegetarians which constitute a major population of the country. Mungbean is also known as green gram, an ancient pulse crop widely cultivated under different agro-ecological situations in India mainly during Kharif and summer seasons (Kumar et al., 2024). It is a diploid species having chromosome number (2n=22) belongs to family Leguminosae (Fabaceae), sub-family Papilionaceae and is botanically recognized as Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek (Anita et al., 2022). Mungbean is a native of South Asia (India). Vigna radiata var. sublobata is the possible progenitor of mungbean. It is basically a self-pollinated crop (Singh et al., 2015).
       
After chickpea and pigeon pea in terms of production and area, mungbean is the third most significant pulse crop in India. India is a major producer of mungbean and at the same time India identified as the largest consumer of mungbean in the world (Sneha et al., 2020). In India, the total area covered under mungbean is 4.607 million hectares with a production of 2.448 m tons and a productivity of 513 kg/ha in the country during 2017-18 to 2021-2022 (Directorate of Pulses Development, 2022). Currently, the realized average productivity of mungbean is well below the economic level (Rahmianna et al., 2021).      
       
Pulses play an important role in supplying the needs of food in human society, especially in developing countries. Determination of physical and mechanical properties of seeds and agricultural products is important in designing of harvesting, handling and processing equipment, transport, yield and store of the crop. Physical parameters of seed affect vegetative growth and are frequently related to yield, market grade and harvest efficiency. Some physical properties of seeds viz., 100-seed weight, seed volume and seed size are the important characteristics for designing equipment for the transportation of agricultural produce (Peleg, 1985). Genetic variation is the cause for variation in the size of seed between varieties. Many researchers investigated the variation on seed size for seed germination following seedling emergence and related agronomic aspects in mungbean. Generally, the larger seed has better field performance than the small seed. The 100-seed weight is one of the important characters and represents the size, quality and density of seeds which are also affected by environment and genetic factors (ICARDA, 2005). Therefore, it is essential to achieve basic scientific information about these seed characteristics.
       
High yield is the basic objective of all crop breeding programmes. In any program aimed at genetic improvement of yield, existence of variability is the basic requirement (Azam et al., 2018). The available genetic variability for the traits of interest, especially yield and its attributes are to be exploited by mungbean breeders in order to broaden and strengthen genetic potential. Yield is a complex character and depends upon the action and interaction of a number of factors. The relative contributions of these different characters to seed yield can be estimated by correlation analysis. However, correlation studies do not provide an exact picture of the relative importance of direct and indirect influence of each of them. The path coefficient analysis further allows the partitioning of correlation coefficients of yield-related characters into their direct and indirect effects (Gogoi et al., 2024).
       
Keeping all these points in view, the present study was planned to assess genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance, correlation and path coefficient for seed yield and its contributing seed traits in mungbean in order to identify the most promising traits of interest and genotypes to be considered in future mungbean crop improvement programmes.
The experimental material consisting of thirty-five genotypes were procured from NBPGR, Regional Station, Jodhpur; Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur; Agricultural Research Station, Sriganganagar and Agricultural Research Station, Mandor, Jodhpur is given in Table 1. Field experiments were conducted at College of Agriculture, Bikaner, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner, Rajasthan during summer-2019 and Kharif-2019. The experimental material consisted of 35 genotypes of mungbean was evaluated in randomized block design with three replications accommodating 3 meter long two rows per replication at 30 cm spacing under sprinkler irrigated situation in four different environments created by four different dates of sowing viz., (i) summer season: (A) early sowing (6th March 2019) and (B) late sowing (20th  March 2019); (ii) Kharif season: (C) early sowing (6th  July 2019) and (D) late sowing (20th July 2019). All the recommended package of practices was adopted to raise a good crop. The observation for seed yield was recorded on individual plant basis on five randomly selected plants from each genotype of each replication.

Table 1: Details of mungbean genotypes used in investigation.


       
The laboratory experiment was conducted from the harvested seeds with same 35 genotypes of mungbean for three replications of each mungbean genotype under completely randomized design (CRD) studied at room temperature at Department of Biotechnology, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner, Rajasthan during Kharif-2020. The data on seven seed parameters viz., 100- seed weight, seed volume, true density, bulk density, porosity, water absorption capacity and water absorption index studied at room temperature were estimated and recorded. The procedure adopted to record the observations for each character is given below:
 
100-seed weight (g)
 
Well dried 100-seeds were counted from bulk seeds of each genotype and weighed on electrical balance.
 
Seed volume (µl/seed)
 
Seed volume was measured by ‘Liquid displacement technique’ (Shepherd and Bhardwaj, 1986). Water was used to determine seed volume. For each mungbean genotype 100-seeds were weighed and put into a 100 ml measuring cylinder containing 15 ml (initial reading) of water that could completely cover all the seeds. Seed volume was calculated according to Mohsenin (1986) by using the formula:
 
  
 
True density (g/cm3)
 
True density was determined using the ‘Toluene displacement method’ (Mohsenin, 1986; Singh and Goswami, 1996). Toluene (200 ml) was filled in a 500 ml graduated measuring cylinder and 100g seeds were immersed in it. The amount of toluene displaced was recorded. The true density was estimated as the ratio of sample mass to the volume of displaced toluene.
 
Bulk density (g/cm3)
 
Bulk density was determined following the method reported by Singh and Goswami (1996) and Gupta and Das (1997) by filling a 500 ml cylinder with seeds from a height of 15 cm at a constant rate. Excess seeds were levelled off with a metal rod and then the contents were weighed. Bulk densities were calculated as the ratio of the mass of the sample to the volume of the container and expressed in gcm-3. Tests were carried out without tapping the cylinder and compacting the seeds.      
 
        

Where,
B.D. = Bulk density (in gcm-3).
T.D. = True density (in gcm-3).

 

Porosity (%)
 
The porosity of bulk seed was computed from the values of true density and bulk density using the following formula (Singh and Goswami, 1996):
 

 

 Where,
B.D. = Bulk density (in gcm-3).
T.D. = True density (in gcm-3).
 
Water absorption capacity (mg/seed)
 
To calculate the water absorption capacity, 100 seeds from each replication were weighted, soaked in water and was maintained at room temperature for 12 hours. The seeds were then removed from water and the excess moisture on the seed surface was removed with filter paper and seeds were weighted. Water absorption capacity in terms of mg per seed was calculated as per Mohsenin (1986):
 

 

Where,
WAC = Water absorption capacity.
 
Water absorption index
 
 The water absorption index was obtained by dividing the water absorption capacity of a single seed by its size/weight (Williamsa et al., 1983).
  

 

       
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done by subjecting the data to the statistical method described by Panse and Sukhatme (1985). The statistical analysis was performed using INDOSTAT 8.1 and XLSTAT 2021.2.2 software. Genotypic variances and phenotypic variances were calculated according to Johnson et al., (1955); Comstock and Robinson (1952), respectively from the expectations of mean squares by using an ANOVA table for each character. Heritability in a broad sense was calculated as suggested by Burton and Devane (1953). The expected genetic advance for each character was calculated as suggested by Johnson et al., (1955). Phenotypic correlation and path coefficients of variation were computed as per the method given by Dewey and Lu (1959).

The analysis of variance revealed significant differences among genotypes for all seven seed traits which indicate the presence of good amount of variability in the genotypes and scope of selection for genetic improvement of mungbean (Table 2). The results confirmed the findings of Adlan (2019) in mungbean, Get et al., (2019) in lentil, Pal et al., (2020) and Meena et al., (2021) in mothbean.

Table 2: Analysis of variance of mungbean genotypes for various traits.


       
On the basis of mean performance over environments, highest seed yield was observed in GM 4 followed by RMG 344, RMG 62, IC 39492, SML 832, Keshwanand Mung 1, MUM 2, IC 39269, IC 102821, IC 102857, MH 2-15, Samrat, IC 103059 and IC 39328 (Table 3). Mungbean is a self-pollinated crop therefore; all above mentioned varieties/genotypes could directly be used for cultivation under irrigated normal soil and water situation of arid zone as well as in future breeding programme to develop superior varieties. Similar findings were earlier reported by Baraki et al., (2020), Samyuktha et al., (2020) and Kumar et al., (2024).

Table 3: Mean performance of mungbean genotypes for seed yield per plant over four environments.


       
High GCV and PCV were found for water absorption capacity, water absorption index, porosity and seed yield per plant. Include the lowest and highest values for all traits. Therefore, high degree of heritable genetic variability in these seed traits reveals the good scope of selection for these traits (Table 4). Similar findings were earlier reported by Adlan (2019) in mungbean and Get et al., (2019) in lentil. High heritability coupled with high/moderate genetic advance as per cent of mean was observed for water absorption capacity, water absorption index, porosity, seed volume, 100-seed weight, true density and seed yield per plant. These traits are governed by additive gene action and therefore, may be improved through direct selection. These results are accordance with the earlier finding of Adlan (2019) in mungbean, Get et al., (2019) in lentil, Pal et al., (2020) and Meena et al., (2021) in mothbean.      

Table 4: Genetic variability parameters of mungbean genotypes for seed characteristics.

 
       
The traits namely; 100-seed weight, true density, porosity, water absorption capacity and water absorption index had significantly positive correlation with seed yield per plant (Table 5). Positive direct effect on seed yield per plant was observed for water absorption index and 100-seed weight at both phenotypic and genotypic levels; whereas, true density at phenotypic level and porosity and bulk density at genotypic level (Table 6). The residual effect was found high for seed traits at both phenotypic and genotypic levels which indicate that seed traits were also contributed to seed yield but major contribution came from other traits like agro-morphological and physio-biochemical traits (Fig 1). These findings are in accordance as reported by Adlan (2019) in mungbean, Pal et al., (2020) and Meena et al., (2021) in mothbean.

Table 5: Estimates of phenotypic and genotypic correlation coefficient of mungbean genotypes on seed yield for seed characteristics.



Table 6: Estimates of phenotypic and genotypic path coefficient of mungbean genotypes on seed yield for seed characteristics



Fig 1: Phenotypic path diagram of seed traits for seed yield in mungbean.

Highly significant differences were found among all genotypes for all seed traits studied. The high degree of genetic variability along with high heritability and high genetic advance as per cent of mean were observed for water absorption capacity, water absorption index and porosity which reveals that these characters were under the control of additive gene action and therefore, form the basis of selection for mungbean improvement programme. Among seed traits, water absorption index and 100-seed weight had positive correlation with seed yield and directly contributed towards seed yield which can help in the improvement of seed yield in mungbean.
The present study was supported by Prof. (Dr.) N.K. Sharma, SKRAU, Bikaner; for the best guidance and support. I am also extremely grateful to Dr. Om Veer Singh, Principal Scientist and Officer-In-Charge, NBPGR, RS, Jodhpur; Prof. (Dr.) B.R. Chaudhary, Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor, Agriculture University, Jodhpur; Prof. (Dr.) O.P. Khedar, O/I, MULLaRP, RARI, Durgapura, Jaipur and Prof. (Dr.) Vijay Prakash, ARS, Sriganganagar for providing valuable research material for my Ph.D. research experimentation.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Adlan, P. (2019). Morpho-physiological studies in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Thesis, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner (Rajasthan). pp 123.

  2. Azam, M., Hossain, M., Alam, M., Rahman, K., Hossain, M. (2018). Genetic variability, heritability and correlation path analysis in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research. 43(3): 407-416.

  3. Baraki, F., Gebregergis, Z., Belay, Y., Berhe, M. and Zibelo, H. (2020). Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability analysis of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) genotypes in Northern Ethiopia. Cogent Food and Agriculture. 6(1): 1729581-1729595.

  4. Burton, G.W. and Devane, E.M. (1953). Estimation of heritability in tall fescus (Festuca arundinacea) from replicated clonal material. Agronomy Journal. 45: 478-480.

  5. Comstock, R.R. and Robinson, H.F. (1952). Genetic parameters, their estimation and significance. Proceeding of Sixth International Grassland Congress. 1: 248-251. 

  6. Dewey, D.R. and Lu, H.K. (1959). A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agronomy Journal. 51(6): 515-518.

  7. Directorate of Pulses Development, (2022). Annual Report 2021- 22. Retrieved from https://dpd.gov.in/Annual Report (2021-22).pdf.

  8. Get, S., Gothwal, D.K., Choudhary, R.C. and Shekhawat, K. (2019). Genetic variability in lentil (Lens culinaris M.) genotypes for seed and seedling characteristics. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 8(3): 3000-3004. 

  9. Gogoi, L.R., Behera, P.P., Borah, N. and Sarma, R.N. (2024). Genetic Variability and Correlation Studies for Yield and Yield Attributing Traits in Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Legume Research. doi: 10.18805/LR-5241.

  10. Gupta, R.K. and Das, S.K. (1997). Physical properties of sunflower seeds. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 66: 1-8. 

  11. ICARDA. (2005). ICARDA Annual Report 2004. International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Aleppo, Syria. 121pp.

  12. Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.F. and Comstock, R.E. (1955). Estimate of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agronomy Journal. 47: 314-318.

  13. Kumar, A., Sharma, N.K., Anita, Shekhawat, K., Kumawat, S. (2024). Stability Analysis for Agro-morphological and Physio- biochemical Traits in Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilzeck] under Arid Environment. Legume Research. 47(5): 723- 730.

  14. Anita, Kumhar, A., S.R., Kumar, S.R., A., Suchitra, A., Kulheri A., Shekhawat P.K. and Yadav G.L. (2022). Correlation and path analysis for pod yield and its component traits in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilzeck] genotypes. Legume Research. doi:10.18805/LR-4906. https://arccjo urna ls. com/journal/legume-research-an-international-journal/ LR-4906.  

  15. Meena S., Sharma N.K., Sharma A.K., Kumar R., Gaur G.K. (2021). Study of genetic variability parameters for seed yield and component traits in mothbean [Vigna aconitifolia (Jacq) Marechal] under arid environment. Biological Forum. 13(3a): 180-183. 

  16. Mohsenin, N.N. (1986). Physical Properties of Plants and Animal Materials: Structure, physical characteristics and mechanical properties. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York. pp. 881.

  17. Pal, S., Sharma, N.K., Sharma, A.K., Kumar, A. and Meena, S. (2020). Study of genetic variability parameters for seed yield and component traits in moth bean [Vigna aconitifolia (jacq) Marechal]. International Journal of Chemical Studies.  8(4): 2638-2641.  

  18. Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1985). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers, ICAR, New Delhi. pp. 357. 

  19. Peleg, K. (1985). Produce Handling, Packaging and Distribution. The AVI Publishing Company Inc., Westport, Connecticut (USA).  pp. 625. 

  20. Rahmianna, A.A., Basuki, T., Kote, M., Seran, Y.L. and Rachaputi, R.C. (2021). Increasing productivity of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] under subsistence farming in Eastern Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 911(1): 012029. doi: 10.1088/17 55-1315/911/1/012029.

  21. Samyuktha, S.M., Malarvizhi, D., Karthikeyan, A., Dhasarathan, M., Hemavathy, A.T., Vanniarajan, C., Sheela, V., Hepziba, S.J., Pandiyan, M. and Senthil, N. (2020). Delineation of genotype x environment interaction for identification of stable genotypes to grain yield in mungbean. Frontiers in Agronomy. 2: 577911-577921.

  22. Shepherd, H., Bhardwaj, R.K. (1986). Moisture dependent physical properties of pigeon pea. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 35: 227-234.

  23. Singh, C., Singh, P. and Singh, R. (2015). Modern Techniques of Raising Field Crops. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. pp. 386.

  24. Singh, K.K. and Goswami, T.K. (1996). Some physical properties of cumin seed [Cuminum cyminum L.]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research.  64(1): 93-98.

  25. Sneha, M., Saravanan, S., Premkumari, S. M. and Pillai, M.A. (2020). An appraisal of genetic divergence in some indigenous collections of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wileczek]. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 11(2): 620-625.

  26. Williamsa, P.C., Nakoul, H. and Singh, K.B. (1983). Relationship between cooking time and some physical characteristics in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 34: 492-496.

Editorial Board

View all (0)