Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 59 issue 1 (january 2025) : 38-43

Application of Sulphur and Foliar Zinc at Different Growth Stages to Boost the Quality and Yield of Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus L.) under Central Plain Region of Punjab, India

Rohit Saral1, Mayur Darvhankar1,*, Rajesh Kumar1, Govind Kumar Yadav2
1Department of Agronomy, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara-144 402, Punjab, India.
2Office of Joint Director Agriculture Extension, Z.P. Sikar-332 001, Rajasthan, India.
Cite article:- Saral Rohit, Darvhankar Mayur, Kumar Rajesh, Yadav Kumar Govind (2025). Application of Sulphur and Foliar Zinc at Different Growth Stages to Boost the Quality and Yield of Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus L.) under Central Plain Region of Punjab, India . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 59(1): 38-43. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-6327.

Background: A key element for the growth of oilseed crops is sulphur. It is required for the synthesis of vitamins, oilsand proteins. Compared to the organic form, inorganic sulphur is less common in agricultural soils. Zinc contributes significantly to the regulatory cofactors of many enzymes and proteins in many biochemical processes, which can aid in the oilseed crop’s high production. By 2025, there will be a 63% increase in Zn deficiency, up from 42% in 1970. 

Methods: A field experiment was conducted for two years (2022-2023 and 2023–2024) at Agronomy Research Field, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India, which comprises four zinc application (Dose @ 1.5 ml L-1) treatments viz., Z0-Control, Z1-1 appl. (one spray @ 15 DAS), Z2-2 appl. (two spray @ 15+45 DAS) and  Z3-3 appl. (three spray @ 15+45+75 DAS)and four sulphur application treatments viz., S0-Control, S1 (10 kg ha-1), S2 (20 kg ha-1) and S3 (30 kg ha-1). 

Result: The seed yield, stover yield, biological yield, harvest index, oil content and oil yield of gobhi sarson were studied. The application of zinc and sulphur had significant effect on seed yield, stover yield, biological yield, oil content and oil yield. The maximum seed yield (2752 kg ha-1), stover yield (6841 kg ha-1), biological yield (9593 kg ha-1), oil yield (1112.40 kg ha-1) recorded under Z3-3 appl. (three spray @ 15+45+75 DAS) + S3 (30 kg ha-1) in comparison to other treatments. Application of sulphur 30 kg ha-1 recorded highest oil content and oil yield (40.25%, 962.32 kg ha-1) in comparison to S2-20 kg ha-1 (40.09%, 921.25 kg ha-1), S1-10 kg ha-1 (38.18%, 802.17 kg ha-1), S0-Control (36.21%, 689.17 kg ha-1.

Oilseeds hold a distinguished position in Indian agriculture as a result of their critical contribution to the nation’s sustainable economy. Edible vegetable oil is important for human nutrition. Edible oil, which has high energy content, is crucial for supplying humans with the calories they need. One of the most significant winter oil seed crops is Indian mustard. Due to a lack of accurate knowledge on its nutritional needs, mustard output is not effectively utilised. With a yield of 9.12 MT and an average productivity of 1586 kg/ha, Indian rapeseed and mustard grow on an area of around 7.2 million hectares (Anonymous, 2020).

An important nutrient for the growth of oilseeds is sulphur. With an average concentration of 0.06 percent, it ranks as the 13th most prevalent element in the crust of the planet. After nitrogen, phosphorusand potassium, sulphur (S) is becoming more widely acknowledged as the fourth main plant nutrient (Jamal et al., 2010). Depending on the crop, soiland environmental conditions, a hectare of oilseeds may remove 10 to 25 kg of sulphur annually, whereas a hectare of legumes can remove 5 to 10 kg. (Singh and Singh, 2016). According to Singh (2001), almost 41% of soils in India have a sulphur deficiency. Rapeseed is more susceptible to sulphur deficit than other crops like cereals or legumes because of its high sulphur need (Zhao et al., 1997). The visual symptoms of sulphur deficiency in cruciferous crops are very specific and can be treated in the field throughout the growing season (Pierre et al., 1999). During flowering, the characteristic changes in sulphur deficiency in the color and shape of the petals (Haneklaus et al., 1999).

A lack of sulphur causes a build-up of amino acids, which is expected to control how well nitrogen is absorbed and assimilated. In contrast, activities that boosts the regeneration of organic sulphur result in compounds that act as defences against stress and as solutions. A severe sulphur deficit can eventually result in slower development, which is notably linked to a slower rate of epidemic spread (Hawkesford and De Kok, 2006). According to De Pascale et al., (2008), sulphur deprivation also causes a 40% decrease in the quantity and quality of rapeseed or oilseeds.

For plants to thrive at their best, a N:S ratio of around 20:1 is necessary (Cram, 1990). When sulphur is insufficient, accumulation of non-protein substances such amides happens, increasing the N:S ratio. In addition, sulphate builds accumulated in plant tissues when the supply of S exceeds that needed for protein synthesis (Reneau et al., 1986). This results in a reduced N:S ratio. The N:S ratio determines whether proteins are available or lacking in S. According to Spencer and Freney 1980, the N and S ratio is typically used as a diagnostic standard for S deficit. The N:S ratio can be found in tissues at a variety of various concentration levels, Schnug and Hanklaus 2000 noted, making its use as a diagnostic criteria less than ideal. Due to the ongoing loss of soil fertility, Zn deficiency in Indian soils is predicted to rise from 42 per cent in 1970 to 63 percent by 2025 (Singh, 2011). According to Jena et al., (2008), the zinc deficit in alluvial soils varied from 7.0 to 76.0 percent, 2 to 12 per cent in lateriteand 42 per cent in black soils. Black, mixed black and redand alluvial soils tend to be more zinc deficient than other soil types, according to (Sahu and Mitra, 1992). Zn deficit is due to Zn precipitating as hydroxide, carbonate and sulphide and to its adsorption on newly produced oxides of Fe with the highest surface area. Increased clay and silt concentration reduced the Zn-supplying ability of rice soils (Pal et al., 2021). Studies have shown that sulphur and zinc fertilization significantly improve soybean growth and yield attributes. Specifically, the application of both nutrients enhanced plant height, pod number, seed yieldand stover yield (Imsong et al., 2023). In acidic Alfisols and Inceptisols, phosphorus levels up to 120 mg P kg-1 significantly enhanced rapeseed yield and phosphorus uptake, with single super phosphate performing better than Mussoorie rock phosphate (Maurya et al., 2023).

In India, rainfed conditions are mostly used for oilseed crop cultivation. Because oilseed crops are grown in soils with marginal to poor fertility, their average productivity is low. The availability of Zn is poor in more than 30% of agricultural soils worldwide, which reduces crop yields and productivity (Alloway, 2009). Malnutrition is thus brought on among those lacking in resources (Singh, 2011). In order to fulfil the rising demand for oilseeds, average production levels must rise from the current 1292 kg/ha to 1450 kg ha-1 by 2025.

In India, oilseed crops account for 5.98% of the value of all agricultural products and about 3% of the country’s GDP. According to Varaprasad et al., (2011), India accounts for 12 to 15 per cent of the world’s oilseed area, 6-7 per cent of vegetable oil production, 9 to 10 per cent of all edible oil consumptionand 13.6 per cent of vegetable oil imports. Generally seven edible oilseed crops, viz., groundnut (Arachis hypogaea), mustard (Brassica juncea L.), soyabean (Glycine max), sunflower (Helianthus annus), safflower (Carthamus tinctorius), sesame (Seasamum indicum) and niger (Guizotia abyssinica) and two non-edible oilseed crops, viz. Castor (Ricinus communis) and linseed (Linum usitatissimum) are grown. Organic manures, such as vermicompost and pressmud, improved the seed quality, including oil and protein content. Overall, the integration of foliar sulphur with organic and inorganic fertilizers improved both the yield and quality of canola, offering a sustainable approach for better production and soil health (Singh et al., 2020).

The productivity of oilseed is much lower than the global average (1.9 t ha-1) and that of emerging nations (2.5 - 3.0 t ha-1). Low productivity is mostly caused by improper or uneven fertiliser use, farming on marginal soilsand rainfed conditions (Tripathi et al., 2010). Therefore, there is a significant disparity between the demand for and production of mustard in our nation, or low productivity may be caused by oilseed crops continuously depleting the soil of its nutrients (Sudhakara and Hegde, 2011; Pant et al., 2022). Therefore, improving sulphur and zinc utilisation and managing soil-crop-sulphur-zinc fertilisation are urgently needed to boost mustard crop yield. The goal of the current study was to determine the effects of zinc and sulphur nutrition on yield and quality of gobhi sarson.
The study was carried out for a period of two years at the Research Farm, Lovely Professional Universityand Phagwara, Punjab, India (31°14'35.2"N latitude and 75°41'48.2"E longitude). The experiment location is in a semi-arid, subtropical climate zone. Summer temperatures ranged from 24 to 46.5°C and winter temperatures varied from 3.6 to 26°C. The majority of the yearly rainfall is anticipated during the monsoon season (July to September)and ranges from 500 to 800 mm on average. In the soil, the water is around 90-100 m below the surface. The soil composition of the region classified as Central alluvial plain or sandy loam, the soil surface, 0-15 cm, had a pH (7.65), EC (0.45 dS m-1), medium SOC (0.57%)and also low status of available N, P2O5, K2O, S and Zn (185.7, 24.9, 198.5 kg ha-1, 8.50 and 0.46 mg kg-1 respectively), for initial soil samples in October 2022.

The experiment was conducted with two factor zinc spray (through zinc oxide 39.5% Zn, 1.5 ml L-1) and sulphur (through bentonite sulphur 90%) soil application comprised of Z0-Control, Z1-1 appl. (one spray @ 15 DAS), Z2-2 appl. (two spray @ 15 + 45 DAS) and  Z3-3 appl. (three spray @ 15 + 45 + 75 DAS) and four sulphur application treatments viz., S0-Control, S1 (10 kg ha-1), S2 (20 kg ha-1) and S3 (30 kg ha-1), were tested in factorial randomized block design replicated 3 timesand recommended dose of fertilizer N, P2O5, K2O (40:12:40) was applied and test variety was GSC-7. For determination of oil content (%) in the seed, determined by using a Soxhlet apparatus (AOAC, 2005). The oil yield determined by multiplying the seed yield with the appropriate oil content using mathematical calculation. Regularly biometric observations were recorded at specific time intervals by selecting randomly five plants in each treatment. Finally, the crop was harvested and produce was dried, threshed, cleaned and weighed. The yield data were subjected to statistical analysis.

Data presented in tables were two-year pooled data; the results were similar for both years and pooled data provided the best representation of the observed results. Utilizing window-based statistical software, SPSS version 16.0 using zinc application and sulphur application as factors (SPSS 2018). The data for yield and quality of gobhi sarson were analyzed using a factorial randomized block design (FRBD) with Duncan’s multiple range test at a 5% level of significance for comparing the means.
Seed yield, stover yield, biological yield and harvest index
 
The application of zinc and sulphur had significant effect of seed yield, stover yield and biological yield (Table 1). The seed yield treatments with zinc application ranges from 2425 to 1800 kg ha-1, The Z0-control treatment had the lowest seed yield, whereas the maximum (2425 kg ha-1) was recorded under Z3-3 appl. (three spray @ 15 + 45 + 75 DAS). The application of sulphur 30 kg ha-1 (2390 kg ha-1) recorded maximum seed yield. The interactive effect of zinc and sulphur application on seed yield was found significant. The maximum seed yield (2752 kg ha-1) under Z3-3 appl. (three spray @ 15 + 45 + 75 DAS) + S3 (30 kg ha-1) followed by (2647 kg ha-1) Z2-2 appl. (two spray @ 15 + 45 DAS) + S3 (30 kg ha-1).

Table 1: Response of zinc application and sulphur levels on seed yield, stover yield, biological yield and harvest index of Gobhi sarson.



The application of zinc and sulphur significantly altered stover yield of gobhi sarson (Table 1). The maximum stover yield (5873 kg ha-1) under Z3-3 appl. (three spray @ 15 + 45 + 75 DAS) followed by Z2-2 appl. (two spray @ 15 + 45 DAS) and lowest under Z0-Control (4556 kg ha-1). The stover yield in the treatments of sulphur application, in decreasing order, was as follows: S3-30 kg ha-1 (6065 kg ha-1), S2-20 kg ha-1 (5621 kg ha-1), S1-10 kg ha-1 (5107 kg ha-1) and lest in S0-Control (4580 kg ha-1). The interactive effect of zinc and sulphur application on stover was found significant. The maximum stover yield (6841 kg ha-1) under Z3-3 appl. (three spray @ 15 + 45 + 75 DAS) + S3 (30 kg ha-1) followed (6597 kg ha-1) by Z2-2 appl. (two spray @ 15 + 45 DAS) + S3 (30 kg ha-1) and lowest under (4161 kg ha-1) Z0-Control + S0-Control.

Similar to seed yield and stover yield, various zinc and sulphur application treatments had a significant effect on the biological yield of gobhi sarson (Table 1), the interactive effect of zinc and sulphur was also found significant. The maximum biological yield (9593 kg ha-1) under Z3-3 appl. (three spray @ 15 + 45 + 75 DAS) + S3 (30 kg ha-1) followed (9244 kg ha-1) by Z2-2 appl. (two spray @ 15 + 45 DAS) + S3 (30 kg ha-1) and lowest under (5817 kg ha-1) Z0-Control + S0-Control. The application of zinc and sulphur had non-significant effect on harvest index.
 
Oil content and oil yield
 
Different zinc and sulphur application treatments had considerable effect on oil content and oil yield (Table 2). The maximum oil content and oil yield was recorded (38.85%, 946.36 kg ha-1) under Z3-3 appl. (three spray @ 15 + 45 + 75 DAS) followed by Z2-2 appl. (two spray @ 15 + 45 DAS) (38.15%, 919.32 kg ha-1), Z1-1 appl. (one spray @ 15 DAS) (37.24%, 816.32 kg ha-1) and least under Z0-Control (36.40%, 692.71 kg ha-1), respectively. Application of sulphur 30 kg ha-1 recorded highest oil content and oil yield (40.25%, 962.32 kg ha-1) in comparison to S2-20 kg ha-1 (40.09%, 921.25 kg ha-1), S1-10 kg ha-1 (38.18%, 802.17 kg ha-1), S0-Control (36.21%, 689.17 kg ha-1).

Table 2: Response of zinc application and sulphur levels on oil content and oil yield of Gobhi sarson.



The graphical representation showed that, application of zinc and sulphur had significant interactive effect on oil yield (Fig 1). The highest oil yield (1112.40 kg ha-1) under Z3-3 appl. (three spray @ 15 + 45 + 75 DAS) + S3 (30 kg ha-1) followed (1068.50 kg ha-1) by Z2-2 appl. (two spray @ 15 + 45 DAS) + S3 (30 kg ha-1) and lowest under (595.25 kg ha-1) Z0-Control + S0-Control.

Fig 1: Interactive effect of zinc and sulphur application on oil yield of gobhi sarson.



Applications of sulphur and other nutrients greatly enhanced the oil content (15- 30 per cent) in oilseed crops as groundnut, rapeseed–mustard, etc. (Ahmad et al., 1999). Sulphur application accelerates the plant’s process of synthesising proteins (Ahmad and Abdin 2000). Through sulphur nutrition, the composition of oil, acetyl-CoAand acetyl-CoA carboxylase in oilseeds is also impacted. The amount of various fatty acids in a particular oilseed impacts its application; for example, linseed oil with a high linolenic acid content is advantageous for the high-quality production of paints and other products. In addition to this, sulphur administration speeds up the production of linolenic acid and causes less stearic, oleicand linoleic acid to be produced (Ahmad et al., 2006; Pant et al., 2022).

This resulted from sufficient S availability, as S is a structural element of glucosinolate, the enzyme glycosidase (Thompson et al., 1986), a component of acetyl-CoA carboxylaseand glycerol, which are all involved in mustard’s increased synthesis of fatty acids and oils (Fazli et al., 2005; Pant et al., 2022). The oil content was significantly impacted by foliar spraying zinc and B as well as varying soil levels. This could be because applying zinc to mustard crops increases the amount of assimilate that seeds receive, which in turn increases the amount of fat synthesis and oil content. Activation of multiple enzymes, including cysteine desulphydrase, NADPH dehydrogenase, glycyl-glycine dipeptidaseand dihydropeptodase, may also be the cause (Iweive and Weiner, 1972; Havlin et al., 2013; Pant et al., 2022).
 
Seed yield, stover yield, biological yield and harvest index
 
Sulphur is essential for the production of cysteine, methionine, chlorophyll, vitamins (B, biotinand thiamine), as well as for the metabolism of carbohydrates, oilsand proteins. It is also linked to growth and metabolism, particularly for its impact on protolytic enzymes (Najar et al., 2011; Pant et al., 2022; Ahmad et al., 1999; Ahmad et al., 2006). Additionally, increased protein synthesis, glucose metabolismand photosynthate translocation with S administration are to blame (Thompson et al., 1989).

Alloway (2008) states that while B assisted in the development of reproductive structures and the translocation of photosynthates toward sinks, Zn fertilization increased the activity of several enzymes involved in photosynthesis, CO2 assimilation, starch formationand protein synthesis (Shireen et al., 2018). According to Singh et al., (2010), there was a discernible increase in 1000-seed weight, seed productionand stover output of up to 30 kg S ha-1. Application of 40 kg S ha-1 resulted in considerably better seed and stover production, according to Dubey et al., (2013). It might be the result of the crop’s increased capacity for photosynthetic respiration after applying S, which aided in the production of chlorophyll, protein synthesisand effective nitrogen utilization. This could account for the mustard crop’s increased plant growth and dry matter accumulation (Thompson et al., 1989; Ahmad and Abdin 2000).
 
Oil content and oil yield
 
This resulted from sufficient S availability, as S is a structural element of glucosinolate, the enzyme glycosidase (Thompson et al., 1986), a component of acetyl-CoA carboxylaseand glycerol, which are all involved in mustard’s increased synthesis of fatty acids and oils (Fazli et al., 2005; Pant et al., 2022). The oil content was significantly impacted by foliar spraying zinc and B as well as varying soil levels. This could be because applying zinc to mustard crops increases the amount of assimilate that seeds receive, which in turn increases the amount of fat synthesis and oil content. Activation of multiple enzymes, including cysteine desulphydrase, NADPH dehydrogenase, glycyl-glycine dipeptidaseand dihydropeptodase, may also be the cause (Iweive and Weiner, 1972; Havlin et al., 2013; Pant et al., 2022).
Oilseed production in India continues to be poor as a result of a significant propagation deficit and low S and Zn fertiliser usage. The findings of soil tests can be utilised to create nutrient maps for zinc and sulphur for balanced management in a farmer’s field. The maximum seed yield (2752 kg ha-1), stover yield (6841 kg ha-1), biological yield (9593 kg ha-1), oil yield (1112.40 kg ha-1) recorded under Z3-3 appl. (three spray @ 15 + 45 + 75 DAS) + S3 (30 kg ha-1) in comparison to other treatments. Application of sulphur 30 kg ha-1 recorded highest oil content and oil yield (40.25%, 962.32 kg ha-1) in comparison to S2-20 kg ha-1 (40.09%, 921.25 kg ha-1), S1-10 kg ha-1 (38.18%, 802.17 kg ha-1), S0-Control (36.21%, 689.17 kg ha-1.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

  1. Ahmad, A. and Abdin, M.Z. (2000). Effect of sulphur application on lipid, RNA, protein content and fatty acid composition in developing seeds of rapeseed (B. campestris). Plant Sci. 150: 71-75.

  2. Ahmad, A., Abraham, G. and Abdin, M.Z. (1999). Physiological investigation on the impact of nitrogen and sulphur application on seed and oil yield of rapeseed (B.campestris L.) and mustard (B. juncea) genotypes. J. Agro. Crop. Sci. 183: 10- 25.

  3. Ahmad, A., Khan, I. and Abdin, M.Z. (2006). Effect of sulphur fertilization on lipid accumulation, acetyl-CoA and acetyl- CoA carboxylase in the developing seeds of rapeseed (B. campestris L). Australian J. Agri. Res. 51: 1023- 1029.

  4. Alloway, B.J. (2008) Zinc in soils and crop nutrition. Second edition. Brussels, Belgium: IZA; and Paris, France: IFA. 135 pp.

  5. Alloway, B.J. (2009). Soil factors associated with zinc deficiency in crops and humans. Environ Geochem Health. 31: 537- 548 

  6. Anonymous, (2020). World Agricultural Production. United States, Department of Agriculture. Foreign Agricultural Service.

  7. AOAC  (2005). Official Method of Analysis, Method 945.16, Oil in Cereal Adjuncts. 18th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.

  8. Cram, W.J. (1990). Uptake and Transport of Sulphate. In: Sulphur Nutrition and Sulphur Assimilation in Higher Plants. [Renennberg, H., Brunold, C., De Kok, L.J. and Stulen, I. (eds)], SPB Academic Publishers, The Hague. pp 3-11.

  9. De pascale, S., Maggio, A., Orsini, F., Bottino, A. and Barbieri, G. (2008). Sulphur fertilisation affects yield and quality in friarielli (B. rapa) grown on a floating system. J. Horti. Sci. Biotech. 83: 743-748.

  10. Dubey, S.K., Tripathi, S.K. and Singh, B. (2013) Effect of sulphur and zinc levels on growth, yield and quality of mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) czern. and coss.]. Research and Reviews: Journal of Crop Science and Technology. 2(1): 1-10.

  11. Fazli, I.S., Abdin, M.Z., Jamal, A. and Ahmad, S. (2005) Interactive effect of sulphur and nitrogen on lipid accumulation, acetyl-CoA concentration and acetyl-CoA carboxylase activity in developing seeds of oilseed crops (Brassica campestris L. and Eruca sativa Mill). Plant Science. 168: 29-36.

  12. Fismes, J., Vong, P.C., Guckert, A. and Frossard, E. (2000). Influence of sulphur on apparent N-use efficiency, yield and quality of oilseed rape (B. napus) grown on a calcareous soil. European J. Agro. 12: 127- 141.

  13. Haneklaus, S., Paulsen, H.M. and Gupta, A.K. (1999). Influence of sulphur fertilization on yield and quality of oilseed rape and mustard. In: New Horizons for an old Crop. Proc of 10th International Rapeseed Congress. Australia Capital Territory, Australia.

  14. Havlin, J.L., Tisdale, S.L., Nelson, W.L. and  Beaton. J.D. (2013) Soil fertility and fertilizers: An Introduction to Nutrient Management (Eighth Edition). Pearson India Education Services Pvt. Ltd.

  15. Hawkesford, M.J. and De Kok, L.J. (2006). Managing sulphur metabolism in plants. Plant and Cell Envir. 29: 82-395.

  16. Imsong, W., Tzudir, L., Longkumer, L.T., Gohain, T., Kawikhonliu, Z. (2023). Effect of sulphur and zinc fertilization on growth and yield of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] under Nagaland Condition . Agricultural Science Digest. 43(5): 637-642. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5758.

  17. Iweive, I. and Weiner, H. (1972) Effect of iron and zinc application on yield, oil content and their uptake by sesame. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 38: 171-173.

  18. Jamal, A., Yong, S.M. and Abdin, M.Z. (2010). Sulphur-a general overview and interaction with nitrogen. Australian J. Crop Sci. 4: 523-52.

  19. Jena, D., Singh, MV., Pattnaik, M.R. and Nayak, S.C. (2008). Tec. Bull. 1. AICRP on Micro and Secondary nutrient and Pollutant elements in soil and plant, OUAT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha.

  20. Maurya, A., Sanjay, S. (2023). Yield and nutrient uptake of rapeseed (Brassica campestris var. toria) as influenced by phosphorus sources and levels in acidic soils of Meghalaya . Agricultural Science Digest. 43(1): 46-50. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5420.

  21. Najar, G.R., Singh, S.R., Akthar, F. and Hakeem, S.A. (2011). Influence of sulphur levels on yield, uptake and quality of soybean (Glycine max) under temperate conditions of Kashmir valley. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 81: 340-343.

  22. Pal, A.K., Nayak, B.K. and Shukla, A.K. (2021). Zinc use and management of oilseed crops: An overall review. Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett. 10 (37): 69-80.

  23. Pant, C., Pachauri, S., Srivastava, A., Singh, V. and Shukla, A., (2022). Residual effect of varying levels of sulphur, zinc and boron on yield, yield attributing characters, nutrient uptake and quality in mustard (Brassica juncea L.) grown after cluster bean in a Mollisol. Annals of Plant and Soil Research. 24(4): 636-645.

  24. Pierre, J., Mesquida, J., Marilleau, R., Pham-del Delegue, M.H. and Renard, M.. (1999). Nectar secretion in winter oilseed rape, Brassica napus-Quantitative and qualitative variability among 71 genotypes. Journal Plant Breed. 118: 471- 476.

  25. Reneau, R.B., Brann, D.E. and Donohue, S.J. (1986). Effect of sulfur on winter wheat grown in the coastal plain of Virginia. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 17(2): 149-158. 

  26. Sahu, S.K. and Mitra, G.N. (1992). Proceeding of workshop on Micronutrient, IBEP, HFC, Bhubaneswar. p. 84.

  27. Schnug, E. and Hankelaus, S. (2000). Significance of Interactions between Sulfur and Nitrogen Supply for Growth and quality of crop plants. In: Sulfur Nutrition and Sulfur Assimilation in Higher Plants: Molecular, Biochemical and Physiological Aspects, [Brunold, C., Rennenberg, H., De Kok, L.J., Stulen, I. and Davidian, J.C. (eds)], Paul Haupt, Bern.  345-347.

  28. Shireen, F., Nawaz, M. A., Chen, C., Zhang, Q., Zheng, Z., Sohail, H., Sun, Jingyu, S., Cao, H., Huang, Y. and Bie, Z. (2018). Boron: Functions and approaches to enhance its availability in plants for sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Molecular Science. 19: 1856.

  29. Singh, L., Sharma, R., Singh, N. (2020). Effect of foliar application of sulphur and integrated nutrient management on yield, quality and economics of bed transplanted canola (Brassica napus L.) . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 55(2): 192-196. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5436.

  30. Singh, M.V. (2001). Importance of sulphur in balanced fertilizer use in India. Ferti. News. 46: 55- 58.

  31. Singh, M.V. (2011). Scenario of zinc deficiency in Indian soils and its influence on zinc enrichment in crops for improving human and animal health. Presented at 3rd International zinc symposium, Improving crop production and Human health, Hydrabad, India. Oct 10-14.

  32. Singh, S. and Singh, S.K. (2016). Use of indigenous sources of sulphur in soils of eastern India for higher crops yield and quality. Agric. Reviews. 37: 117-124. doi: 10.18805/ ar.v0iof.9626.

  33. Singh, Y., Singh, T., Singh, U.N. and Rajput, P.K. (2010). Effect of nutrient management on yield, quality and economics of irrigated Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 80(8): 691-694.

  34. Spencer, K. and Freney, J.R. (1980). Assessing the sulfur status of field grown wheat by plant analysis 1. Agronomy Journal. 72(3): 469-472.

  35. Sudhakara Babu, S.N. and Hegde, D.M. (2011). Best management practices for increasing productivity and resource use efficiency in oilseeds. J. oilseed Res. 28(1): 19-23.

  36. Thompson, L. M. L. (1989). An investigation into the mode of action and selectivity of three 3, 6-dichloropicolinic acid  (Doctoral dissertation, Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom).

  37. Tripathi, MK., Chaturvedi, S., Shukla, D.K .and Mahapatra, B.S. (2010). Yield performance and quality in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) as affected by INM. Ind. J. Agronomy. 55: 138-142.

  38. Varaprasad, K.S., Sujatha, M., Sudhakara Babu, SN., Ramana Rao, SV., Vimala Devi, P.S. and Pati, D. (2011). Vision 2030: Directorate of Oilseed Research, Hydrabad, India. p. 26.

  39. Zhao, F.J, Bilsborrow, P.E., Evans, E.J. and Mcgrath, S.P. (1997). Nitrogen to sulphur ratio in rapeseed and in rapeseed protein and its use in diagnosing sulphur deficiency. J. Plant Nutri. 20: 549- 558.

Editorial Board

View all (0)