Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 58 issue 2 (april 2024) : 202-208

Survey of Rice Genotypes of Southern India for Seed Zinc Concentration to Explore its Seed Endophytic Microbial Diversity

Yama Santhoshi Lavanya1,*, Dhandapani Murugesan2, Anandham Rangaswamy1, Kenas Vijila1,*
1Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Rice Research Institute, Aduthurai-612 101, Tamil Nadu, India.
Cite article:- Lavanya Santhoshi Yama, Murugesan Dhandapani, Rangaswamy Anandham, Vijila Kenas (2024). Survey of Rice Genotypes of Southern India for Seed Zinc Concentration to Explore its Seed Endophytic Microbial Diversity . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 58(2): 202-208. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-6193.

Background: Rice is a vital staple food for a large part of the global population and zinc deficiency poses health risks, particularly in rice-dependent regions. Studying genotypic differences in rice seed zinc content is vital for breeding zinc enriched varieties to address malnutrition and enhance food security. In the plant microbe partnership exploring the role of seed bacterial endophytes in influencing the plant physiology holds promise for Zn accumulation contributing to the broader goals of enhancing food quality, nutrition and crop production in a world facing increasing agricultural demands and challenges.

Methods: Rice genotypes were surveyed and their seed zinc content was analysed using non-destructive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Surface sterilization of rice seed samples was performed to isolate endophytic bacteria, involving a series of treatments with distilled water, ethanol and sodium hypochlorite to remove surface microflora. The sterilized seeds were then macerated and diluted to obtain a countable number of colonies, which were subsequently spread-plated on nutrient agar, tryptic soy agar and soil extract agar to enumerate the different nutritional types of seed endophytic microflora.

Result: In this study, 34 different rice genotypes, comprising traditional landraces and modern cultivars, were collected and analysed for their inherent zinc content. One variety in each category of low, medium and high seed Zn content was selected. The occurrence of all nutritional types of bacterial and their population was highest in the genotype Karuppunel followed by CO51 and ADT 39. Nutrient agar was found to promote a higher count of culturable bacterial endophytes compared to Tryptic soy agar and Soil extract agar.

Three million people around the world rely heavily on rice as a significant food source, about 20% of their calorie intake. In Asia, nearly two billion individuals depend on rice for their daily calories, accounting for 60-70% of their diet and plays a pivotal role in addressing global food security (Maganti et al., 2020). However, the nutritional quality of rice, particularly its zinc (Zn) content, has gained significant attention in recent years due to its link with malnutrition. Zinc deficiency affects a substantial portion of the global population, particularly in regions where rice serves as a dietary staple. The Zn content of rice seed varies significantly among different rice genotypes, presenting an opportunity to address this nutritional concern through genetic diversity and breeding programs.
       
Plant seeds harbour a variety of microorganisms that play a vital role in maintaining the well-being of both seeds and the resulting plants (Grum et al., 1998; Gitaitis and Walcott, 2007). Endophytes refer to bacteria that reside within plants without causing any visible signs of disease (Luo et al., 2011). They can establish mutually beneficial partnerships with plants, thereby enhancing the plants’ ability to withstand both biological and environmental challenges (Afzal et al., 2019; Santoyo et al., 2016). Additionally, endophytes can support the growth of their host plants through various mechanisms, such as improving nutrient acquisition, increasing chlorophyll levels and boosting resistance to oxidation and defence capabilities (Rashid et al., 2012; Li et al., 2019).
       
Microbial communities and endophytes found within seeds are of significant importance due to their ability to be passed down from one generation of plants to the next. As they are transmitted via seeds, these endophytes guarantee their presence in the succeeding plants, ensuring their continuity (Truyens et al., 2015). Seed microbiomes exhibit a wide range of interactions and are anticipated to be a valuable biological asset for the promotion of sustainable agricultural practices (Barret et al., 2015 and Lugtenberg et al., 2016). Moreover, emerging research has shed light on the role of seed microflora, particularly endophytic bacterial populations, in influencing plant health (Gaiero et al., 2013) and nutrient uptake (Bajaj et al., 2018), further underscoring the complex interactions between the plant and its microbial partners. This is achieved through a variety of direct and indirect mechanisms, even in the face of various biotic and abiotic stress conditions, as evidenced by research (Santoyo et al., 2016; Shahzad et al., 2017; Rodrìýguez et al., 2018 and Shearin et al., 2018).
       
In this article, we delve into the multifaceted aspects of rice, including its significance as a food source, the challenge of Zn malnutrition, the genotypic variation in seed Zn content and the intriguing role of seed microflora endophytes in shaping rice plant health and nutrition. The present study was planned to survey the different rice genotypes and to determine their inherent seed zinc content. Also, the population density of different nutritional types of seed endophytic bacteria of selected representatives of rice genotypes was analysed and correlated with zinc content of seed.
Survey and collection of rice genotypes
 
A survey was conducted in rice growing regions of South India and 34 different rice genotypes were collected from Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore; Tamil Nadu Rice Research Institute, Aduthurai and ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad. The seeds of rice genotypes were collected and brought to the laboratory. The details of the samples are presented in Table 1.
 

Table 1: Details of Rice genotypes collected from different locations.


 
Analysis of seed zinc content of rice genotypes
 
Zinc concentration in rice samples was estimated using non-destructive, energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (EDXRF) instrument (model Hitachi X- supreme 8000; Oxford Instruments plc, Abingdon, UK) at TRRI, Aduthurai. Ten grams of well dried rice seed sample from each genotype was de husked using non-metallic de-husker (Krishi international 810 de-husker) having roller made of polymer to avoid zinc contamination. De-husked rice was cleaned by removing broken seed and debris and 5g of each sample was weighed and transferred to sample cups. The sample cups were gently shaken for uniform distribution of samples and kept for analysis in EDXRF. Concentration of seed Zn was expressed in milligram/ kilogram (mg kg-1) or parts per million (ppm) seed.
 
Isolation and enumeration of seed endophytic microflora
Surface sterilization of seed samples
 
One gram of rice seeds of each Karuppunel, CO51 and ADT39 genotypes was taken in triplicate to isolate endophytic bacteria. To ensure the seeds were free from external contaminants, a surface sterilization process was applied to rice seeds. This involved rinsing the rice seeds with sterile distilled water, washing them with 70% ethanol for 30 seconds, treating them with 1% sodium hypochlorite for 150 seconds, followed by another 30-second wash with 70% ethanol. The sterilized seeds were rinsed three to four times with sterile distilled water to eliminate any remaining traces of the sterilizing agents. To validate the efficacy of the sterilization process, a 100 µl sample of the last rinse water was plated on nutrient agar and then incubated at 30±2°C for 48 to 72 hours.
 
Analysis of seed microbial endophytes
 
The surface-sterilized seed samples of three rice genotype were immersed in 10 ml of sterile water for 1 h to soften them and then macerated well with 10 ml of sterile water using a sterilized pestle and mortar, yielding a 10-1 dilution. To obtain a countable number of colonies, all the suspensions (10-1 dilutions) were thereafter serially diluted at the appropriate times. The suitable dilutions for each sample from all three genotypes were spread plated on Nutrient Agar (NA), Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA), Soil Extract Agar (SEA), Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) and Rose Bengal Agar (RBA). The plates were incubated at 30±2°C for 4-5 days and observed each day for the appearance of bacterial colonies. The total number of colony-forming units (CFU g-1 of seeds) was counted for enumerating the population.
 
Statistical analysis
 
All the data were statistically analysed in Microsoft Excel and add-in with XLSTAT version 2022.1.1.1251 (M/s. Addinsoft Inc., USA). Each treatment was performed with at least three replications and the standard deviation was calculated and expressed in mean ± SD of three replicates. Significant differences among the treatments were statistically analysed using Tukey’s test performed at a 5% significance level. Correlation analysis was done between seed endophytic bacterial population and zinc content by using Pearson correlation coefficient and all the graphs were constructed by using Origin Pro 2023b version 10.0.5.157 (Gomez and Gomez, 1984; Rodrigues et al., 2014).
Analysis of inherent seed zinc content of rice genotypes
 
Seeds of 34 different rice genotypes comprising landraces and modern cultivars were collected and their inherent zinc content was analysed (Fig 1). Of the total 34 rice genotypes analysed Zn content of 16 genotypes ranged from 7 to 14 mg kg-1 of seeds, in 11 genotypes the range was between 14 to 24 mg kg-1 and 7 genotypes contained 24-44 mg kg-1of inherent seed Zn content and categorized as low, medium and high Zn varieties (Table 2). Under each category of rice genotypes based on seed Zn content one genotype was selected considering the prevalence of cultivation by farmers. The selected rice genotypes were Karuppunel with 44.33 mg kg-1, CO51 with 18 mg kg-1and ADT 39 with 12 mg kg-1 for further studies and characters of selected genotypes are presented in Table 3. Several authors reported the occurrence of wide variation in seed zinc content in rice genotypes and it was 15.9 and 58.4 mg kg-1 (Graham et al., 1999), 15.3 to 58.4 mg kg-1 (Gregorio, 2002), 16.2-21.2 mg kg-1 (Pathak et al., 2017), 14.5 to 35.3 mg kg-1 (Maganti et al., 2020). Zinc in rice seed is distributed all through the endosperm. Hence, estimates of zinc in brown rice are effective indicators of zinc in polished rice (Maganti et al., 2020). The zinc micronutrient density in rice seeds across genotypes is influenced by a complex network of interconnected metabolic processes. These processes encompass uptake from the soil, transportation to source tissues and mobilization or remobilization to developing seeds (Grusak, 2002; Chandel et al., 2010).
 

Fig 1: Inherent seed zinc content of rice genotypes of South India.


 

Table 2: Variation in seed zinc content among selected rice genotypes.


 

Table 3: Characters of the rice genotypes used in the present study.


 
Population dynamics of seed endophytic bacteria of the selected rice genotypes
 
Seeds of  rice genotypes were used for the enumeration of total bacterial population using different growth media which include Nutrient Agar (a nutrient-rich medium for the enumeration of non-fastidious microorganisms), Tryptic Soya Agar (suitable for fastidious and non-fastidious microorganisms), Soil Extract Agar (which supports the growth of variety of soil microorganisms), Potato Dextrose Agar and Rose Bengal Agar (which supports the growth of variety of fungi) and results were presented in Table 4 and Fig 2. The total number of culturable bacteria obtained was found to be the highest in the Karuppunel followed by CO51 and ADT 39. More population of bacteria was enumerated using NA followed by TSA and SEA from three rice genotypes. Comparing the population among the rice genotypes on NA plates i.e., 76 × 104 CFU g-1 in Karuppunel, followed by 69 × 104 CFU g-1 in CO51 and 61 × 104 CFU g-1 in ADT 39. Of the total number of bacterial endophytes enumerated a portion of 38%, 33% and 29% were obtained using NA. Over all, the concentration of endophytic bacterial population was in the order Karuppunel>CO51>ADT39 obtained using bacterial growth media which supported different nutritional types of bacteria. No fungal population was detected on standard fungal growth media. The results were in parallel with Hardoim et al., (2015) who detected up to 3.5 × 105 CFU g-1 of fresh tissue in rice seeds and Aswini et al., (2023) enumerated seed bacterial endophytes population in wheat seeds in which NA media held the highest population ranging from 12 × 102 to 57 × 102 CFU g-1 of seeds. Similarly, Singh et al., (2018); Sai Prasad et al., (2021); Manias et al., (2020) and Sharma et al., (2023) who used diverse growth media for the study of different nutritional types of endophytes.
 

Fig 2: Percentage of bacterial population in the seeds of rice genotypes obtained using different growth media.


 

Table 4: Seed endophytic bacterial population of rice genotypes differing in their seed zinc content.


 
Correlation between grain zinc concentration and endophytic bacteria density
 
A correlation analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between the population of seed endophytic bacteria and zinc content (Fig 3). All the endophytic bacterial population grown on different media showed positive correlation with the inherent seed zinc content of seed. The positive correlation between seed endophytic bacterial population and seed Zn content is likely due to the role of these bacteria in facilitating zinc uptake, transport within the plant, enhance nutrient availability, resulting in increased zinc accumulation in seeds (Wang et al., 2019; Makar et al., 2021). This symbiotic relationship may contribute to higher seed Zn content, ultimately benefiting the plant’s nutrition and growth.
 

Fig 3: Correlation between the seed endophytic bacterial population and zinc content of rice genotypes.

In conclusion, this study examined the seed zinc content of wild and cultivated rice genotypes, in South India highlighting significant variation in Zn concentration i.e., 7 to 44.33 mg kg-1 of seeds among the genotypes. Furthermore, our investigation into seed bacterial endophytes in three selected genotypes revealed the occurrence of various types of seed endophytic bacteria in high number. The landrace, Karuppunel exhibited the highest abundance, followed by the medium Zn content CO51 and low Zn content ADT 39. The positive correlation between seed endophytic bacterial population and seed zinc content across different growth media suggests a consistent and potentially significant biologically relationship. Since this high Zn concentration invites varying types and more population of microflora to become partner with host, their interaction with host plant would be helpful to the plant during its growth through improved nutrient uptake and biotic and abiotic stress resistance.
The authors express their gratitude to ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Rajendhranagar, Telangana, for providing the seeds. They also acknowledge Tamil Nadu Rice Research, Aduthurai, for offering facilities for zinc content estimation in seeds. The Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, is recognized for providing facilities for carrying out the research work.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

  1. Afzal, I., Shinwari, Z.K., Sikandar, S., Shahzad, S. (2019). Plant beneficial endophytic bacteria: Mechanisms, diversity, host range and genetic determinants. Microbiological Research. 221: 36-49.

  2. Aswini, K., Suman, A., Sharma, P., Singh, P.K., Gond., Pathak, D. (2023). Seed endophytic bacterial profiling from wheat varieties of contrasting heat sensitivity. Frontiers in Plant Science. 14: 1101818. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1101818.

  3. Bajaj, R., Huang, Y., Gebrechristos, S., Mikolajczyk, B., Brown, H., Prasad, R., Bushley, K. E. (2018). Transcriptional responses of soybean roots to colonization with the root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica reveals altered phenylpropanoid and secondary metabolism. Scientific Reports. 8(1): 10227. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26809-3.

  4. Barret, M., Briand, M., Bonneau, S., Préveaux, A., Valière, S., Bouchez, O., Hunault, G., Simoneau, P., Jacques, M.A. (2015). Emergence shapes the structure of the seed microbiota. Applied and Environmental Microbiology.  81(4): 1257-1266. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03722-14.

  5. Chandel, G., Banerjee, S., See, S., Meena, R., Sharma, D., Verulkar, S. (2010) Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer levels and native soil properties on rice grain Fe, Zn and protein contents. Rice Science. 17(3): 213-227.

  6. Gaiero, J.R., McCall, C.A., Thompson, K.A., Day, N.J., Best, A.S., Dunfield, K.E. (2013). Inside the root microbiome: Bacterial root endophytes and plant growth promotion. American Journal of Botany. 100(9): 1738-50. doi: 10.3732/ajb. 1200572. 

  7. Gitaitis, R. and Walcott, R. (2007). The epidemiology and management of seedborne bacterial diseases. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 45: 371-397.

  8. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons. Chichester, UK.

  9. Graham, R., Senadhira, D., Beebe, S., Iglesias, C., Monasterio, I. (1999). Breeding for micronutrient density in edible portions  of staple food crops: Conventional approaches. Field Crops Research. 60(1): 57-80.

  10. Gregorio, G.B. (2002). Progress in breeding for trace minerals in staple crops. The Journal of Nutrition. 132(3): 500S-502S.

  11. Grum, M., Camloh, M., Rudolph, K., Ravnikar, M. (1998). Elimination of bean seed-borne bacteria by thermotherapy and meristem culture. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 52: 79-82.

  12. Grusak, M.A. (2002). Enhancing mineral content in plant food products. Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 21: 178S- 183S.

  13. Hardoim, P.R., Van Overbeek, L.S., Berg, G., Pirttilä, A.M., Compant, S., Campisano, A., Döring, M., Sessitsch, A. (2015). The hidden world within plants: Ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 79(3): 293- 320.

  14. Li, L., Zhang, Z., Pan, S., Li, L., Li, X. (2019). Characterization and metabolism effect of seed endophytic bacteria associated with peanut grown in south China. Frontiers in Microbiology. 10: 659. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02659.

  15. Lugtenberg, B.J., Caradus, J.R.,  Johnson, L.J. (2016). Fungal endophytes for sustainable crop production. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 92: 194. doi: 10.1093/femsec/ fiw194.

  16. Luo, S.L., Chen, L., Chen, J.L., Xiao, X., Xu, T.Y., Wan, Y., Rao, C., Liu, C.B., Liu, Y.T., Lai, C., Zeng, G.M. (2011). Analysis and characterization of cultivable heavy metal-resistant bacterial endophytes isolated from Cd-hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. and their potential use for phytoremediation. Chemosphere. 85(7): 1130-1138.

  17. Maganti, S., Swaminathan, R., Parida, A. (2020). Variation in iron and zinc content in traditional rice genotypes. Agricultural Research. 9: 316-328. DOI:10.1007/s40003-019-00429-3.

  18. Makar, O., KuŸniar, A., Patsula, O., Kavulych, Y., Kozlovskyy, V., Woliñska, A., Skórzyñska-Polit, E., Vatamaniuk, O., Terek, O., Romanyuk, N. (2021). Bacterial endophytes of spring wheat grains and the potential to acquire Fe, Cu and Zn under their low soil bioavailability. Biology. 10(5): 409. doi: 10.3390/biology10050409. 

  19. Manias, D., Verma, A., Soni, D.K. (2020). Isolation and characterization of endophytes: Biochemical and molecular approach. In Microbial Endophytes. Woodhead Publishing. 1-14.

  20. Pathak, K., Rahman, S.W., Bhagawati, S., Bhabesh, G. (2017). Assessment of nutritive and antioxidant properties of some indigenous pigmented hill rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars of Assam. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research.  51(3): 214-220. Doi: 10.18805/ijare.v51i03.7909.

  21. Rashid, S., Charles, T.C., Glick, B.R. (2012). Isolation and characterization of new plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Applied Soil Ecology. 61: 217-224.

  22. Rodrìýguez, C.E., Mitter, B., Barret, M., Sessitsch, A., Compant, S. (2018). Commentary: Seed bacterial inhabitants and their routes of colonization. Plant Soil. 422: 129-134. doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3368-9.

  23. Rodrigues, F.W., Otuki, G.F., Morais, G.F., de Morais, M.A.C., Zafalon, R. (2014). Using the software OriginPro® 9.1. 0 as a tool for optimization of the process of removing uranium contaminated water sour-phases and loading elution.  Iberoamerican Journal of Applied Computing. 4(1): 1-10.

  24. Sai Prasad, J., Aswini, K., Sharma, P., Gond, S., Suman, A. (2021). A novel wheat matrix medium (WMM) for rapid isolation of hydrolytic enzyme producing bacterial seed endophytes. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 9: 2181-2197. doi: 10.20546/ ijcmas.2020.912.258.

  25. Santoyo, G., Moreno-Hagelsieb, G., del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda, M., Glick, B.R. (2016). Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiological Research. 183: 92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.008.

  26. Shahzad, R., Khan, A. L., Bilal, S., Asaf, S., Lee, I.J. (2017). Plant growth promoting endophytic bacteria versus pathogenic infections: An example of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RWL-1 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici in tomato. Peer J. 5: e3107. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3107.

  27. Sharma, P., Aswini, K., Sai Prasad, J., Kumar, N., Pathak, D., Gond, S., Venkadasamy, G., Suman, A. (2023). Characterization of actinobacteria from wheat seeds for plant growth promoting traits and protection against fungal pathogens.  Journal of Basic Microbiology. 63(3-4): 439-453.

  28. Shearin, Z.R., Filipek, M., Desai, R., Bickford, W.A., Kowalski, K.P., Clay, K. (2018). Fungal endophytes from seeds of invasive, non-native Phragmites australis and their potential role in germination and seedling growth. Plant Soil. 422: 183- 194. doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3241-x.

  29. Singh, D., Geat, N., Rajawat, M. V. S., Prasanna, R., Kar, A., Singh, A.M., Saxena, A.K. (2018). Prospecting endophytes from different Fe or Zn accumulating wheat genotypes for their influence as inoculants on plant growth, yield and micronutrient content. Annals of Microbiology. 68(12): 815-833.

  30. Truyens, S., Weyens, N., Cuypers, A., Vangronsveld, J. (2015). Bacterial seed endophytes: Genera, vertical transmission and interaction with plants. Environmental Microbiology. 7: 40-50. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12181.

  31. Wang, Q., Ye, J., Wu, Y., Luo, S., Chen, B., Ma, L., Pan, F., Feng, Y., Yang, X. (2019). Promotion of the root development and Zn uptake of Sedum alfredii was achieved by an endophytic bacterium Sasm05. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 172: 97-104.

Editorial Board

View all (0)