Nitrogen uptake
The nitrogen uptake by the plants exhibited variations ranging from 9.25 to 19.14 kg ha
-1 during the vegetative stage, 20.05 to 38.55 kg ha
-1 in the flowering stage, 29.87 to 46.69 kg ha
-1 during pod development and 34.76 to 55.44 kg ha
-1 at maturity (Table 1). Among all the treatments, STCR - IPNS-1.4 t ha
-1 consistently displayed the highest nitrogen uptake across all stages, while the absolute control recorded the lowest nitrogen uptake.
During the vegetative stage, the most significant N uptake was observed in STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha
-1 (19.14 kg ha
-1), followed by STCR-NPK alone-1.4 t ha
-1 (18.38 kg ha
-1), while STCR-IPNS-1.2 t ha
-1 (18.25 kg ha
-1) showed a similar level of uptake. In contrast, the absolute control exhibited the lowest nitrogen uptake, measuring 9.25 kg ha
-1. At peak flowering stage, when using only STCR-NPK treatments, the N uptake levels were 30.21 kg ha
-1, 35.86 kg ha
-1 and 37.18 kg ha
-1 for target yields of 1.0 t ha
-1, 1.2 t ha
-1 and 1.4 t ha
-1, respectively. In comparison, the nitrogen uptake levels for STCR-IPNS treatments were 31.42 kg ha
-1, 36.93 kg ha
-1 and 38.55 kg ha
-1, respectively. The STCR treatments outperformed both the farmer’s practice (23.97 kg ha
-1) and the absolute control (20.05 kg ha
-1) in a statistically significant manner. A consistent pattern of findings was observed during the Pod development stage. The highest nitrogen (N) uptake was documented in the STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha
-1 treatment, registering at 46.69 kg ha
-1. Following this, the same treatment without organics produced the next highest nitrogen uptake at 42.08 kg ha
-1. Subsequently, the STCR-IPNS-1.2 t ha
-1 treatment exhibited a nitrogen uptake of 41.88 kg ha
-1. The lowest nitrogen (N) uptake was observed in the absolute control treatment, amounting to 29.87 kg ha
-1. Significant variations in N uptake were observed during the maturity stage. Among all the treatments and treatment combinations, STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha
-1 demonstrated outstanding performance by achieving the highest N uptake of 55.44 kg ha
-1. In contrast, the lowest N uptake was recorded in the absolute control treatment, measuring at 34.76 kg ha
-1.
The enhanced nitrogen (N) uptake in blackgram can be attributed to the presence of an efficient and well-developed root system, which contributes to the decomposition of organic matter. This decomposition, in turn, increases the organic matter content in the soil, enhancing the availability of nutrients in the rhizosphere. This improved nutrient availability is a result of the combined application of organic and inorganic fertilisers, leading to increased nitrogen uptake by the plants. These findings align with the results reported by
Singh et al., (2016) in chickpea,
Sakarvadia et al., (2016) in pigeonpea and
Salunkhe et al., (2018) in cowpea.
Phosphorus uptake
Table 2 provided a comprehensive illustration of the pronounced impact of diverse fertiliser recommendations on phosphorus (P) uptake by the plants across the distinct physiological stages of crop growth. In vegetative stage, the multitude of treatments demonstrated their individual efficacy in promoting P uptake in the plants. Remarkably, the STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha
-1 treatment exhibited the highest P uptake, registering at 7.14 kg ha
-1 and it was closely followed by the same treatment without the inclusion of organic manures (6.28 kg ha
-1). The lowest phosphorus (P) uptake was documented in the absolute control, amounting to 4.06 kg ha
-1. At peak flowering stage, the highest phosphorus (P) uptake was observed in the STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha
-1 treatment, with a notable value of 16.85 kg ha
-1, showcasing its individual and more pronounced influence in facilitating P mobilization compared to other recommendations. Following closely, the same treatment without organics exhibited a P uptake of 16.19 kg ha
-1. The lesser P uptake was documented with absolute control (11.89 kg ha
-1). Notable differences were observed during the pod development stage, with the highest phosphorus (P) uptake recorded in the STCR-IPNS treatment targeting a yield of 1.4 t ha
-1, at 21.59 kg ha
-1. This was followed closely by the STCR-NPK alone treatment targeting 1.4 t ha
-1 and the STCR-IPNS treatment targeting 1.2 t ha
-1, with P uptakes of 20.55 kg ha
-1 and 19.87 kg ha
-1, respectively, which were comparable to each other. The lowest P uptake was observed in the absolute control, at 12.45 kg ha
-1. A consistent pattern of results was also observed during the maturity stage. The highest phosphorus (P) uptake was achieved by the STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha
-1 treatment, at 25.37 kg ha
-1 and the STCR-NPK alone-1.4 t ha
-1 treatment, at 24.39 kg ha
-1. These two treatments outperformed all other treatments and treatment combinations in facilitating P uptake by the plants. In contrast, the lowest P uptake was recorded in the absolute control treatment, with only 13.08 kg ha
-1.
The application of farmyard manure (FYM) reduces phosphorus (P) fixation by releasing a significant amount of various organic substances and organic acids during decomposition. Additionally, it induces chelating effects on micronutrients, which likely enhances the availability of phosphorus. Consequently, the combined application of inorganic and organic fertilisers has led to a significant overall increase in nutrient uptake, offering a cost-effective and long-lasting solution. FYM plays a crucial role in solubilizing insoluble or fixed phosphorus, rendering it readily available to plants in an easily absorbable ionic form. These findings align with the research of
Kumpawat (2010);
Patil et al. (2010) and
Mehta et al., (2015).
Potassium uptake
Table 3 provides data on the uptake of potassium by plants at different stages of crop growth.
Significant variations in potassium uptake were observed during the vegetative stage, with the highest uptake recorded in the STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha
-1 treatment, amounting to 18.47 kg ha
-1. This uptake was notably higher than that of other treatments with various fertiliser dosages at this stage. The subsequent highest potassium uptake observed in the STCR-NPK alone - 1.4 t ha
-1, measuring 18.19 kg ha
-1. Additionally, the STCR-IPNS-1.2 t ha
-1 showed a potassium uptake of 17.59 kg ha
-1 and these values were found to be similar to each other. The lowest potassium uptake was observed in the absolute control, with only 10.25 kg ha
-1. There were remarkable variations observed among the treatments in potassium uptake by plant at peak flowering stage. The higher uptake of K was registered with STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha
-1 (40.83) and it was closely followed by STCR-NPK alone-1.4 t ha
-1 (38.39). The lowest uptake was recorded with absolute control (22.56). During the pod development stage, there were notable variations in potassium uptake among the treatments with different fertiliser and IPNS dosages. In the case of the STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha
-1 treatment, the highest potassium (K) uptake was recorded at 51.68 kg ha
-1, followed closely by the same treatment without organic components, which achieved a K uptake of 50.54 kg ha
-1. All STCR and blanket fertiliser recommendations, including the farmer’s practice, exhibited their distinct effects on potassium uptake. The lowest K uptake, measuring 31.88 kg ha
-1, was observed in the absolute control. A comparable pattern of results was observed during the maturity stage, with the highest potassium (K) uptake achieved by the STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha
-1, recording a value of 60.68. Following closely, the STCR-NPK alone-1.4 t ha
-1 exhibited a potassium uptake of 59.73, which was similar to the former. In contrast, the lowest K uptake, at 39.47 kg ha
-1, was recorded in the absolute control.
This phenomenon could be attributed to the enhanced development of the root system, which in turn facilitates improved nutrient transportation, maintains cell wall integrity and ultimately contributes to higher crop yields. Given that nutrient uptake is inherently linked to both nutrient content and crop yield, the increased yield of black gram, along with higher potassium (K) content distributed throughout the plant, likely resulted in the elevated uptake of these nutrients by the crop. These findings align with the research conducted by
Kumar et al., (2020); Movalia et al., (2020) and
Naznin et al., (2020).
Quality parameters
Crude protein and crude protein yield
Significant fluctuations in both crude protein levels and crude protein yield within and across the various treatments and treatment combinations (Fig 1). The highest levels of crude protein and yield were achieved with STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha
-1 (24.09% and 332 kg ha-1), closely followed by STCR-NPK alone-1.4 t ha
-1 (23.58% and 310 kg ha
-1). These two STCR treatments exhibited a significant individual impact compared to other fertiliser recommendations. In contrast, all other treatments and treatment combinations showed similar effects in terms of both crude protein and crude protein yield. The lowest values for crude protein and yield were observed in the absolute control (19.45% and 163 kg ha
-1).
The synergistic use of inorganic fertilisers in conjunction with organic manures had a clear and significant positive impact on both the production of crude protein and the absorption of nitrogen, as visually exemplified in Fig 2. Enhancing the absorption of nitrogen, a crucial element forming the building blocks of amino acids and proteins, likely contributed to the rise in crude protein content through these treatment combinations. The improvement in grain quality attributed to the application of organic manures can be attributed to better nutrient availability for the crop, potentially resulting in the accumulation of increased quantities of seed components such as calcium carbonate. Additionally, this enhanced nutrient uptake might have led to heightened lipid metabolism, ultimately aiding in the augmentation of protein content in the grains. These outcomes align with similar observations made by
Kadam et al., (2014); Amruta et al., (2016) and
Singh et al., (2017) regarding both crude protein content and yield.
Crude fibre
The various treatments did not exert a significant influence on the crude fibre content of blackgram, which ranged from 3.34 to 3.51 per cent (Table 4). The lowest crude fibre content was observed in the case of STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha
-1 (3.34%), followed closely by STCR-IPNS-1.2 t ha
-1 (3.36%) and STCR-IPNS-1.0 t ha
-1 (3.38%), all of which exhibited similar levels. In contrast, the highest crude fibre content was found in the absolute control (3.51%). Crude fibre represents the insoluble remnants resulting from acid-alkaline hydrolysis, comprising true cellulose and insoluble lignin. Notably, the crude fibre content tends to decrease with higher nitrogen doses, which is a critical parameter for supplementation in feed applications.
Modgil et al., (2019), Kanchana (2020) and
Kanth et al., (2021) have documented congruent findings in their respective studies.
Total sugars and true protein
Sugar plays a crucial role as a fundamental energy source necessary for the sustenance of all living organisms. This organic molecule is produced by plants
via photosynthesis and subsequently undergoes decomposition in the course of respiration.
Total sugars and true protein had significant variations among treatment and treatment combinations has illustrated in the Table 4. The highest content of total sugars and true protein was recorded with STCR-IPNS-1.4 t ha
-1 (29.43 mg g
-1 and 2.80%) followed by the same treatment without organics (28.59 mg g
-1 and 2.71%) comparable with each other. The lowest total sugars were recorded with absolute control (22.62 mg g
-1 and 1.98%). The rise was likely the result of nutrients stimulating RNA synthesis, which in turn causes plants treated with nutrients to have higher protein concentrations.
Parthasarathi et al., (2008) and
Modgil et al., (2019) likewise demonstrated the significant influence of protein and total sugars.