This experiment revealed (Table 1) that growth attributes like height of plants and accumulation of dry matter at 60 and 90 DAT and at harvest were significantly influenced by the weed management treatments in rice. The treatment, bispyribac sodium @ 25 g ha
-1 at 15 DAT + paddy weeder at 30 DAT treatment (P
3) recorded the maximum plant height at harvest (117.62 cm) except the complete weed free treatment which had also significantly taller plants than all the chemical and integrative weed management treatments in both years. The paddy crop with complete weed free (P
4) treatment registered highest accumulation of dry matter (1288.40 g m
-2 at 90 DAT and 1531.80 g m
-2 at harvest) at 90 DAT and harvest which differed significantly with other treatments in both years. This was might be due to no competition of paddy with weeds during the later period of crop growth. This weed free treatment was closely followed by bispyribac sodium + paddy weeder treatment (P
3) at 90 DAT (1262.30 g m
-2) and harvest (1511.80 g m
-2).
Adilakshmi et al. (2022) found that the treatment combination with bispyribac sodium showed better growth attributes of paddy. At 30 DAT, bispyribac sodium + paddy weeder treatment (P
3) achieved shortest plants and minimum dry matter accumulation due to some phytotoxic effect of bispyribac sodium though insignificant variation was found. Paddy crop under P
5 i.e., weedy check treatment recorded the shortest plants with lowest dry matter accumulation at all the stages of crop growth except 30 DAT. Paddy grown in complete weed free plots
i.e., P
4 option registered the maximum number of tillers m
-2 (179.81 m
-2 at 30 DAT, 287.90 m
-2 at 60 DAT, 245.40 m
-2 at 90 DAT and 228.74 m
-2 at harvest) on all the dates of observation followed by bispyribac sodium + paddy weeder
i.e., P
3 option (175.56 m
-2 at 30 DAT, 286.60 m
-2 at 60 DAT, 242.40 m
-2 at 90 DAT and 225.61 m
-2 at harvest) which varied significantly with other chemical and integrative weed management treatments. This was mainly due to lower crop-weed competition under these treatments than others.
Yield attributing characters (Table 2) such as number of panicles m
-2, number of filled grains panicle
-1 varied significantly under different weed management treatments for both the years. The treatment, completely weed free
i.e., P4 noted down the maximum number of panicles m
-2 and number of filled grains panicle
-1 followed by bispyribac sodium + paddy weeder
i.e., P
3 treatment and they were statistically at par. This was due to higher dry matter accumulation under these treatments than others during the later period of crop growth. Paddy crop under P
5 i.e., weedy check recorded the lowest number of panicles m
-2 as well as number of filled grains panicle
-1 due to maximum weed density during the crop growing period. The test weight was not significantly influenced by various weed controlling options.
Among weed management treatments, paddy crop under no weed
i.e., P
4 treatment exhibited the maximum productivity of grains (6.68 t ha
-1) trailed by P
3 i.e., bispyribac sodium + paddy weeder treatment (6.54 t ha
-1) (Table 2). Crop remained under weedy check
i.e., P
5 treatment noted down the minimum yield of grains (5.79 t ha
-1). The crop treated with pretilachlor @ 0.75 kg ha
-1 at 3 DAT + paddy weeder at 30 DAT
i.e., P
1 the exhibited the highest straw yield (8.26 t ha
-1) followed by weed free
i.e., P
4 (8.25 t ha
-1) and P
3 i.e., bispyribac sodium + paddy weeder treatment (8.19 t ha
-1). These three treatments had also been found statistically
at par. Crop treated as weedy check
i.e., P
5 recorded the lowest straw yield of paddy (7.91 t ha
-1) on pooled basis (Table 2). Maximum harvest index was recorded to weed free
i.e., P
4 (45.06%) followed by P
3 i.e., bispyribac sodium + paddy weeder treatment (44.39%) and the lowest harvest index was recorded with weedy check treatment
i.e., P
5 (42.29%).
The weed species were identified in both the years. From initial stage to 45 DAT, there was maximum number of broad-leaved weeds. The occurrence of grasses was thereafter 45 DAT. The Common broadleaved weeds were
Ottelia alismoides,
Sphenoclea zeylanica,
Marsilea quadrifolia,
Alternanthera sessilis. However, two types of grasses
i.e.,
Panicum repens,
Echinochloa crusgalli and one type of sedge
i.e.,
Scirpus articulate were found.
The data presented in Table 3 revealed irrespective of different levels of weed control treatment, the first date of observation (15 DAT) regarding weed population did not appear in any categories of weeds might be due to preparation of weed free puddled beds with proper depth of water submergence.
The total weed population and weed dry weight were recorded under different weed management treatments on 30 DAT, 45 DAT and 60 DAT. Lowest weed population (0.71 m
-2 on all the dates) and weed dry weight (0.71 g m
-2 on all the dates) were recorded in completely weed free
i.e., P
4 treatment followed by P
3 treatment
i.e., bispyribac sodium + paddy weeder at all the dates of observation (weed population and weed biomass were 2.34 m
-2 and 2.95 g m
-2 at 30 DAT, 2.75 m
-2 and 3.94 g m
-2 at 45 DAT and 2.82 m
-2 and 3.88 g m
-2 at 60 DAT, respectively). Highest weed population and weed biomass were recorded in weedy check
i.e., P5 treatment on all the dates.
The best efficiency in controlling weeds (WCE) and weed control index (WCI) were recorded (Table 4) in pooled data to those paddy crops which were treated with complete weed free treatment
i.e., P
4 (100.00% in both WCE and WCI on all the dates) followed by P
3 i.e., bispyribac sodium + paddy weeder treatment (WCE was 76.48% at 30 DAT, 79.01% at 45 DAT and 80.79% at 60 DAT and WCI was 80.17% at 30 DAT, 72.30% at 45 DAT and 82.51% at 60 DAT) and the lowest weed control index and lowest efficiency in controlling weeds was obtained with the crop under weedy check
i.e., P
5 on the different dates of observations (0.00% in both WCE and WCI at 30 DAT, 45 DAT and 60 DAT) as no weed control measures had been followed there.
Maurya et al. (2023) reported that bispyribac sodium provided better result among the chemicals used in terms of efficient control of weeds.
Weed persistence index indicating relative gathering of dry matter of weeds in every count with compared to control, which confirmed the effectiveness of used herbicide (Table 5). This index indicated that pyrazosulfuron ethyl @ 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAT followed by metsulfuron methyl 10% WP + chlorimuron ethyl 10% WP (ready mix) @ 20 g ha
-1 at 25 DAT (P2) treatment resulted in highest value of weed persistence index at 60 DAT (1.88) and 90 DAT (1.03) whereas, it was lowest at 30 DAT (0.93). This finding strengthened the fact that application of herbicides alone initially controlled the weeds but weed infestation was again reached to maximum during the later period of crop growth.
Gupta et al. (2023) observed that the combination of other herbicide with pyrazosulfuron ethyl was capable to show lowest weed persistence index. However, complete weed free treatment (P
4) always recorded the lowest weed persistence index.
However, the lowest weed index recorded to those paddy plots which were considered as completely weed free (0.00%) followed by treated with bispyribac sodium @ 25 g ha
-1 at 15 DAT + paddy weeder at 30 DAT (2.10%) and the highest weed index was recorded in un-weeded control (13.32%) plots (Table 5).
The above table (Table 6) showed that the highest gross return was recorded in completely weed free
i.e., P
4 treatment (₹ 116700 ha
-1) followed by bispyribac sodium + paddy weeder
i.e., P
3 treatment (₹ 114480 ha
-1) whereas, the highest net return was obtained from bispyribac sodium + paddy weeder
i.e., P
3 treatment (₹ 59269 ha
-1). However, there were no crop-weed competition and results related to crop growth and yield were found best in completely weed free treatment (P
4), but the profit was reduced due to higher cost of cultivation in case of P
4 than others. Highest benefit-cost ratio was also obtained in bispyribac sodium @ 25 g ha
-1 at 15 DAT + paddy weeder at 30 DAT
i.e., P
3 treatment (2.07). Proportionately higher yield with respect to cost of cultivation was obtained in the treatment, bispyribac sodium + paddy weeder (P
3) as compared to other treatments.
Swain et al. (2023) discovered that the application of bispyribac sodium provided maximum net return from paddy among the chemical weed control options.