Growth parameters
Among the different foliar nutrients evaluated, the effect on plant height was significant only at harvest stage. Higher values of plant height were noted with the application of 1% TNAU pulse wonder spray (though it was on par with PPFM @ 500 ml ha
-1 and 2% DAP spray). The number of branches per plant did not differ significantly among the different foliar nutrients studied. Though numerically more number of branches per plant was observed with the application of 1% pulse wonder spray (5.2) and it was on par with PPFM @ 500 ml ha
-1 (4.9) and 2% DAP spray (5.0). From the results it is inferred that foliar application of nutrients did not exhibit significant difference in plant height at early stages of crop (30 DAS). However, foliar spray of 1% pulse wonder continued to satisfy the nutrient demand which resulted in significantly higher plant height at harvest and it was closely followed by PPFM @ 500 ml ha
-1 and 2% DAP spray. The presence of macro and micro nutrients and growth promoters in pulse wonder could able to increase the plant height through better growth and development of pulse crop only numerically as compared to urea which supplies only N and DAP (N and P). The significant increase in plant height might be due to the internodes elongation and the vigorous root growth. These results are very similar to the reports of
Kumar et al., (2018), which indicated that though the values of plant height was highest with 1% pulse wonder, the values were comparable with application of 2% DAP in blackgram. Branching is an important character of crop, which bears the pods and ultimately enhanced the yield of crop. The number of branches per plant however did not differ among the different foliar nutrients tried. Though TNAU pulse wonder would have accelerated various metabolic processes by means of macro and micronutrients, no significant variation was observed. The presence of nitrogen and phosphorus in DAP, MAP and All 19:19:19 fertilizer would have also increased the number of branches through its vital role in cell division and hence non-significant would have occurred.
Kumar et al., (2018) observed no significant difference for number branches between TNAU Pulse wonder and 2 % DAP. The results from the leaf area index computed revealed that differences in LAI of blackgram among the different foliar application were at all the stages of observation. Among the different foliar nutrients applied, LAI was higher with foliar spray of 1% pulse wonder at 45 and 60 DAS. However these values were on par with PPFM @ 500 ml ha
-1 spray and 2% DAP spray (Table 2, 3 and 4).
The mean data on dry matter production (kg ha
-1) recorded at, 45, 60 DAS and at harvest are presented in Table 5, 6 and 7. Foliar nutrients had greater influence on influence on dry matter production at all the stages of observation except 30 DAS as the treatment was imposed only on 30 DAS. Irrespective of the treatments, dry matter accumulation showed a linear increase from 30 DAS to harvest of the crop. Foliar application of 1% pulse wonder spray produced numerically higher dry matter production at all the stages of observation though it was on par with 2% DAP spray. The LAI was significantly increased by foliar application of pulse wonder and the values are comparable with PPFM @ 500 ml ha
-1spray and 2% DAP spray. The dry matter production was accelerated after foliar application of nutrients. Foliar supplement of nutrients could have enhanced the level of available nutrients resulting in better plant growth and development.
Foliar application of nutrients had significant influence on nodule count. The nodule count was found to be significantly higher with one per cent pulse wonder at 45 DAS. The nodulation and nitrogen fixation was peak at 30 DAS (flowering and early pod-filling stage) and thereafter reduced drastically to meet demand for nitrogen for developing seed. The reduction in nodulation and nitrogen fixation may be due to preferential mobilization of assimilates for seed development which resulted in lower availability of photosynthates for nodule formation, growth, maintenance and development. This might be due to better absorption of nutrients applied through foliage, leading to better activity of functional root nodules
(Solaiappan et al., 2002). Foliar spray of pulse wonder could have supplemented the micro and macronutrients requirement for seed development and reduced the translocation of nitrogen from nodules.
Growth parameters clearly indicated the highest growth was observed with 1% pulse wonder spray though it was on par with 2% DAP. Dry matter production in above ground parts is contributed by stem, branches, leaves, pods and grains inside the pods. The significant increase of dry weight/plant with 1% pulse wonder application might be due to the fact that nitrogen helps in maintaining higher auxin level that would have resulted in better leaf area and presumably chlorophyll content of the leaves. This might have resulted into better light interception, absorption and utilization of radian energy, leading to higher photosynthetic rate and finally more accumulation of dry matter by the plants.
Yield attributes
The foliar nutrients showed significant effect on the number of pod clusters per plant. Among the foliar nutrients, though foliar application of 1% pulse wonder (6.63) significantly produced more number of pod clusters per plant, it was comparable with foliar spray of 2% DAP spray (6.10) and PPFM 500 ml/ha (5.85).
The length of the pods did not differ significant among the different foliar nutrients. The numerically higher pod length was observed with 1% pulse wonder spray (4.91cm) which was it was comparable with foliar spray of 2% DAP spray (4.44) and PPFM @ 500 ml ha
-1 (4.0). The data on number of pods per plant as influenced by foliar nutrients are presented in Table 8. The results revealed that the influence of foliar nutrients on the number of matured pods per plant was significant. Among the different nutrients sprayed, foliar application of 1% pulse wonder produced more number of pods per plant (6.63). However the values were comparable with 2% DAP (6.10) and PPFM @ 500 ml ha
-1 spray (5.85). The recorded data on mean number of seeds per pod are presented in Table 9. Foliar application of nutrients did not exert significant influence on number of seeds pod
-1. The mean data on 100 seed weight (g) are presented in Table 8. The foliar application of nutrients caused significant variation in 100 seed weight. Foliar application 1% pulse wonder registered highest 100 seed weight of 4.09 g and it was on par with 1% urea (4.02 g) and 2% DAP (3.95 g) spray.
Yield characters
Foliar nutrients exerted a significant influence on the grain yield. Foliar nutrients exerted a significant influence on the grain yield. A remarkable increase in the grain yield was achieved when different foliar spray was studied. Among the different treatments, foliar application of 1% pulse wonder registered significantly higher pod yield of 918 kg ha
-1. However the yield obtained with 1% pulse wonder spray was on par with the yield of 2% DAP and PPFM @ 500 ml ha
-1 spray. The perusal of mean data on haulm yield (Table 7, 8 and 9). Foliar application of 1% pulse wonder resulted in higher haulm yield of 1548 kg ha
-1, followed by 2% DAP spray (1418 kg ha
-1) and PPFM @ 500 ml ha
-1 (1399 kg ha
-1). The treatments 1% pulse wonder, 2% DAP and PPFM @ 500 ml ha
-1 were on par with each other for haulm yield. The yield attributes were significantly influenced by foliar nutrition with more number of pods plant
-1 being obtained by foliar application of 1% pulse wonder and it was on par with 2% DAP and PPFM @ 500 ml ha
-1. Timely supply of nutrients through foliar spray during peak nutrient demand might have reduced shedding of flowers and fruits resulting in higher number of pods. Foliar application of nutrients was significant in grain filling as the 100 seed weight varied among different source of nutrients
(Ashraf et al., 2023). The grain filling was highest with foliar application of 1% pulse wonder, closely followed by 2% DAP and PPFM @ 500 ml ha
-1 spray. This may be due to increase in photosynthates production and effective translocation of assimilates from source to sink. Further yield might be also due to increased uptake of nutrients by blackgram through effective translocation of nutrients from sink to reproductive area of crop (Fig 1).
Effective partitioning of photosynthetic assimilates from leaves to pods might be the reason for attaining higher harvest index through foliar application of 1% pulse wonder and 2% DAP solution. The foliar nutrients might have supplemented the nutrient demand of the crop at the critical stage, resulting in better growth and development of the crop and ultimately the yield attributing characters and enhanced positive source-sink gradient of photosynthates translocation guaranteeing seed formation and better grain-filling
(Manivannan et al., 2002). These positive impacts on yield attributes by foliar application of 1% pulse wonder and 1% DAP resulted in higher grain yield.
Das and Jana (2015) also reported that significantly higher seed yield of pulses with application of 2% DAP spray. However
Kumar et al., (2018) reported that foliar application of 2% DAP twice at flower initiation (flowering stage) and pod formation stage (15 days later of flowering) produced significantly higher seed yield, which was comparable with 19:19:19 (NPK) 2% spray and TNAU pulse wonder spray.
Economics
Among the foliar nutrients, higher gross return (₹ 50,490/- ha
-1), net return (₹ 26,000/- ha
-1) and BCR (2.03) were obtained with foliar spray of 1% pulse wonder. Economic analysis of the data indicated that adoption of foliar application of nutrients increased the monetary returns (Table 10). The cost of cultivation did not differ much among the cultivation practices adopted. Among the foliar nutrients, higher gross return (₹ 50,490/- ha
-1), net return (₹ 26,000/- ha
-1) and BCR (2.03) were obtained with foliar spray of 1% pulse wonder. The increase in gross and net return was mainly due to increase in grain yield.