Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Screening of Soil Ameliorants to Enhance the Productivity of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) under Sodic Soil in Cauvery Delta Zone of Tamil Nadu

R. Mohanapriya1,*, R. Kalpana2, K. Vijay Aravinth3, M. Guna4, K. Udhaya Kumar1, M. Silambarasa1
1Division of Agronomy, School of Agricultural Sciences, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore-641 114, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
3Department of Agronomy, SRS Institute of Technology and Sciences, Dindigul-624 710, Tamil Nadu, India.
4North Karnataka Agricultural Crop Forecasting and Research Centre, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad-580 005, Karnataka, India.

Background: In India, about 6.75 million ha, which is around 2.3% of the country’s geographical area is salt affected of which 3.79 million ha is sodic soil. Total sodic soil area in Tamil Nadu is around 0.36 million ha, accounting for 9.5% of total sodic soil area in India. Reclamation of salt-affected soil using drainage is expensive and leaching with good quality water is uneconomical in shallow water table areas. Addition of organic amendments performs a dual role in these situations by enhancing gypsum solubility and improving soil physico-chemical characteristics. 

Methods: In this context a field experiment was conducted at Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tiruchirappalli during summer season of 2021 and 2022 to study the reclamation potential of ameliorants under sodic soil. The experiments were laid out in split plot design with three replications. The treatments comprised of different soil amendments in main plot and foliar nutrition in sub plot. 

Result: The results showed that, gypsum @ 50% GR+CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha-1 registered significantly higher growth parameters viz., plant height (53.5 and 58.4 cm), no. of branches plant-1 (7.27 and 6.75), DMP (2791 and 2801 kg ha-1), physiological characters viz.,CGR (4.12 and 4.46 g m-2 day-1), SPAD value (27.70 and 29.96), RWC (64.10 and 56.15%) and soluble protein (74.60 and 69.72 mg g-1) at harvest. It also increased grain yield of 834 and 875 kg ha-1 with higher exchangeable Ca and Mg with lower Na content during 2021 and 2022 year of experiments. 

 

Soil degradation caused by salinization and sodification is of universal concern. In arid and semiarid regions of the world, soil degradation caused by salinity and sodicity is a major environmental threat to soil fertility and agricultural productivity. Due to the concomitant effects of salt and sodicity, saline-sodic soils are formed which leads to soil dispersion due to high Naconcentrations in the soil solution or at the exchange phase and loss of soil physical structure due to clay swelling (Wong et al., 2009). However, salinity limits morphological, chemical, biochemical and metabolic processes by causing osmotic imbalances and specific ion toxicities, which have an adverse effect on plant growth (Parida and Das, 2005).
       
Gypsum is the most often used amendment for sodic soil reclamation. Due to its limited solubility, increasing the efficacy of applied gypsum in the absence of adequate water is a difficult task. Addition of organic materials enhancing gypsum solubility there by helping to improve the soil physico-chemical characteristics. Pressmud is a widely available industrial by-product used to accelerate the solubilization of gypsum by organic acids produced during decomposition (Sundhari et al., 2018) and (Bokhtiar et al., 2001). Microbial culture of CSR GROMOR with gypsum as soil application improved water absorption, nutritional uptake and crop yield (Chatterjee et al., 2012). Supplemental foliar feeding is critical for improving crop growth and yield. It also improves photosynthetic rate and nutrient transfer from leaves to developing seeds (Sridhar et al., 2020). Brassinosteroid and melatonin are the pleiotropic plant hormones that influences a variety of physiological and developmental processes including growth, seed germination and senescence. Also, it stimulates plant development and protects against water stress, salt stress and pathogen attack (Zhou et al., 2013).
The field experiment was conducted during summer season of 2021 and 2022 at field No. D2b at Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College, Tiruchirappalli. The experimental site is located at 11°32' North latitude, 78°83' East longitude and at an altitude of 85 m above MSL. Both the experiments were laid out in split plot design with three replications. The treatments comprised of different soil amendments viz., M1-Pongamia GLM @ 6.25 t ha-1, M2- Pressmud @ 10 t ha-1, M3 -CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha-1, M4- Gypsum @ 50% GR, M5 -Gypsum @ 50% GR+Pongamia GLM @ 6.25 t ha-1, M6- Gypsum @ 50% GR+CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha-1, M7- Gypsum @ 50% GR+Pressmud @ 10 t ha-1 and M8- Control, in main plots and foliar nutrition in sub plots viz., S1- Foliar spray (FS) of CSR GROMOR 3% @ 30 DAS, S2- Foliar spray of Brassinosteroid 0.2 ppm @ 30 DAS and S3- Foliar spray of Melatonin 60 ppm @ 30 DAS. The statistical analysis was carried out by AGRES software at 5% level of significance.
 
Gypsum requirement
 
The gypsum requirement of the soil was determined using the following equation (Richards, 1954):
 
Where,
GR- Net gypsum requirement (t ha-1).
ESPi- Initial exchangeable sodium percentage.
ESPf- Final exchangeable sodium percentage.
CEC- Cation exchangeable capacity (c mol (p+) kg-1).
 
CSR GROMOR
 
CSR GROMOR developed by Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana is a bio growth enhancer based on consortia of microorganisms viz., CSR-B-2 (Bacillus pumilus), CSR-B-3 (Bacillus thuringiensis) and CSR-T-1 (Trichoderma harzianum) that acts as a nutrient vitalizer, soil conditioner and growth enhancer under sodic soil.
       
Growth parameters were measured periodically at 30, 45 DAS and harvest stage, yield attributes and yield were recorded at harvest stage. Physiological parameters were estimated by the following procedures:
 
Crop growth rate
 
CGR was calculated as per the formula suggested by Watson (1958) expressed in gm-2 day-1.
 
 
Where,
W1 and W2- whole plant dry weight (g) at time t1 and t2.
P- Spacing (m2).
tand t2- initial and final day of period of observation.
 
SPAD value
 
Using a SPAD 502 Plus chlorophyll metre (Naus et al., 2010), the greenness of the leaves was assessed between 11 AM and 12 PM.
 
Relative water content
 
RWC was estimated by the method prescribed by Barrs and Weatherly (1962).


Soluble protein
 
It was estimated by the procedure suggested by Waterborg (2009) and expressed as mg g-1. Exchangeable Ca, Mg and Na were analysed using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) and expressed as c mol (p+) kg-1.
Growth parameters
 
Combination of different soil amendments and foliar nutrition greatly influenced the growth characters presented in Table 1. Among different soil amendments, the height of plant was maximum with application of gypsum @ 50% GR+CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha-1 (M6) which produced 53.5 and 58.4 cm at harvest during 2021 and 2022 which also recorded higher no.of branches plant-1 (7.27 and 6.75) and DMP (2791 and 2801 kg ha-1) during both the year of experiment. This might be due to improvement in soil properties and subsequent increase in crop growth brought about by the displacement of exchangeable Na from the solid phase. The results are in agreement with Qadir et al., (2002), Sugeng et al., (2011) and Ahemad and Kibert (2014). Whereas control (M8) treatment constantly produced lower values of growth characters at harvest. Among different foliar application, plant height was maximum with FS of brassinosteroid 0.2 ppm @ 30 DAS (S2) which produced 47.4 and 54.4 cm during 2021 and 2022. The same treatment recorded more no.of branches plant-1 (6.53 and 6.27) and DMP (2442 and 2691 kg ha-1) at harvest. This might be due to brassinosteroids are known to induce longitudinal growth of young tissues via cell elongation and cell division and vascular differentiation, which is a developmental process critical for plant growth. These findings are in line with Hu et al., (2000).
 
Physiological parameters
 
Among different soil amendments, significantly higher CGR of 4.12 and 4.46 g m-2 day-1 was recorded with gypsum @ 50 % GR + CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha-1 (M6) during 2021 and 2022 with higher values of chlorophyll content (27.70 and 29.96) and RWC (64.10 and 56.15%) (Table 2). It also recorded higher soluble protein (74.60 and 69.72 mg g-1) at harvest (Fig 1). It was statistically comparable with gypsum @ 50 % GR + pressmud @ 10 t ha-1 (M7). This could be due to desired Ca2+ availability in the soil solution replacing exchangeable Na+ from the clay lattice and supplementation of calcium, sulphur and potassium in response to added gypsum and organic amendments (Singh et al., 2016). Significantly lower values of physiological parameters were under in control (M8). Among different foliar application, higher CGR of 3.86 and 4.15 g m-2 day-1, SPAD value of 26.51 and 30.45, RWC of 57.83 and 56.89% and soluble protein content of 70.74 and 68.36 mg g-1, respectively was recorded in FS of brassinosteroid 0.2 ppm @ 30 DAS (S2) at harvest during both 2021 and 2022. It seems to be due to its involvement in improving transcription and translation mechanism more efficient for the synthesis of photosynthetic pigments (Bajguz, 2000). Whereas, the lower values were recorded in FS of CSR GROMOR 3% @ 30 DAS(S1).
 
Yield attributing charactersand yield
 
Table 3 shows significantly higher number of pods plant-1 and seeds pod-1 was observed with gypsum @ 50% GR+CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha-1 (M6) with the values of 35.53 and 32.49 pods plant-1 and 12.69 and 12.67 seeds pod-1 during 2021 and 2022 year of experiments which also registered higher grain yield of 834 and 875 kg ha-1, respectively. It was followed by gypsum @ 50% GR+pressmud @ 10 t ha-1 (M7) and gypsum @ 50% GR+Pongamia GLM @ 6.25 t ha-1 (M5).It may be attributed directly to the nutritional effect and indirectly through improved soil physical and chemical properties. The results confirm with Sharma et al., (2001) and Makoi and Ndakidemi, (2007). The lowest numbers were recorded under control (M8). FS of brassinosteroid 0.2 ppm @ 30 DAS (S2) resulted in 29.30 and 32.53 pods plant-1 and 11.27 and 13.04 seeds pod-1 during 2021 and 2022 year of experiments which also obtained higher grain yield of 725 and 761 kg ha-1, respectively. Timely supply of nutrients through foliar spray, might have reduced shedding of flowers and fruits and led to a positive source-sink gradient of photosynthates translocation. This finding is in line with Manivannan et al., (2002).
 
Soil characteristics
 
Influence of different soil amendments showed markable variations on soil exchangeable cations at harvest (Table 4).  Among main plot treatments, significantly higher amount of exchangeable Ca (10.98 and 14.80 c mol (p+) kg-1) and Mg (7.93 and 8.71 c mol (p+) kg-1) content with lower Na content (2.99 and 3.41 c mol (p+) kg-1) was observed in gypsum @ 50% GR+CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha-1 (M6) during 2021 and 2022 year of experiments. Decomposition of amendments increased the ionic concentration and mobilized native CaCO3 leading to reduction in soil sodicity and improved soil properties. Similar findings by Choudhary (2011) and Prapagar et al., (2012). There was no significant difference in sub plot treatments.
The study revealed that addition of gypsum @ 50% GR+CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha-1 registered significantly higher growth and physiological parameters at harvest stage. It also increased yield attributes and yield of green gram. Hence it is concluded that application of gypsum @ 50% GR+CSR GROMOR @ 25 kg ha-1 in VBN (Gg) 2 variety had a remarkable effect in ameliorating soil sodicity with enhanced green gram productivity under resource constraint and sodic soil condition.
None.

  1. Ahemad, M. and Kibret, M. (2014). Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Current perspective. Journal of King saud University-Science. 26(1): 1-20.

  2. Bajguz, A. (2000). Effect of brassinosteroids on nucleic acids and protein content in cultured cells of Chlorella vulgaris. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 38(3): 209-215.

  3. Barrs, H.D. and Weatherley, P.E. (1962). A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences. 15(3): 413-428.

  4. Bokhtiar, S.M., Paul, G.C., Rashid, M.A., Mafizur Rahman, A.B.M. (2001). Effect of press mud and inorganic nitrogen on soil fertility and yield of sugarcane grown in High Ganges River Floodplain soils of Bangladesh. Indian Sugar. 51(4): 235-241.

  5. Chatterjee, R., Jana, J.C., Paul, P.K. (2012). Enhancement of head yield and quality of cabbage (Brassica oleracea) by combining different sources of nutrients. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 82(4): 324-8.

  6. Choudhary, H.R., Sharma, O.P., Yadav, L.R., Choudhary, G.L. (2011). Effect of organic sources and chemical fertilizers on productivity of mungbean. Journal of Food Legumes. 24(4): 324-326.

  7. Hu, Y., Bao, F. and Li, J. (2000). Promotive effect of brassinosteroids on cell division involves a distinct CycD3-induction pathway in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal. 24(5): 693-701.

  8. Makoi, J.H. and Ndakidemi, P.A. (2007). Reclamation of sodic soils in northern Tanzania, using locally available organic and inorganic resources. African Journal of Biotechnology. 6(16).

  9. Manivannan, V., Thanunathan, K., Mayavaramban, V., Ramanathan, N. (2002). Effect of foliar application of N, P, K and chelated micronutrients (microsol) on growth and yield of rice- fallow urdbean. Legume Research-An International Journal. 25(4): 270-272.

  10. Nauš, J., Prokopová, J., Øebíèek, J., Špundová, M. (2010). SPAD chlorophyll meter reading can be pronouncedly affected by chloroplast movement. Photosynthesis Research. 105: 265-271.

  11. Parida, A.K. and Das, A.B. (2005). Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: A review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 60(3): 324-349.

  12. Prapagar, K., Indraratne, S.P., Premanandharajah, P. (2012). Effect of Soil Amendments on Reclamation of Saline-sodic Soil.

  13. Qadir, M., Qureshi, R.H., Ahmad, N. (2002). Amelioration of calcareous saline sodic soils through phytoremediation and chemical strategies. Soil Use and Management. 18(4): 381-385.

  14. Richards, L.A. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. LWW. 78(2): 154.

  15. Sharma, D.R., Minhas, P.S., Sharma, D.K. (2001). Response of rice-wheat to sodic water irrigation and gypsum application. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 49(2): 324-327.

  16. Singh, Y.P., Mishra, V.K., Singh, S., Sharma, D.K., Singh, D., Singh, U.S., Ismail, A.M. (2016). Productivity of sodic soils can be enhanced through the use of salt tolerant rice varieties and proper agronomic practices. Field Crops Research. 190: 82-90.

  17. Sridhar, S.M., Supriya, C., Krishnaveni, S.A. (2020). Productivity Enhancement through Foliar Nutrition in Green Gram (Vigna radiata). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 9(4): 807-811.

  18. Sugeng, W., Didik, S., Eko, H. (2011). Effects of humic compounds and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria on phosphorus availability in an acid soil. Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment. 3(7): 232-240.

  19. Sundhari, T., Thilagavathi, T., Baskar, M., Thuvasan, T., Eazhilkrishna, N. (2018). Effect of gypsum incubated organics used as an amendment for sodic soil in green gram. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 6: 304-308.

  20. Waterborg, J.H. (2009). The Lowry Method for Protein Quantitation. The Protein Protocols Handbook. 7-10.

  21. Watson, D.J. (1958). The dependence of net assimilation rate on leaf-area index. Annals of Botany. 22(1): 37-54.

  22. Wong, V.N., Dalal, R.C., Greene, R.S. (2009). Carbon dynamics of sodic and saline soils following gypsum and organic material additions: A laboratory incubation. Applied Soil Ecology. 41(1): 29-40.

  23. Zhou, X.Y., Song, L., Xue, H.W. (2013). Brassinosteroids regulate the differential growth of Arabidopsis hypocotyls through auxin signaling components IAA19 and ARF7. Molecular Plant. 6(3): 887-904.

Editorial Board

View all (0)