Growth attributes of linseed
The data given in Table 1 revealed that in respect of plant population (m
-2), at 15 and 60 DAS, the variety Parvati has the highest plant population at 15 DAS (99.00 m
-2) whereas the variety T-397 has the lowest value (94.33 m
-2). At 60 DAS the variety Priyam had the highest plant population mortality with 2.17%, whereas JLS-95 had the lowest plant population mortality with 0.66% this could result from a cutworm infestation. For controlling the cutworm, @ 63 ml of Chlorpyriphos was applied on the soil and to prevent the wilting of the leaf, @ 96 g of Indofil was used. Bio-pesticides neem oil (0.5% l
-1) was also used to control the insect pest. The Initial and final plant population (m
-2) at 15 and 60 DAS were not significantly influenced by different varieties and moreover at the initial stage plant population was maintained in each plot. The findings are in agreement with
Shivanand et al., (2020). Irrespective of different varieties, plant height of linseed increased with advancement of crop age. At 30 DAS, the variety JLS-95 (14.30 cm) was significantly more in plant height which was at par with variety Shekhar (13.22 cm) and found lowest with LSL-93 (10.68 cm) which was at par with variety RLC-153 (11.04), T-397 (11.49), Priyam (11.77) and Parvati (11.99). At 60 DAS and 90 DAS similar trend was found in the variety JLS-95 has become much taller (46.17 cm and 62.60 cm, respectively) which was found lowest in varietyLSL-93 (21.87 cm and 41.36, respectively) which was at par with variety T-397 (43.92 cm). The observable growth variability may be explained by their genetic ability to use the resources available for their growth and development. The findings of the experiment are consistent with
Shivanand et al., (2020). The data showed that there was increase in number of leaves plant
-1 from 30 to 60 DAS and 60 to 90 DAS in different linseed varieties. At 30 DAS, variety JLS-95 was bearing significantly maximum number of leaves plant
-1 (40.67) which was statistically at par with the variety Shekhar (38.27) and minimum number of leaves plant
-1 were found in variety Parvati (30.27) which remained at par with variety RLC-153. At 60 and 90 DAS, significantly maximum number of leaves plant
-1 were found in JLS-95 (335.33 and 419.53, respectively) and minimum in variety LSL-93 (156.60, 211.47, respectively). This may be due to difference in genetic makeup of different varieties.
In Table 2 the data showed that from 30 to 60 DAS, number of branches plant
-1 were significantly higher in variety JLS-95 (3.20, 6.40, respectively) and minimum in variety Shekhar and LSL-93 (1.93, 2.27, respectively) which was at par with variety T-397 and Shekhar (2.00, 2.51, respectively). The JLS-95 variety put more effort into encouraging the development of lateral buds, which led to an increase in the number of branches since it was more susceptible to environmental influences. The crop’s genetic composition and environmental conditions, both of which have a substantial impact on the crop’s ultimate seed yield, result in a bigger number of branches plant
-1. The results were similar with the findings of
Mohammed et al., (2020) and
Bhagyalaxmi et al., (2022). The data showed that with the advancement of crop age, there was increase in dry matter of plant. At 30 DAS maximum dry matter plant
-1 was found in variety JLS-95 (0.143 g) which was minimum with variety Parvati (0.053 g) which was at par with variety T-397 (0.067 g). At 60 and 90 DAS, dry matter plant
-1 was also significantly highest in variety JLS-95 (0.81 g, 2.85 g, respectively) and minimum in variety T-397 (0.34 g) at 60 DAS and in variety LSL-93 (1.32 g) at 90 DAS found at par with variety T-397 (1.39 g). The difference in dry matter plant
-1 among different linseed varieties might be due to difference in plant height, number of leaves and number of branches among different varieties. This result was correlated with the findings of
Mohammed et al., (2020) and
Shivanand et al., (2020). At 30-60 DAS, CGR (g m
-2 day
-1) was significantly higher with variety JLS-95 (1.48) and found lowest with variety T-397 (0.61) which was at par with variety RLC-153 (0.66) whereas, at 60-90 DAS it was significantly higher with variety JLS-95 (4.54) and was found lowest in the variety LSL-93 (1.63). Significantly higher CGR in JLS-95 may be due to more number of branches which resulted in more photosynthesis and finally more dry matter accumulation. This finding is in agreement with
Sameer et al., (2021). At 30-60 DAS, RGR was found significantly higher with variety Parvati (0.072) and was found minimum in the variety RLC-153 (0.044) which was at par with variety Shekhar and Priyam (0.047, 0.049, respectively), whereas at 60-90 DAS it was found significantly higher with variety Priyam (0.052) and minimum with variety LSL-93 (0.027). This may be due to different varieties that produced different content of plant dry matter (g plant
-1).
Yield attributes of linseed
In Table 3 it was observed that the number of capsules plant
-1 were significantly higher with variety JLS-95 (82.13) and found lowest with variety LSL-93 (29.13). Number of capsules plant
-1 in variety Parvati (66.00) were at par with variety T-397 (63.07). Variety Priyam (62.60) and T-397 (63.07) were at par. Number of capaules
-1 were 49.77 in variety RLC-153 and 33.93 in variety Shekhar. Number of branches plant
-1 in variety JLS-95 were significantly more at 30 as well as 60 DAS which finally resulted in high rate of photosynthesis and maximum number of capsules. As variety LSL-93 showed minimum number of branches at 60 DAS which finally resulted in minimum number of capsules plant
-1. These findings are corroborative to those of
Maurya et al., (2017),
Alam et al., (2019) and
Shivanand et al., (2020). Seed yield (kg ha
-1) was significantly higher in the variety JLS-95 (1089.67 kg ha
-1) and minimum was recorded with variety LSL-93 (671.33 kg ha
-1) which was at par with Shekhar (766.00 kg ha
-1). The maximum yield of the JLS-95 variety may be attributable to a greater biomass build-up caused by a maximum number of leaves plant
-1, maximum number of branches plant
-1, maximum number of capsules plant
-1 and a suitable partitioning as shown by higher yield features. Similar results were recorded by
Prakash et al., (2015) and
Bhagyalakmi et al., (2022). Stover yield was significantly higher with variety JLS-95 (1753.33 kg ha
-1) which was at par with variety Priyam (1653.33 kg ha
-1) and minimum with variety LSL-93 (1400.00 kg ha
-1) which was at par with variety Parvati (1476.67 kg ha
-1), Shekhar (1450.00 kg ha
-1), T-397 (1436.67 kg ha
-1) and RLC-153 (1550.00 kg ha
-1). This may be due to maximum plant height, number of leaves and branches plant
-1in variety JLS-95 which finally resulted in highest stover yield. As plant height, number of leaves and branches plant
-1 were minimum in LSL-93 so as the stover yield. This may be also due to favourable environment and photosynthesis activity which increased the accumulation of dry matter in the plant. This finding is in consensus with those of
Ahmad et al., (2017) and
Emam (2019). The data revealed that harvest index in variety T-397 (39.56%) was significantly higher and was at par with variety JLS-95 (38.38%), RLC-153 (37.08%), Parvati (37.79%) and it was found minimum with variety LSL-93 (32.43%) which was at par with variety Shekhar (34.14%) and Priyam (34.07%). This could be a result of improved dry matter conservation from sources to sinks, hence the superiority of the variety T-397, JLS-95, RLC-153 and Parvati may be attributable to its superiority in biological and seed yield. Minimum harvest index in variety LSL-93 can be the result of minimum seed as well as stover yield. The present finding is in with agreement with
Mohammed et al., (2020).