Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 57 issue 2 (april 2023) : 194-197

Screening of Herbicides in Transplanted Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn]

Jangam Bhavana1,*, R. Krishnan2, P. Murali Arthanari1, R. Kalpana1, C.N. Chandrasekhar3, R. Ravikesavan4
1Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Nammazhvar Organic Farming Research Centre, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
3Water Technology Centre, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
4Centre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
Cite article:- Bhavana Jangam, Krishnan R., Arthanari Murali P., Kalpana R., Chandrasekhar C.N., Ravikesavan R. (2023). Screening of Herbicides in Transplanted Finger Millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn] . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 57(2): 194-197. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-6048.
Background: Weeds smother the finger millet due to crop’s slow growth during the initial stages which reduces the yield substantially by 5-70%. Intensive use of herbicides is gaining popularity among the farmers now a days due to its effectiveness in controlling weeds, timeliness and reduced cost.   

Methods: The current field experiment was conducted at Tamil Nadu Agricultural university during kharif season, 2021 under irrigated condition with twelve herbicide treatments laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. 

Result: Pre-emergence application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 15 g ha-1 significantly reduced the total weed density and total weed dry weight at 90 days after transplanting over all the other herbicides used. This treatment also considerably improved the plant parameters such as plant height, total number of tillers, plant dry matter production, Grain and stover yield and yield parameters such as productive tillers, ear head weight of transplanted finger millet which was statistically followed by the application of pendimethalin 750 g ha-1 as pre-emergent spray. Similar trend was followed in case of net returns and B: C ratio. while lower plant parameters were observed with the application of tembotrione 12 g ha-1.
Finger millet is one of the worlds important staple food crops which usually grown in arid and semiarid regions and it is the sixth most produced crop in India after wheat, rice, maize, sorghum and bajra. It is popularly known as ragi in south India. Finger millet crop is a highly productive crop that can thrive well even under various harsh environmental conditions. According to Indian statistics the crop occupies a share 11.5 lakh hectares in terms of area with a production and productivity of 19.9 lakh tonnes and 1724 kg ha-1, respectively. Whereas, in case of Tamil Nadu, it occupies an area of 82.9 thousand hectares with a production of 2.8 lakh tonnes and a productivity 3481 kg ha-1 (Anonymous 2021).

Though the crop is vital for its nutritional quality, the productivity is decreasing due to several factors like improper nutrient management, incidence of blast disease and weeds infestation. Critical period of crop weed competition is five weeks after planting of ragi (Nanjappa 1980). As the crop growth is slow during the initial stages, the weeds pose drastic reduction in yield due to higher competition between weeds and crop. The yield reduction was ranged from 34 to 61% due to uncontrolled weed growth (Ramachandra Prasad et al., 1991). Though manual weeding is effective for management, it is considered as non-feasible due to scarcity of labour, higher labour wages and it is time consuming. Under such situations appropriate technology with less labour will be of more helpful to control the weeds efficiently. According to Rathore et al., (2010), applying post-emergence herbicide for weed control resulted in reduced labour requirements compared to intercultural operations. Farmers are also seeking for the selective pre- or post-emergence herbicides, which are less expensive than manual weeding for timely weed control in finger millet crop. Hence an experiment was conducted to screen suitable pre-emergence, early post emergence and post emergence herbicides for effective weed management in transplanted finger millet.
A field study was conducted at Eastern Block Farm of Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during kharif season of 2021 to find out the suitable herbicides for efficient weed control in transplanted finger millet. The experiment comprising three replications was laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD). Finger millet variety ATL 1 was used as an experimental material.

Twelve herbicides were considered to study the efficiency of the herbicides in weed management of transplanted finger millet. During the field trial, N, P and K were provided at 60:30:30 ratio in the form of urea, SSP and MOP where P, K and half of the N dose was applied basally and the remaining half of N was applied in two equal split doses at 30 DAT and 45 DAT. All other agronomic procedures remained standard across all treatments of the experiment.
 
Data analysis
 
The data regarding plant biometric observations, yield and weed observations were recorded and analysed by using ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) and mean of the treatments were compared with LSD at 5 % probability level using the statistical analysis software AGRESS and Correlation co efficient was analyzed using PATH software.
Effect of herbicides on weeds
 
The most prevalent weeds in the finger millet crop that have been observed at various growth stages were broadleaved weeds such as Trianthema portulacastrum, Parthenium hysterophorous, Amaranthus viridis, Digera arvensis, grasses such as Cynodon dactylon, Echinochloa colona, Dactyloctenium aegyptium and sedges like Cyperus rotundus. Weed management methods led to substantial differences in weed density at 90 DAS (Table 1) at 5% level of significance. The weed density was considerably lower in treatments applied with pyrazosulfuron ethyl @15 g ha-1. The result demonstrated a significant decline in weed density as a result of the post-emergence application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 15 g ha-1 which was followed by pendimethalin 750 g ha-1. Whereas higher weed density was observed with the application of topramezone 20 g ha-1. Similar trend was followed with the weed dry weight at 90 DAT. The lesser weed density and weed dry weight at 90 DAT by the application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 15 g ha-1 was due to the inhibition of ALS enzyme activity in the meristematic tissues of weed species that ultimately lead to the poor growth of weeds. These findings are in line with Ramadevi et al., (2021) in finger millet, Ramesha et al., (2017), Pal et al., (2012), Saini et al., (2008), Angiras and Kumar (2005) and Chopra and Chopra (2003) in transplanted rice.

Table 1: Effect of weed management treatments on weed and crop growth parameters in transplanted finger millet.


 
Effect of herbicides on crop growth
 
The growth of crop was significantly influenced using herbicides in transplanted finger millet which was depicted in Table 1. Among all the herbicides, PE application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 15g ha-1 (T2) exerted significant influence on the growth parameters such as plant height (118.78 cm), total number of tillers (120) and dry matter production (7172 kg ha-1) at harvest which was followed by PE application of pendimethalin 30 EC @ 750 g ha-1 (T5) with 108.67 cm, 102, 6546 kg ha-1 at harvest respectively. The increased growth parameters were the consequence of effective weed control, which reduced competition for finger millet and enhanced nutrient availability, which increased the number of tillers and plant height, which in turn increased the dry matter production in finger millet crop. These results were corroborated with the findings of Ramadevi et al., (2021). Complete death was observed in ragi plants that were treated with POE application of topramezone 20 g ha-1 which might be due to 4 -Hydroxyphenyl-pyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) enzyme inhibition in finger millet (Ramadevi et al., 2021). Lower growth of the plant parameters was observed with the POE application of tembotrione 12 g ha-1 (64.35 cm plant height, 66 number of total tillers and 3637 kg ha-1 DMP at harvest). The main cause of the growth slowdown was severe weed competition for the available resources.
 
Effect of herbicides on yield and yield parameters
 
The herbicides provided positive influence on the yield (Fig 1) and yield parameters of fingermillet (Table 2). Among different herbicides, pyrazosulfuron ethyl 15g ha-1 (T2) which was applied as pre-emergent herbicide recorded significantly improved yield i.e., grain yield (2685 kg ha-1) and stover yield (4563 kg ha-1) and the yield attributes such as number of productive tillers (117), ear head weight (5.4 g). The next best treatment is PE application of pendimethalin 30 EC @ 750 g ha-1 (T5). The improved yield might be due to the result of improved weed control at the early stages using pre-emergence herbicides, that might have improved the dry matter production and better translocation, partitioning of photosynthates for sink requirements which ultimately showed in better expression of yield and yield parameters. The other yield parameters such as ear length, fingers per ear and test weight are failed to show the significant interaction between the treatments. Complete yield loss was observed with the application of topramezone 20 g ha-1 as Post emergence herbicide. Lower yield was observed with the POE application of tembotrione 12 g ha-1 with a grain yield 1369 kg ha-1 of and stover yield of 2326 kg ha-1. Similarly superior yield and yield attributes with pyrazosulfuron ethyl was reported by Rajendra Kumar et al., (2018), Ramesha et al., (2017) and Saini et al., (2008) in transplanted rice.

Fig 1: Effect of herbicides on the grain yield (kg/ha) and stover yield (kg/ha) of transplanted finger millet.



Table 2: Effect of different treatments on yield, yield parameters and economics of transplanted finger millet.


 
Effect of herbicides on economics
 
Economic analysis of the herbicides tested indicated that higher gross returns (₹ 88202), net returns (₹ 52376) and B: C ratio (2.46) were recorded with the PE application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 15g ha-1 (T2) which was closely followed by PE application of pendimethalin 750 g ha-1 (T5) with gross returns, net returns and B: C ratio of ₹ 80349, ₹ 43524 and 2.18 respectively. Higher net returns could be due to higher grain yield, straw yield and efficient control of the weeds combined with lower cost weed control using herbicides. Similar trend was observed with Bhatt et al., (2017), Kumar et al., (2017) and Rana et al., (2018) in transplanted rice.
 
Correlation study
 
In the past, growth in any experimentation was compared using variance analysis. After the 1970s, data interpretation diverged toward quantitative and qualitative analysis, with various criss-cross view tools supporting the conventional variance technique. The current study tries to use correlation to explain the variation among two or more variables using PATH software.

Simple correlation studies of crop grain yield, productive tillers, weed density and weed dry matter were worked out from the data. Correlation coefficient between grain yield and productive tillers, plant height and dry matter production showed positive significance among the treatments while negative relationship was observed with weed density and weed dry weight which was depicted in Table 3.

Table 3: Correlation co efficient between grain yield, Weed density and weed dry matter at 90 DAT, productive tillers.


  1. Angiras, N.N., Kumar, S. (2005). Efficacy of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl against weeds in rice nursery under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 37(3): 151-154.

  2. Anonymous. (2021). Selected State-wise Area, Production and Productivity of finger millet in India (2020-21). https:// www.indiastat.com.

  3. Bhatt, P.S., Yakadri, M., Madhavi, M., Sridevi, S., Rani, P.L. (2017). New generation herbicide combinations on weed indices, yield and economics of transplanted rice in Telangana state. Agriculture Update. 12: 2079-2084.

  4. Chopra, N.K., Chopra, N. (2003). Effect of doses and stages of application of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl on weeds in transplanted  rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 35: 27-29.

  5. Kumar, A., Naresh, V.R.K., Ghasal, P.C., Kumar, R., Singh, V., Kumar, S., Chaudhary, K. (2017). Weed management effects on weed control efficiency, yield and economics of transplanted rice in typic ustochrept soil of Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 5(4): 1346-1351.

  6. Nanjappa, H.V. (1980). Crop-weed competition and weed control studies in finger millet (Eleusine coracana). Ph. D Thesis. University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore. 

  7. Pal, S., Ghosh, R.K., Banerjee, H., Kundu, R., Alipatra. A. (2012). Effect of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl on yield of transplanted rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 44(4): 210-213.

  8. Rajinder, K., Rana, A., Rana, S.S., Rana, M.C., Sharma, N., Sharma,  G.D. (2018). Influence of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl on soil microflora, weed count and yield of transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology  and Applied Sciences. 7(2): 1757-1764.

  9. Ramachandra, P.T.V., Narasimha, N., Dwarakanath, N., Munegowda, M.K., Krishnamurthy, K. (1991). Integrated weed management in drilled finger millet. Mysore Journal Agricultural Sciences. 25: 13-19.

  10. Ramadevi, S., Sagar, G.K., Subramanyam, D., Kumar, A.R.N. (2021). Weed management in transplanted finger millet with pre and post-emergence herbicides. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 53(3): 297-299.

  11. Ramesha, Y.M., Ajayakumar, M.Y., Manjunatha, B., Krishnamurthy D., Roopashree, D.H. (2017).  Bio-efficacy of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl against weeds in transplanted rice. Acta Scientific Agriculture. 1(1): 6-10.

  12. Rana, A., Rana, M.C., Rana, S.S., Sharma, N., Kumar, S. (2018). Weed control by pyrazosulfuron-ethyl and its influence on yield and economics of transplanted rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 50(4): 309-314. 

  13. Rathore, A.L., Singh, A.P., Sharma, M.L., Shaw, S.S. (2010). Weed Management in Direct Seeded rice for Enhancing Water Productivity under Rainfed Environment. Proceedings of the Biennial Conference of Indian Society of Weed Science. 211-227. 

  14. Saini, J.P., Rana, S.S., Kumar, S. (2008). Efficacy of Pyrazosulfuron-Ethyl with Respect to Dose and Time of Application against Weeds in Direct Seeded Rice (Oryza sativa). National symposium on New Paradigms in Agronomic Research, Navsari, Gujarat. 320-321.

Editorial Board

View all (0)