Soil parameters
Bulk density and porosity
The mass of soil per unit volume including pore space is known as bulk density. Compactness and porosity of soil is indicated by bulk density. The combined application of manures and fertilizers decreased the bulk density of soil. The results showed that the highest bulk density was recorded in the control which remains same during both years. The bulk density was decreased in those plots which amended with manures and fertilizers as compared to control and sole NPK fertilizers. Bulk density (g cm
-3) ranged from 1.68 to 1.83 gcm
-3. The control plot bulk density same as initial value during first year but slightly increased during second year of study. The minimum bulk density (1.68 g cm
-3) was recorded in T6- 50% RDF+10t FYM+V.C@ 2 tha
-1 + azotobacter ha
-1 followed by T
7-50% RDF+15t FYM+azotobacter ha
-1 (1.69 g cm
-3) (Table 2). That might be due to manures which affect soil physical properties which significantly lowered bulk density and enhance porosity. All the treatments were shown non-significant difference from each other. The maximum bulk density (1.83 g cm
-3) recorded in the control during both years. The porosity (%) was significant among treatments. The change in porosity (%) was recorded after the application of manures and fertilizers to soil. The minimum porosity (31%) recorded in the control followed by T
1 (100% RDF) having 31.22% porosity. The maximum porosity (36.66 %) and T
7- 36.22% was recorded in T
6- 50% RDF+10 t FYM+V.C@ 2 t ha
-1+ azotobacter ha
-1 followed by T
8- 25% RDF+ azotobacter + V.C@ 2 t ha
-1 with 35.96% (Table 2). The interaction of FYM and RDF exerted positive effect on the accumulation of soil organic matter. As the soil organic matter increased porosity increased and bulk density reduced. This result is in confirmity with the findings of
John et al., (2021); Li et al., (2020) and
Liu et al., (2021). Kiboi et al., (2019) observed that the improvement in soil physical properties of soil was due the presence of an organic acid which formed organominerals. These organominerals resulted soil aggregation and added functional components of organic matter to soil.
pH
Soil pH is considered as an important soil health indicator. Variations in pH of soil after integrated application of manures and fertilizers were statistically different among treatments. pH ranged from 7.30 to 7.41 where highest (7.41) pH recorded in T2- RDF (125:60:30) kgha
-1 followed by T
6-50% RDF+10 t FYM+V.C@ 2 t ha
-1+ azotobacter ha
-1 and lowest (7.3) recorded in the control (Table 1). Low pH in the control might be due to secretion of organic acids which caused reduction in pH. The combination of FYM+ RDF resulted increment in pH of soil that might be due to addition of organic matter which increased Cation exchange capacity and organic fractions of soil. The organic matter present in soil contains colloids which bind up the cations and increase in pH of soil
(Tokova et al., 2020).
Soil EC
Electrical conductivity is a measure of soil salinity and ability of soil solution to carry charges
(Kumari et al., 2014). EC can be used as an indicator of ionic strength
(Olowoboko et al., 2018) by estimating the amount of dissolved salts in soil solution. Release of nutrient from organic material and mineralization processes responsible for increase in salt uptake of soil. EC value of soil significantly varied among treatments. EC value ranged from 0.15 to 0.23 dS m
-1. The maximum value (0.23 dSm
-1) observed in T
2- RDF (125:60:30) kgha
-1 which was at par with T
6, T
3, T
4 (0.20 dSm
-1). The lowest value (0.15 dSm
-1) was recorded in the control (Table 1). Presence of more amount of alkaline metal
i.
e., Ca
2+, Mg
2+ and K
+) in FYM responsible for increase in EC of soil
(Mardamootoo et al., 2021 and
Rao et al., 2002).
Available N
Soil available nutrient status also varied with integrated application of manures and fertilizers. Soil available N was maximum (312.3 kgha
-1) in 50% RDF+10t FYM+V.C@ 2t ha
-1+ azotobacter ha
-1 and lowest in the control (147.66 kgha
-1) (Table 1). All the treatments showed significantly more available N as compared to the control. As the farm yard manure and vermicompost organic matter components starts to decompose, nutrients were released to soil and increase the availabilty of N. Soil inorganic N increased with integrated use of manures and fertilizers was observed which could be due to decrease in leaching of N with increase in available N. The availability of N in soil was increased that might be due to the improvement in physical conditions of soil microbial biomass and contribution of N by added quantity of FYM. Fertilizers combine with vermicompost also showed significant effect on soil available N it might be due to the vermicompost as it contains organic acids, hormones and microorganisms which stimulate microbial activity in soil
(Dias et al., 2010).
Available phosphorous
Significant differences in changes of available P were found among treatments (Table 1). After the harvesting of maize crop highest available P was found in soils of T
6-50% RDF+10t FYM+V.C@ 2t ha
-1+ azotobacter ha
-1 (25.6 kg ha
-1) followed by T
7-50% RDF+15t FYM+ azotobacter ha
-1 (23.5 kg ha
-1) and minimum available P (10.37 kg ha
-1) was recorded in the control. Interaction of FYM with biochar and synthetic fertilizers was found significant. It increased the availability of P in soil might be due to the production of organic acids in soils by FYM which release more P from SSP
(Han et al., 2021 and
Islam et al., 2021).
Available potassium
Available K in soil was significantly different from each other during both years (Table 1). After harvesting maize the highest available K (285.33 kg ha
-1) was found in T
6-50% RDF+10t FYM+V.C@ 2t ha
-1+ azotobacter ha
-1. The second highest (265.67 kg ha
-1) available K was found in T
7-50% RDF+15tFYM+azotobacter ha
-1. The lowest available K was recorded in T
1- (the control)-102.83 kg ha
-1 followed by T
1 (100% RDF)- 192.33 kg ha
-1. The other treatments were statistically comparable with the control. Available K uptake was significantly affected by the addition of organic matter in soil. It could be due to higher mineralization of potassium at more levels of organic matter. This result is also supported by
Guo et al., (2021).
Organic carbon (gkg-1)
Soil carbon is the driving agent of soil organic matter uptake and soil quality. SOC is a heterogeneous mixture of organic substances. Organic carbon was found highest in T
6- 50% RDF+10t FYM+V.C@ 2t ha
-1+ azotobacter ha
-1 (5.6 g kg
-1) and second highest OC (4.7 g kg
-1) was found in T
7 -50% RDF+15 FYM+azotobacter ha
-1 (Table 2). The lowest (3.4 gkg
-1) was found in T
0 (the control). All the treatments were significantly different among themselves. FYM addition enhanced the quantity and quality of SOM. This result is also supported by
Baghdadi et al., (2018) and
Tabbasum et al., (2021).
Yield parameters
Grain yield and Straw yield
During two years of experiment, the highest grain yield is obtained in T6 (50% recommended dose of fertilizer +10 ton farm yard manure + vermicompost@ 2 ton ha
-1 + azotobacter ha
-1) followed by T
5 and T7 (50% recommended dose of fertilizer +15 ton of farmyard manure + azotobacter ha
-1). Due to high uptake of nutrients, grain numbers cob-1 was increased which results in high grain yield at maturity. The lowest grain yield was found in T
1 (Control) as there was no application of organic and inorganic fertilizers (Table 3). These results are confirmed with findings of
(Xiao et al., 2020). The maximum straw yield is found under T
6 (50% recommended dose of fertilizer +10 ton farm yard manure + vermicompost@ 2 ton ha
-1 + azotobacter ha
-1) followed by T
7 (50% recommended dose of fertilizer +15 ton of farmyard manure + azotobacter ha
-1) (Table 3). The combination of organic manures with inorganic fertilizer shows positive effect which results in increased biomass of maize in T
6 (50% recommended dose of fertilizer +10 ton farm yard manure + vermicompost@ 2 ton ha
-1 + azotobacter ha
-1). The lowest amount of straw yield was found under T
1 (Control) as we have not applied any fertilizer or organic manure source in this treatment. FYM in combination with synthetic fertilizers increase grain yield and straw yield because of slow and timely release of nutrients and reduce N losses. Increase in yield of crops attributed to nutritional value of which increased soil fertility and productivity and increase FUE mainly N fertilizer by reducing leaching of N. These results are confirmed with the findings of
(Ghosh et al., 2020).
Harvest index
The harvest index was found highest in T
6 (50% recommended dose of fertilizer +10 ton farm yard manure + vermicompost@ 2 ton ha
-1 + azotobacter ha
-1) due to the enhancement of soil physio-chemical properties by organic manures which contribute to highest value of harvest index (Table 3). The treatment T
7 (50% recommended dose of fertilizer +15 ton of farmyard manure + azotobacter ha
-1) and T
2 (100% recommended dose of fertilizer (125:60:30) kgha
-1) are statistically non-significant and at par with each other. The lowest harvest index was found in T
1 (Control) as in this treatment no application of any organic manure and inorganic fertilizer applied. The results are confirmed with the findings of
(Felix et al., 2020). The availability of nutrients influenced by enhancing CEC, improving soil pH and direct contribution of nutrients which increased crop growth and yield
(Bala et al., 2019).
Test weight (g)
The weight of 1000 grains weight is called test weight which is an important yield attribute which gave the information regarding the efficiency of grain filling process. 1000 grain weight is the desired output which referred as one of the most important agronomic parameters which contribute in grain yield. The highest 1000- grain weight (test weight) was found in T
6 (50% recommended dose of fertilizer +10 ton farm yard manure + vermicompost@ 2 ton ha
-1 + azotobacter ha
-1) because azotobacter enhance the availability of nitrogen in soil and it increase number of grains as well as 1000- grain weight (Table 3). The treatments T
7 (50% recommended dose of fertilizer +15 ton of farmyard manure +azotobacter ha
-1) and T
2 (100% recommended dose of fertilizer (125:60:30) kg ha
-1) are statistically non- significant and at par with each other. The lowest 1000- grain weight (test weight) was found in T
1 (Control) as in this treatment there was no application of organic and inorganic fertilizer sources. These results are confirmed with the findings of
(Arif et al., 2021).