Data in Table 1 show that
significantly the highest number of productive tillers hill-1
(10.28) was observed with the wider spacing of M3
, which was significantly superior to the other geometries and was followed by M2
. The lowest number of productive tillers (2.52) were recorded with M1
Higher number of productive tillers were observed with wider spacing. Similar results were also supported by Rajbhandari (2007)
, who reported higher effective tillers with wider spacing. The different responses for hill spacing might be due to the fact that the wider spacing allowed more light, space for producing higher number of effective tillers (Sohel et al., 2009).
With respect to the nutrient management practices S6
treatment recorded the highest number of productive tillers hill-1
(8.47), which was however comparable with S5
. The least number of productive tillers hill-1
(3.84) was recorded with the absolute control, which maintained parity with S1
The increase in productive tillers might be due to the INM application of fertilizers, which make more availability of nutrients to the plant, while FYM improves the soil physical properties, hydraulic conductivity of the soil and also the availability of NPK along with all other essential plant nutrients, which promoted plant growth and development, resulting in increased yield attributes. The present findings are in close conformity with the earlier findings of Divya et al., (2017).
Ear head weight
Data pertaining to ear head weight (Table 1) of finger millet revealed that with regard to different crop geometries, M3
recorded significantly the highest ear head weight (4.22 g) and was statistically on a par with M2
treatment registered the lowest value (2.49 g).
Table 1: Yield of finger millet as influenced by crop geometry and nutrient management practices during kharif in pooled data.
These results are in conformity with the findings of Mishra et al., (1973)
and Kalaraju et al.
(2009) who reported that spacing of 30 × 30 cm prolonged the growth duration and increased the yield attributes.
The findings of Kipgen et al., 2018
in rice is in close confirmation with the present findings who observed significantly higher panicle weight with wider spacing of 20 × 20 cm and least weight in close spacing of 15 × 15 cm which might be due to competition of plants for light within the dense plants at closer hill spacing resulting in reduced panicle weight due to reduction in the rate of photosynthesis (Yadav, 2007)
. Planting of early age seedlings in main field have more opportunity to harness solar radiation for photosynthesis and established better source and sink relationship which resulted in increased weight of ear head. The results are in accordance with the findings of Amin and Haque (2009) and Balasaheb (2017)
The nutrient management practices significantly influenced the ear head weight of finger millet. The integrated nutrient management practice with high fertilizer dose with wooden log treatment (125% of RDF + FYM @ 10 tonnes ha-1
) recorded significantly the highest ear head weight (4.38 g) and was comparable with S5
. The absolute control recorded the lowest weight of ear head (2.54 g). However statistically on a par with farmers practice without wooden log treatment (S1
The current results are supported by Ahiwale et al., (2011)
who obtained highest ear head weight with integration of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients (FYM @ 5 t ha-1
plus RDF) indicating that the role of FYM is multi dimensional ranging from building up of soil organic matter, maintaining favourable soil physical and chemical properties and balanced supply of nutrients. Further, Balasaheb (2017)
stated that application of recommended dose in main field get opportunity to carry out photosynthesis and established better source and sink relationship which in turn resulted in the highest weight of panicle-1
The data recorded and analysed for yield (Table 1) manifested that crop geometries and nutrient management practices significantly influenced the yield. However the interaction effect between the treatments was statistically not significant during both years of study.
The grain (2721 kg ha-1
) and straw yields (6630 kg ha-1
) of finger millet were significantly higher at the closer spacing of 30 × 10 cm. Since the number of plants per unit area are higher in closer spacing, compared to wider spacing, this reflected in realizing greater grain yield ha-1
. Though higher number of tillers hill-1
(10.28) were recorded at wider spacing, this could not compensate for more number of plants per unit area. The current findings are also supported by the study conducted by Borkar et al., (2008).
Optimum planting pattern is the prerequisite for proper utilization of growth resources and ultimately to exploit the potential productivity of any crop. This is in agreement with the findings of Rafey and Srivastava (1988)
. Similar higher straw yield at closer spacing was also reported by (Rajesh, 2011)
, Kalaraju et al., (2011)
and Anitha (2015)
. This also agrees with the report by Shinggu et al., (2009)
who felt that closer spacing resulted in reduced weed competition rendering higher yield. Shinggu and Gani (2012)
recorded higher grain yield at 10 and 15 cm spacing and this could be attributed to higher plant population per unit area and reduced competition from weeds due to closer spacing.
Application of FYM @ 10 tonnes ha-1
+ 125% RDF along with wooden log treatment (S6
) registered significantly higher grain (3135 kg ha-1
) and straw yields (7816 kg ha-1
) which were statistically comparable with S5
treatment and the absolute control recorded the lowest yield. This may be due to sufficient and continous supply of all essential nutrients in integrated approach (Prakash et al., 2018). Vidya et al., (2018)
reported that 125 and 150% RDF might have resulted in better root activity, good source to sink relationship. Sustained release of available nutrients during crop growth period was found to increase yield substantially (Raniperumal et al., 1991, Goudar, 2014
and Senthilkumar et al., 2018).
The lowest grain and straw yields observed with control might be attributed to the poor performance of the crop due to low supply of nutrients (Mahapatra, 2017)
The data analyzed for protein content was tabulated in (Table 1). The protein content was significantly influenced by crop geometry and nutrient management practices. However their interaction was found to be non-significant. Finger millet transplantation at 30 × 10 cm with 30 days old seedlings (M1
) recorded significantly the highest protein content in grain (13.53%) followed by M2
. The lowest protein content (12.35%) was recorded with M3
(45 × 45 cm spacing with 15 days old seedlings) but statistically comparable with M2
treatment. Higher grain protein content in closer spacing was also observed by Nandini and Sridhara (2019)
in foxtail millet. The results were also in compliance with Zhang et al., (2018)
who observed maximum protein content and protein fractions at the planting density of 260 plants m-2
in wheat. It may be due to the reason that at high plant population tillers group were reduced whereas nitrogen metabolism is higher in the early stage of grain filling.
The results were also in compliance with Joginaidu et al., (2013),
who observed significantly higher protein content in a planting pattern of 25x25 cm, over 35x35 cm in rice crop and stated that planting pattern of 25 x 25 cm, might have created better growth environment with proper root development due to prevailing of optimum moisture and better availability of nutrients resulting in higher protein content.
With respect to nutrient management practices the highest protein content in grain was recorded in S6
(13.85%) and was significantly superior to S0
treatments and however on a par with rest of the nutrient management practices with and without wooden log treatment i.e
treatments. The absolute control (S0
) recorded significantly the lowest grain protein content (11.51%). The protein content in grain is infact a manifestation of nitrogen concentration. Nitrogen is a major structural constituent of cell wall thus increasing the quality by improving the protein content. The increased grain nitrogen resulted in higher protein content recorded with combined use of fertilizers and manures. The findings of present investigation are in agreement with those of Jat et al., (2003)
and Rampratap (2006). The findings are also supported by Nandini et al., (2018)
who observed higher protein content with 150% N ha-1
and least with control.