Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.20

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 56 issue 6 (december 2022) : 646-652

Wheat Yield Modelling using Infocrop and DSSAT Crop Simulation Models

Anuj Kumar Dwivedi, Hitesh Upreti, C.S.P. Ojha
1Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee-247 667, Uttarakhand, India.
Cite article:- Dwivedi Kumar Anuj, Upreti Hitesh, Ojha C.S.P. (2022). Wheat Yield Modelling using Infocrop and DSSAT Crop Simulation Models. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 56(6): 646-652. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5981.

Background: Wheat is an important crop of India That is grown in the winter season (October to April). A field study was conducted for nine plots having a dimension of 3 × 2 meter and different nutrient was applied to test the biomass yield. The objectives are to describe (a): To conduct field experiments under controlled conditions and vary the dosage of fertilizers for different treatments. (b): To observe the variation in crop yield of wheat with different dosages of fertilizers. (c): To model the crop yield of different treatments using InfoCrop and DSSAT crop models.
Methods: An experiment was conducted for Wheat crop having a dimension of 3 × 2 meter at the Indian Institute of Technology, UK-India. Three plots (C1, C2, C3) was given control fertilizer supply while plot (F1, F2, F3) given -25%, +25%, +50% and plot (N1, N2, N3) given -25%, +25%, +50% w.r.t to control. The simulation model Infocrop and DSSAT were simulated to check test the model.
Result: In this study, two crop simulation models namely Infocrop and DSSAT were used to predict the yield of wheat crops. Field experiments were carried out at a farm site at Roorkee, India and different treatments of fertilizers are applied to the field plots. In total, seven fertilizer treatments are used: C (controlled with a normal dosage of fertilizers), F1, F2, F3 (varying amount of applied farmyard manure), N1, N2 and N3 (varying amount of applied urea). The objective of the study was to evaluate yields of the seven treatments using Infocrop and DSSAT crop models and compare them to the observed values of yields. The grain yield of the controlled treatment (C1, C2, C3) was predicted accurately by both models. There was a significant variation in the grain yields of the F1, F2, F3 treatments with the application of farm yard manure (FYM). DSSAT under-predicted the grain yields for the plot F1, F2, F3 treatments and over-predicted these for N1, N2, N3 treatments. Overall, Infocrop, which was developed and validated for Indian conditions, simulated the grain yield more accurately as compared to the DSSAT model under varying applications of FYM and urea dosages.

  1. Aggarwal, P.K. and Kalra, N. (1994). Analyzing the limitations set by climatic factors, genotype and water and nitrogen availability on the productivity of wheat II. Climatically potential yields and management strategies. Field Crops Research. 38(2): 93-103.

  2. Aggarwal, P.K., Bandyopadhyay, S.K., Pathak, H., Kalra, N., Chander, S. and Kumar, S. (2000). Analysis of yield trends of the rice-wheat system in north-western India. Outlook on Agriculture. 29(4): 259-268.

  3. Aggarwal, P.K., Kalra, N., Chander, S. and Pathak, H. (2006a). InfoCrop: A dynamic simulation model for the assessment of crop yields, losses due to pests and environmental impact of agro-ecosystems in tropical environments. I. Model description. Agricultural Systems. 89(1): 1-25.

  4. Aggarwal, P.K., Kalra, N., Chander, S. and Pathak, H. (2006b). InfoCrop: A dynamic simulation model for the assessment of crop yields, losses due to pests and environmental impact of agro-ecosystems in tropical environments. I. Model description. Agricultural Systems. 89(1): 1-25.

  5. Berge, H.F.M., Aggarwal, P.K., Kropû, M.J. (Eds.). (1997). Applications of Rice Modelling. Elsevier, Netherlands. 166.

  6. Carsel, R.F. and Parrish, R.S. (1988). Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics. Water Resources Research. 24(5): 755-769.

  7. Donaldson, E., Schillinger, W.F. and Dofing, S.M. (2001). Straw production and grain yield relationships in winter wheat. Crop Science. 41(1): 100-106.

  8. Engel, R.E., Long, D.S. and Carlson, G.R. (2003). Predicting straw yield of hard red spring wheat. Agronomy Journal. 95(6): 1454-1460.

  9. Fant, C.A., Gueneau, A., Strzepek, K., Awadalla, S., Farmer, W., Blanc, E. and Schlosser, C.A. (2012). CliCrop: Water stressless and irrigation demand model for an integrated global assessment model approach. MIT joint program on the science and policy of global change.

  10. Jamal, M., Nazir, M.S., Shah, S.H. and Ahmed, N. (1996). Varietal response of wheat to water stress at different growth stages. III. Effect on grain yield, straw yield, harvest, index and protein content in grain. Barley and Wheat Newsletter.

  11. Jones, J.W., Hoogenboom, G., Porter, C.H., Boote, K.J., Batchelor, W.D., Hunt, L.A. and Ritchie, J.T. (2003). The DSSAT cropping system model. European Journal of Agronomy. 18(3-4): 235-265.

  12. Jorgensen, L.N. and Olesen, J.E. (2002). Fungicide treatments affect yield and moisture content of grain and straw in winter wheat. Crop Protection. 21(10): 1023-1032.

  13. Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B. and Rubel, F. (2006). World map of the Koeppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Zeitschrift. 15: 259-263.

  14. Kropff, M.J., Teng, P.S., Aggarwal, P.K., Bouma, J., Bouman, B.A.M., Jones, J.W. and Van Laar, H.H. (Eds.). (2013). Applications of Systems Approaches at the Field Level: Volume 2: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Systems Approaches for Agricultural Development, held at IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines, 6-8 December 1995. (Vol. 6). Springer Science and Business Media.

  15. Matthews, R.B., Stephens, W. (2002). Crop-soil Simulation Models. Applications in Developing Countries. CABI Publishing. p. 277.

  16. Rivington, M. and Koo, J. (2011). Report on the Meta-Analysis of Crop Modelling for Climate Change and Food Security Survey. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Technical Report.

  17. Sinha, S.K., Singh, G.B. and Rai, M. (1998). The decline in crop productivity in Haryana and Punjab: Myth or reality. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India. 89.

  18. Thomsen, I.K., Djurhuus, J. and Christensen, B.T. (2003). Long continued applications of N fertilizer to cereals on sandy loam: Grain and straw response to residual N. Soil Use and Management. 19(1): 57-64.

  19. Van Laar, H.H., Goudriaan, J., van Keulen, H. (Eds). (1997). SUCROS97. Simulation of Crop Growth for Potential and Water-limited Production Situations. Quantitative Approaches in Systems Analysis 14. Wageningen, The Netherlands. CT de Wit Graduate School of Production ecology and AB-DLO. p. 52.

Editorial Board

View all (0)